Article published in:
Recent Advances in Automatic Readability Assessment and Text Simplification
Edited by Thomas François and Delphine Bernhard
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 165:2] 2014
► pp. 223258


Bamberg, B.
(1983) What makes a text coherent? College Composition and Communication, 34(4), 417–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., & Lenci, A.
(2010) Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based Semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4), 673–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barzilay, R., & Elhadad, M.
(1997) Using lexical chains for text summarization. Proceedings of ACL Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop (pp. 10–17). http://​acl​.ldc​.upenn​.edu​/W​/W97​/W97​-0703​.pdf
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M.
(2008) Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics, 34(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beigman Klebanov, B., & Flor, M.
(2013a) Word association profiles and their use for automated scoring of essays. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , (pp. 1148–1158). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/P​/P13​/P13​-1113​.pdf
(2013b) Associative texture is lost in translation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse in Machine Translation (DiscoMT at ACL2013) (pp. 27–32). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/W​/W13​/W13​-3304​.pdf
Beigman Klebanov, B., & Shamir, E.
(2006) Reader-based exploration of lexical cohesion. Language Resources and Evaluation, 40(2), 109–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, G.
(2009) Normalized (Pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In Chiarcos, Eckart de Castilho & Stede (Eds.), Von der Form zur Bedeutung: Texte automatisch verarbeiten / From Form to Meaning: Processing Texts Automatically (pp. 31–40). Proceedings of the Biennial GSCL Conference 2009. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. Google Scholar
Budanitsky, A., & Hirst, G.
(2006) Evaluating wordnet-based measures of semantic distance. Computational Linguistics, 32(1), 13–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bullinaria, J., & Levy, J.
(2007) Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 510–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chall, J.S.
(1996) Varying approaches to readability measurement. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 25(1), 23–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chall, J.S., & Dale, E.
(1995) Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Church, K., & Hanks, P.
(1990) Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
Coleman, M., & Liau, T.L.
(1975) A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI)
(2010) Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO and National Governors Association. http://​www​.corestandards​.org​/ELA​-LiteracyGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S.A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D.S.
(2008) Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 475–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N.
(2001) Bat loves the night. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick.Google Scholar
DuBay, W.H.
(2004) The principles of readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information. http://​www​.impact​-information​.com​/impactinfo​/readability02​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Evert, S.
(2008) Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, article 58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feng, L., Jansche, M., Huenerfauth, M., & Elhadad, N.
(2010) A comparison of features for automatic readability assessment. Proceedings of COLING 2010 , (Poster Volume, pp. 276–284). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/C​/C10​/C10​-2032​.pdf
Flesch, R.
(1948) A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flor, M.
(2013) A fast and flexible architecture for very large word n-gram datasets. Natural Language Engineering, 19(1), 61–93. DOI: Crossref DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flor, M., Beigman Klebanov, B., & Sheehan, K.M.
(2013) Lexical tightness and text complexity. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop Natural Language Processing for Improving Textual Accessibility (NLP4ITA) (pp. 29–38). NAACL HLT 2013 Conference, Atlanta, USA. http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology​-new​/W​/W13​/W13​-1504​.pdf
Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T.K.
(1998) The measurement of textual coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G.S.
(2001) Guiding readers and writers, grades 3–6. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Freebody, P., & Anderson, R.C.
(1981) Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Technical Report No. 225, Center for the Study of Reading. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., & Kulikowich, J.M.
(2011) Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graff, D., & Cieri, C.
(2003) English Gigaword. LDC2003T05. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Green, S.
(1998) Automated link generation: Can we do better than term repetition? Computer Networks, 30, 75–84.Google Scholar
Grosz, B., Joshi, A., & Weinstein, S.
(1995) Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203–226.Google Scholar
Guinaudeau, C., Gravier, G., & Sébillot, P.
(2012) Enhancing lexical cohesion measure with confidence measures, semantic relations and language model interpolation for multimedia spoken content topic segmentation. Computer Speech and Language, 26, 90–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gunning, R.
(1952) The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gurevych, I., & Strube, M.
(2004) Semantic similarity applied to spoken dialogue summarization. Proceedings of COLING 2004 (pp. 764–770). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/C​/C04​/C04​-1110​.pdf
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R.
(1976), Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
(2004) An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
(2013) http://​havefunteaching​.com, Last accessed May 9, 2013.
Hiebert, E.H.
(2013) Text Project. http://​textproject​.org. Last accessed May 9, 2013.
(2012) Readability and the common core’s staircase of text complexity. Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject Inc.Google Scholar
(2011) Using multiple sources of information in establishing text complexity. Reading Research Report 11.03. Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject Inc.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
(1991) Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P. Jr., Rogers, R.L., & Chissom, B.S.
(1975) Derivation of new readability formulas for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75. Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T.
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.D., Pincombe, B.M., & Welsh, M.B.
(2005) An empirical evaluation of models of text document similarity. In B.G. Bara, L.W. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1254–1259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lenci, A.
(2011) Composing and updating verb argument expectations: A distributional semantic model. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) (pp. 58–66). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/W​/W11​/W11​-0607​.pdf
Manning, C., & Schütze, H.
(1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marathe, M., & Hirst, G.
(2010) Lexical chains using distributional measures of concept distance. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (Vol. 6008, pp. 291–302). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, G.H.
(1969) SMOG grading A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646.Google Scholar
McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., McCarthy, P.M., & Graesser, A.C.
(2010) Coh-metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D.S., Cai, Z., & Louwerse, M.M.
(2007) Optimizing LSA measures of cohesion. In T.K. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 379–400). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
McNemar, Q.
