This study investigated L2 structural alignment, the tendency for interlocutors to re-use a syntactic structure present in recent discourse, focusing on two information-gap interactive tasks. Thirty-four university students from diverse language backgrounds, recruited from different academic programs at a Canadian English-medium university, carried out the two information-gap interactive tasks in dyads. Interaction data were transcribed and coded for instances of structural alignment and the alignment’s characteristics in terms of structure type and accuracy. Results indicated that structural alignment occurred in L2 task-based interaction generated by both tasks. This structural repetition was linked to an improved accuracy of subsequent language production. Furthermore, the two tasks were associated with different structures that were converged on, and with varying degrees of structural alignment. These findings are discussed in terms of effects of task features on structural alignment, and the role of structural alignment in subsequent language production.
Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H. S., & Weinert, R.
(1991) The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 341, 351–366.
Bock, J. K.
(1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 181, 355–387.
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M.
(2000) The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1291, 177–192.
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., & Cleland, A.
(2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition, 751, 13–25.
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., Person, J., & McLean, J.
(2010) Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 2355–2368.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M.
(2000) Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 291, 217–229.
(1992) Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Colina, A. A. & Garcia-Mayo, M. P.
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Ed.), Handbook of research on language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2007) Interaction as practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language learning. Perspective from linguistics and psychology (pp. 85–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2012) Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.
(2006) Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 281, 169–178.
(2014) Using structural priming tasks in an EAP context. Contact, 401, 51–67.
(2006) Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 281, 179–207.
(2010) Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 661, 817–841.
McDonough, K., & Kim, Y.
(2009) Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. The Modern Language Journal, 931, 386–398.
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A.
(2008) Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 31–47.
McDonough, K., Neumann, H., & Trofimovich, P.
(2015) Eliciting production of L2 target structures through priming activities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(1), 75–95.
Michel, M., & Smith, B.
(2017) Measuring lexical alignment during L2 chat interaction: An eye-tracking study. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (eds.), Salience in second language acquisition, (pp. 246–266). New Yorkk, NY: Routledge.
(2001) Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2002) The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 861, 97–111.
(2017) Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 211, 75–766.
(1994) Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?Language Learning, 441, 493–527.
(2013) Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Toward a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly, 471, 600–614.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P.
(1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651.
Pickering, M. & Ferreira
(2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 271, 169–225.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 361, 329–392.
Reitter, D., & Moore, J. D.
(2014) Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 761, 29–46.
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2003) Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 61, 557–567.
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2006) Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 21, 27–49.
Shin, J., & Christianson, K.
(2012) Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, 63(3), 931–964.
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L.
(2001) Syntactic pirming in spoken sentence production: An online study. Cognition, 78(2), 123–164.
(2001) How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 51, 29–53.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Ed.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trofimovich, P., McDonough, K., & Neumann, H.
(2013) Using collaborative tasks to elicit auditory and structural priming. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 177–186.
Trofimovich, P., & Kennedy, S.
(2014) Interactive alignment between bilingual interlocutors: Evidence from two information-exchange tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(4), 822–836.
Van Engen, K., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R., Kim, M. & Bradlow, A.
(2010) The Wildcat corpus of native and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language & Speech, 531, 510–540.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M.
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 111, 121–142.
Yule, G. & Macdonald, D.
(1990) Resolving referential conflict in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning 401, 539–556.
Cited by 11 other publications
Kim, YouJin & Marije Michel
2023. Linguistic alignment in second language acquisition: A methodological review. System 115 ► pp. 103007 ff.
Michel, Marije, Christine Appel & Saioa Cipitria
2022. Lexical and syntactic alignment during English-Spanish teletandem meetings. System 111 ► pp. 102930 ff.
Michel, Marije & Marco Cappellini
2019. Alignment During Synchronous Video Versus Written Chat L2 Interactions: A Methodological Exploration. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39 ► pp. 189 ff.
Michel, Marije & Breffni O'Rourke
2019. What drives alignment during text chat with a peer vs. a tutor? Insights from cued interviews and eye-tracking. System 83 ► pp. 50 ff.
2023. Interactive Alignment in L2 Learning: The Link between Social Interaction and Psycholinguistic Phenomena. Education Sciences 13:8 ► pp. 792 ff.
Tekin, Oguzhan, Pavel Trofimovich, Tzu-Hua Chen & Kim McDonough
2022. Alignment in second language speakers’ perceptions of interaction and its relationship to perceived communicative success. System 108 ► pp. 102848 ff.
Wang, Chuming & Wei Hong
2021. An Alignment-Based Approach to L2 Learning of Chinese Numeral Classifiers. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Wang, Min, Qiao Gan & Julie Boland
2021. L2 Syntactic Alignment in the Reading-Writing Integrated Continuation Task: Evidence From Chinese EFL Learners’ Description of Motion Events. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 292 ff.
Wang, Min, Qiao Gan & Julie E. Boland
2022. Effect of interactive intensity on lexical alignment and L2 writing quality. System 108 ► pp. 102847 ff.
2022. Effect of Interaction and Alignment of Continuation Task in Chinese as a Second Language Writing. Journal of Language, Identity & Education► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.