Article published in:
Technology-mediated feedback and instruction
Edited by Hossein Nassaji and Eva Kartchava
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:2] 2019
► pp. 277308


(Note: Studies included in the meta-analysis are marked by an asterisk *)

*Alcón-Soler, E.
(2015) Instruction and pragmatic change during study abroad email communication. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 34–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) “Teachability and Bilingualism Effects on Third Language Learners’ Pragmatic Knowledge.” Intercultural Pragmatics 9: 511–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Alcón-Soler, E. & Guzman-Pitarch, J.
(2010) The Effect of Instruction on Learners’ Pragmatic Awareness: A Focus on Refusals. International Journal of English Studies, 10 (1), 65–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. A., & Martinez-Flor, A.
(2008) Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Badjadi, N. I.
(2016) A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Instructional Tasks on L2 Pragmatics Comprehension and Production. In Tang, S. F. and Logonnathan, L. (Eds.), Assessment for Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom (pp. 241–268). Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(1999) Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677–713. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Recognition and production of formulas in L2 pragmatics. In Z.-H. Han, (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 205–222). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2009) Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 59, 755–795. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63 (Suppl. 1), 68–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mahan-Taylor, R.
(2003) Teaching pragmatics. Washington DC: Office of English Programs, U.S. Department of State.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Hartford, B. A. S., Mahan-Taylor, R., Morgan, M. J., & Reynolds, D. W.
(1991) Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal, 45, 4–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Bardovi-Harling, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E.
(2015) The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research. 19, 324–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Barekat, B., & Mehri, M.
(2013) Investigating the effect of metalinguistic feedback in L2 pragmatic instruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 5, 197–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N.
(2008) The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 33–52.Google Scholar
(2005) Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles, Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 17–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Chen, Y. S.
(2011) The effect of explicit teaching of American compliment exchanges to Chinese learners of English. English Teaching & Learning, 35, 1–42.Google Scholar
Chow, S. & Liu, J.P.
(1999) Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Boca Raton. CRC Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N.
(2018) Second Language Pragmatics : From Theory to Research. NY. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Cunningham, J.
(2016) Request Modification in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Focused Instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 484–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, D. J., & Vyatkina, N.
(2012) Telecollaboration for professional purposes: Towards developing a formal register in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 422–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Dastjerdi, H. V., & Farshid, M.
(2011) The role of input enhancement in teaching compliments. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(2), 460–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z.
(2015) The Effect of Consciousness-raising Instruction on the pragmatic Development of Apology and Request. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. 18(4).1–24.Google Scholar
*Eslami, Z. R., & Liu, C. N.
(2013) Learning pragmatics through computer-mediated communication in Taiwan. Iranian Journal of Society, Culture, and Language, 52–73.Google Scholar
*Eslami, Z. R., & Eslami-Rasekh, A.
(2008) Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In E. Alcón-Soler & Martinez-Flor, A. (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 178–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Farahian, M., Rezaee, M., & Gholami, A.
(2012) Does direct instruction develop pragmatic competence? Teaching refusals to EFL learners of English. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3, 814–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Felix-Brasdefer, J. C.
(2008) Pedagogical intervention and the development of pragmatic competence in learning Spanish as a foreign language. Issues in Applied Linguistics 16, 49–84.Google Scholar
*Fordyce, K.
(2014) The differential effects of explicit and Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Use of Epistemic Stance. Applied Linguistics, 35, 6–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Fukuya, Y., & Martinez-Flor, A.
(2008) The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatics instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 41, 478–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Furniss, E.
(2016) Teaching the pragmatics of Russian conversation using a corpus referred website. Language Learning and Technology, 20, 38–60.Google Scholar
*Ghobadi, A., & Fahim, M.
(2009) The effect of explicit teaching of English ‘Thanking formulas on Iranian EFL intermediate level students at English language institutes. System, 37, 526–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Gu, X. L.
(2011) The effect of explicit and implicit instructions of request strategies. Intercultural Communication Studies, 20(1), 104–123.Google Scholar
Hedges, L.
(1992) Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis. Statistical Science, 7, 246–255. Retrieved from http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/2246311
Hedges, L., & Vevea, J.
(1998) Fixed- and Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Hernandez, T. A.
(2011) Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15, 159–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L.
(2000) Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, M. & Cohen, A. D.
(2010) Teaching and Learning Pragmatics, Where Language and Culture Meet. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T.
(2006) Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In N. John & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Jernigan, J.
(2012) Output and English as a second language pragmatic development: The effectiveness of output-focused video-based instruction. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 2–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.
(1999) Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kakegawa, T.
(2009) Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. In N. Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 301–333.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Khaerudin, T.
(2012) Envisioning the use of technology to teach pragmatics. IJ-TEFL, 1, 60–69.Google Scholar
*Li, Q.
(2012) Effects of instruction on adolescent beginners’ acquisition of request modification. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 30–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Li, S.