(1955) Psychological statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J., & Lapata, M.
(2008) Vector-based models of semantic composition. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 236–244). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/P​/P08​/P08​-1028​.pdf
Mohammad, S., & Hirst, G.
(2006) Distributional measures of concept-distance: A task-oriented evaluation. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2006) (pp. 35–43). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/W​/W06​/W06​-1605​.pdf
Morris, J., & Hirst, G.
(2005) The subjectivity of lexical cohesion in text. In J. Shanahan, Y. Qu & J. Wiebe (Eds.), Computing attitude and affect in text (pp. 41–48). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
(2004) Non-Classical Lexical Semantic Relations. Proceedings of the Computational Lexical Semantics Workshop at HLT-NAACL 2004 conference . http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/W​/W04​/W04​-2607​.pdf doi: Crossref
(1991) Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics, 17(1), 21–48.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., Perfetti, C., Liben, D., & Liben, M.
(2012) Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade levels and student performance. Student Achievement Partners. http://​www​.ccsso​.org​/Documents​/2012​/Measures%20ofText%20Difficulty​_final​.2012​.pdf
Pecina, P.
(2010) Lexical association measures and collocation extraction. Language Resources & Evaluation, 44, 137–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, S.E., & Ostendorf, M.
(2009) A machine learning approach to reading level assessment. Computer Speech and Language, 23, 89–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A.
(2008) Revisiting readability: A unified framework for predicting text quality. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 186–195). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/D​/D08​/D08​-1020​.pdf
Renkema, J.
(2004) Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulte im Walde, S., & Melinger, A.
(2008) An in-depth look into the co-occurrence distribution of semantic associates. Rivista di Linguistica, 20(1), 89–128.Google Scholar
Senter, R.J., & Smith, E.A.
(1967) Automated readability index. Report AMRL-TR-6620. USA: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T., Fisher, D., & Frey, N.
(2012) The challenge of challenging text. Educational Leadership, 69(6), 58–62.Google Scholar
Sheehan, K.M.
(2013) Measuring cohesion: An approach that accounts for differences in the degree of integration challenge presented by different types of sentences. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(4), 28–37. DOI: Crossref DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, K.M., Flor, M., & Napolitano, D.
(2013) A two-stage approach for generating unbiased estimates of text complexity. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop Natural Language Processing for Improving Textual Accessibility (NLP4ITA) (pp. 49–58), NAACL HLT 2013 conference. http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/W​/W13​/W13​-1506​.pdf
Sheehan, K.M, Futagi, Y., Kostin, I., & Flor, M.
(2010) Generating automated text complexity classifications that are aligned with targeted text complexity standards. ETS Research Report RR-10-28, Princeton, NJ: ETS. http://​www​.ets​.org​/research​/policy​_research​_reports​/rr​-10​-28Google Scholar
Sheehan, K.M., Kostin, I., & Futagi, Y.
(2008) When do standard approaches for measuring vocabulary difficulty, syntactic complexity and referential cohesion yield biased estimates of text difficulty? In B.C. Love, K. McRae & V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(2007) SourceFinder: A construct-driven approach for locating appropriately targeted reading comprehension source texts. Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop of the International Speech Communication Association . Farmington, PA: Special Interest Group on Speech and Language Technology in Education.
Silber, H.G., & McCoy, K.
(2002) Efficiently computed lexical chains as an intermediate representation for automatic text summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), 487–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Štajner, S., Evans, R., Orăsan, C., & Mitkov, R.
(2012) What can readability measures really tell us about text complexity? Proceedings of Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Improving Textual Accessibility (NLP4ITA) at LREC 2012 conference (pp. 14–22). http://​www​.taln​.upf​.edu​/nlp4ita​/pdfs​/stajner​-nlp4ita2012​.pdf
Stokes, N., Carthy, J., & Smeaton, A.F.
(2004) SeLeCT: A lexical cohesion based news story segmentation system. AI Communications, 17(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.D.
(1976) Roll of thunder, hear my cry. New York, NY: Phyllis Fogelman Books.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, S.-K.
(2006) Collaborating towards coherence: Lexical cohesion in English discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, R.J., & Mosenthal, J.H.
(1983) Cohesion and textual coherence. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215–229.Google Scholar
Turney, P.D., & Pantel, P.
(2010) From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37, 141–188.Google Scholar
Turney, P.D.
(2001) Mining the web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 491–502). Freiburg, Germany.
Vajjala, S., & Meurers, D.
(2012) On improving the accuracy of readability classification using insights from second language acquisition. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on the Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA-7) (pp. 163–173). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/W​/W12​/W12​-2019​.pdf
Woodsend, K., & Lapata, M.
(2011) Learning to simplify sentences with quasi-synchronous grammar and integer programming. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 409–420). http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/D​/D11​/D11​-1038​.pdf
Yang, D., & Powers, D.M.W.
(2006) Word sense disambiguation using lexical cohesion in the context. Proceedings of COLING/ACL2006, Main Conference Poster Sessions (pp. 929–936).http://​aclweb​.org​/anthology/​/P​/P06​/P06​-2119​.pdf
Zhang, Z., Gentile, A.L., & Ciravegna, F.
(2012) Recent advances in methods of lexical semantic relatedness a survey. Natural Language Engineering, 19(4), 411–479. Crossref DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hartmann, Nathan, Livia Cucatto, Danielle Brants & Sandra Aluísio
2016.  In Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9727],  pp. 12 ff. Crossref logo
Saggion, Horacio
2017. Automatic Text Simplification. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 10:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.