Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 169:2 (2018) ► pp. 293320
References

References

Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H. S., & Weinert, R.
(1991) The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34, 351–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K.
(1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M.
(2000) The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., & Cleland, A.
(2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, 13–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., Person, J., & McLean, J.
(2010) Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2355–2368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M.
(2000) Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.
(1992) Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Colina, A. A. & Garcia-Mayo, M. P.
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Collentine, J., & Collentine, K.
(2013) A corpus approach to studying structural convergence in task-based Spanish L2 interactions. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 167–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Pickering, M. J. & Sorace, A.
(2008) Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Process, 23(4), 528–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dao, P., & McDonough, K.
(2017) The effect of task role on Vietnamese EFL learners’ collaboration in mixed proficiency dyads. System, 65, 15–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dao, P., Iwashita, N., & Gatbonton, E.
(2017) Learner attention to form in ACCESS task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 454–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (3), 299–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J.
(2009) Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 292–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(1997) Input, interaction, and second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Construction at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S.
(2005) Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 34, 365–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., & Huang, K.
(2015) The efficacy of structural priming on the acquisition of double object construction by Chinese EFL learners. Higher Education Studies, 5, 38–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M., Horton, W., & Bradlow, A.
(2010) Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversation as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2, 125–156.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.
(2013) Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In: K. McDonough, & A. Mackey (Eds.). Second language interaction in diverse educational context (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, (2), 211–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., Philp, J. & Nakamura, S.
(2017) Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21, 665–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levkina, M., & Gilabert, R.
(2012) The effects of cognitive task complexity on L2 oral production. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, (pp. 171–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Ed.), Handbook of research on language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A.
(2007) Interaction as practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language learning. Perspective from linguistics and psychology (pp. 85–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.
(2006) Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 169–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough
(2014) Using structural priming tasks in an EAP context. Contact, 40, 51–67.Google Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2006) Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Eliciting wh-questions through collaborative syntactic priming activities during peer interaction. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching, and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 131–151). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W.
(2010) Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 817–841. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Kim, Y.
(2009) Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 386–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A.
(2008) Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 31–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., Neumann, H., & Trofimovich, P.
(2015) Eliciting production of L2 target structures through priming activities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(1), 75–95.Google Scholar
Michel, M., & Smith, B.
(2017) Measuring lexical alignment during L2 chat interaction: An eye-tracking study. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (eds.), Salience in second language acquisition, (pp. 246–266). New Yorkk, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nuevo, A., Adams, R. & Ross-Feldman, R.
(2011) Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction. In R. Robinsons (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, (pp. 175–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. S.
(2001) Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R.
(2002) The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 86, 97–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phung, L.
(2017) Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 21, 75–766. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
(1994) Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piccardo, E.
(2013) Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Toward a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 600–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P.
(1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. & Ferreira
(2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reitter, D., & Moore, J. D.
(2014) Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 29–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2003) Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6, 557–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 2, 27–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J., & Christianson, K.
(2012) Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, 63(3), 931–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L.
(2001) Syntactic pirming in spoken sentence production: An online study. Cognition, 78(2), 123–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2001) How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Ed.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., McDonough, K., & Neumann, H.
(2013) Using collaborative tasks to elicit auditory and structural priming. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 177–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Kennedy, S.
(2014) Interactive alignment between bilingual interlocutors: Evidence from two information-exchange tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(4), 822–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, K., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R., Kim, M. & Bradlow, A.
(2010) The Wildcat corpus of native and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language & Speech, 53, 510–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M.
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G. & Macdonald, D.
(1990) Resolving referential conflict in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning 40, 539–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Michel, Marije & Marco Cappellini
2019. Alignment During Synchronous Video Versus Written Chat L2 Interactions: A Methodological Exploration. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39  pp. 189 ff. Crossref logo
Michel, Marije & Breffni O'Rourke
2019. What drives alignment during text chat with a peer vs. a tutor? Insights from cued interviews and eye-tracking. System 83  pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.