Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 167:2 (2016) ► pp.210–234
Vol. 167:2 (2016) ► pp.210–234
Exemplar-based instructed second language development and classroom experience
References
Bygate, M
(2015) Introduction. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. xv–xxiv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Dąbrowska, E., & Lieven, E
(2005) Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 161, 437–474. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI:
Ellis, N.C
(2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 271, 1–24.
Ellis, N.C., & Ferreira-Junior, F
(2009) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 187–220.
Ellis, R
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Eskildsen, S.W
(2009) Constructing another language — Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 301, 335–357.
(2011) The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 327–364). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
(2014) What’s new?: A usage-based classroom study of linguistic routines and creativity in L2 learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 521, 1–30.
(2015) What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 651, 33–62.
Hunt, K.W
(1965) Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (Research Report No. 3). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. I). Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L
(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M
(2003) Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child language, 301, 333–370.
Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M
(2009) Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 201, 481–507.
Macqueen, S
(2012) The emergence of patterns in second language writing: A sociocognitive exploration of lexical trails. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Mellow, J.D
(2006) The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 271, 645–670.
Polio, C
(2012) How to research second language writing. In A. Mackey & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 139–157). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N.C
(2008) Conclusion: Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction—issues for research. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489–545). New York, NY: Routledge.
Roehr-Brackin, K
(2014) Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning, 641, 771–808.
(2015) Long-term development in an instructed adult L2 learner: Usage-based and complexity theory applied. In T. Cadierno & S.W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 181–206). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter Mouton.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shibata, M
(2006) Topic marking in English composition by Japanese EFL learners. Scripsimus, 151, 1–26. Retrieved from [URL]
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 931, 5–29.
Tode, T
(2016, April). Effects of construal awareness on the learning of typologically different second language grammar. Paper presented at the
Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics
, Orlando, FL.
Tomasello, M
(2000) First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 111, 61–82.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, C
(2016) Context and language transfer. In L. Yu & T. Odlin (Eds.), New perspectives on transfer in second language learning (pp. 226–236). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Willis, D., & Willis, J
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Yuldashev, A., Fernandez, J., & Thorne, S.L
(2013) Second language learners’ contiguous and discontiguous multi-word unit use over time. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 31–45.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Eskildsen, S. W.
2021. Embodiment, Semantics and Social Action: The Case of Object-Transfer in L2 Classroom Interaction. Frontiers in Communication 6 
Eskildsen, Søren Wind
2020. From Constructions to Social Action. In Ontologies of English, ► pp. 59 ff.
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Römer, Ute & Cynthia M. Berger
2019. OBSERVING THE EMERGENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5 ► pp. 1089 ff.
THEODÓRSDÓTTIR, GUÐRÚN & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Accumulating Semiotic Resources for Social Actions: A Case Study of L2 Icelandic in the Wild. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 46 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.