(2012) The effect of input-based practice on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese. Language Learning, 62, 403–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Amount of practice and pragmatic development of request-making in L2 Chinese. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 43–70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. M.
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning (pp. 379–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez-Flor, A., & Alcón-Soler, E.
(2005) Special issue: Pragmatics in instructed language learning. System, 33, 381–456. Retrieved from https://​www​.sciencedirect​.com​/journal​/system​/vol​/33​/issue​/3
*Martínez-Flor, A., & Alcón-Soler, E.
(2007) Developing pragmatic awareness of suggestions in the EFL classroom: A focus on instructional effects. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 47–76.Google Scholar
*Narita, R.
(2012) The effects of pragmatic consciousness-raising activity on the development of pragmatic awareness and use of hearsay evidential markers for learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M.
(2008) Modifying L2 criticism: how learners do it? Journal of Pragmatics 40, 768–791. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Nguyen, T. T. M.
(2013) Instructional effects on the acquisition of modifiers in constructive criticisms by EFL learners. Language Awareness, 22, 76–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., Nguyen, A. T., & Pham, M. H.
(2015) Teaching email requests in the academic context: a focus on the role of corrective feedback, Language Awareness, 24(2), 169–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Nguyena, T. T. M., Phamb, T. H., & Phamb, M. T.
(2012) The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 416–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L.
(2010) Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Rafieyan, V.
(2016) Effect of ‘Focus on Form’ versus ‘Focus on Forms’ Pragmatic Instruction on Development of Pragmatic Comprehension and Production. Journal of Education and Practice, 7, 41–48.Google Scholar
*Rafieyan, V., Sharafi-Nejad, M., Khavari, Z., Siew Eng, L., & Mohamed, A. R.
(2014) Pragmatic Comprehension Development through Telecollaboration. English Language Teaching, 7, 11–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R.
(2005) On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K., & Kasper, G.
(2001) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R.
(1995) Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M.
(Eds.) (2006) Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Saita, I.
(2001) Aizuchi and cut in-focusing on a situation and setting where a problem concerning cross-cultural communication often occurs. A study on two-way distance learning system of Japanese language (Research outcome report. Grant-in-aid scientific research report 1999–2000). (C) (2), 9–21.Google Scholar
*Simin, S., Eslami, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Ketabi, S.
(2014) The effects of explicit teaching of apologies on Persian EFL learners’ performance: When e-communication helps. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3, 71–84.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
(2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J.
(2005) Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO, 22, 399–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2006) Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16, 513–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J. M.
(2013) Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2005a) Comprehension of implied meaning in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 89, 543–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Tajeddin, Z., Keshavarz, M. H., & Zand Moghaddam, A.
(2012) The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching on EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Production, Metapragmatic Awareness, and Pragmatic Self-Assessment. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 15, 139–166.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S.
(1996) Pragmatic transferability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 189–223.Google Scholar
(2010a) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (vol.7, pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010b) The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In Mart´ınez- Flor, A. & E. Us´o-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 127–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M.
(2006) The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10, 393–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Takimoto, M.
(2007) The effects of referential oriented activity in the structured input task on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 13, 46–60.Google Scholar
Takimoto, M.
(2008) The Effects of Deductive and Inductive Instruction on the Development of Language Learners' Pragmatic Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 369–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Takimoto, M.
(2012a) Assessing the effects of identical task repetition and task type repetition on learners’ recognition and production of second language request downgraders. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9, 71–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Tan, K. H., & Farashaiyan, A.
(2012) The effectiveness of teaching formulaic politeness strategies in making request to undergraduates in an ESL classroom. Asian Social Science 8, 189–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Tanaka, H., & Oki, N.
(2015) An attempt to raise Japanese EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness using online discourse completion tasks. The jalt call Journal. 11(2).143–154.Google Scholar
*Tateyama, Y.
(2007) The effects of instruction on pragmatic awareness. In K. Bradford-Watts (ed.), JALT 2006 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT, 1189–1200. Available online at http://​jalt​-publications​.org​/archive​/proceedings​/2006​/E128​.pdf
(2009) Requesting in Japanese: The effect of instruction on JFL learners’ pragmatic competence. In N. Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 129–166.Google Scholar
Utashiro, T., & Kawai, G.
(2009) Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peer-based instruction. In N. Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 275–299. http://​journals​.cambridge​.org Downloaded: 11 Mar 2015 IP address: Scholar
Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W.
(2010) Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 1(2): 112–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, N., & Belz, J. A.
(2006) A learner corpus-driven intervention for the development of L2 pragmatic competence. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J. C. Fe´lix- Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (pp. 315–357). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Wishnoff, J.
(2000) Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 19, 127–157.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Boers, Frank, Lara Bryfonski, Farahnaz Faez & Todd McKay
2021. A CALL FOR CAUTIOUS INTERPRETATION OF META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Ying
2021. Combining computer-mediated communication with data-driven instruction: EFL learners’ pragmatic development of compliment responses. System 103  pp. 102624 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.