Article published in:ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 165:1 (2014) ► pp. 46–75
Morphological variability at the morphosyntactic/semantic interface
Difficulty with epistemic modality in L2 Spanish. Morphological variability in L2
Recent literature in second language acquisition shows that syntax-driven structures give way to successful modal interpretation and morphological production, while discourse-dependent environments do not (Sorace, 2005; Tsimpli & Sorace, 2006, Borganovo, Bruhn de Garavito, & Prévost, 2008; Iverson, Kempchinsky, & Rothman, 2008). It has also been suggested that discourse-dependent environments involve both structural and pragmatic knowledge of L2, which intersect at the syntax-discourse interface (Sorace, 2005; Iverson, Kempchinsky, & Rothman, 2008), thereby requiring a multi-layered understanding of the target language. The present study contributes to this line of research by further examining morphological variability (Prévost & White, 2000; Sorace, 2000; Sorace, 2005; Iverson, Kempchinsky, & Rothman, 2008; Slabakova, 2009) in L2 acquisition at the morphosyntactic-semantic interface, following the work of Borganovo, Bruhn de Garavito, & Prévost (2008). The results of our study reveal that learners, even at advanced stages of acquisition, perform poorly in epistemic environments where syntax and discourse intersect. In such environments, there appears to be an interaction with pragmatics (cf. Iverson, Kempchinsky, & Rothman, 2008) that causes learners to opt for the indicative mood, even when the subjunctive is prescriptively required. Unlike deontic modality, which is essentially syntax-driven, epistemic modality requires structural knowledge, as well as knowledge from other domains (Sorace, 2005). Our study reveals that learners at all levels of instruction performed better in “purely syntactic” environments of deontic modality than in pragmatically challenging epistemic environments.
Keywords: modality, epistemic, deontic, syntax, semantics, morphology
Published online: 06 June 2014
Borganovo, C., Bruhn de Garvito, J., & Prévost, P.. (
2008) Methodological issues in the L2 acquisition of a syntax/semantics phenomenon: How to assess L2 knowledge of mood in Spanish relative clauses. In J. Bruhn de Garavito, & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 13–24). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Borganovo, C., & Prévost, P.. (
Chen, H.. (
Collentine, J.. (
Foster, D.. (
Goldin, M.. (
Gudmestad, A.. (
2006) L2 variation and the Spanish subjunctive: Linguistic features predicting mood selection. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 170–184). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Haznadar, B.. (
Hualde, J.I., Olarrea, A., Escobar, A.M., Travis, C.. (
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J.. (
Kellerman, E.. (
Lardiere, D.. (
Lazano, A.. (
Lightbown, P.. (
Lubbers Quesada, M.. (
Massery, L., & Fuentes, C.. (
Mejias-Vikindi E.. (
Pérez-Leroux, A.. (
Prévost, P., & White, L.. (
Ramsey F.L., & Schafer D.W. (
Schane, S.. (
1994) Illocutionary verbs, subject responsibility, and presupposition: The indicative versus the subjunctive in Spanish. In P. Hashemipour, R. Maldonado, & M. Van Naerssen (Eds.), Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 361–374). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R.. (
Slabakova, R.. (
Sorace, A.. (
Terrell, T. & Hooper, J.. (
Terrell, T., Baycroft, B., & Perrone, C.. (
Tsimpli, I.M., & Sorace, A.. (
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.. (
Cited by 1 other publications
Antonova-Unlu, Elena & Li Wei
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.