Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 173:1 (2022) ► pp.58–93

The effect of input modes and number of exposures on the learning of L2 binomials

ORCID logo | University of Jeddah | University of Nottingham
| University College London
| University of Nottingham
Despite the importance of mastering different types of formulaic sequences in a second language, little is known about the relative effect of different input modes on their acquisition. This study explores the learning of a particular type of formulaic language (binomials) in three input modes (reading-only, listening-only, and reading-while-listening) at different frequencies of exposure (2, 4, 5 and 6 occurrences). Arabic learners of English were presented with three stories, each in a different mode, that contained novel binomials (e.g., wires and pipes) and existing binomials (e.g., brother and sister). Two post-tests (multiple-choice and familiarity ratings) assessed learners’ knowledge of the binomials. Results showed that reading-only and reading-while-listening led to better performance on the tasks than listening-only. Frequency of exposure had an effect on the perceived familiarity of binomials.
Keywords: incidental learning, formulaic language, reading, reading-while-listening, listening
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • Incidental learning of individual words and formulaic sequences
    • The effect of number of exposures on incidental vocabulary learning
  • Methodology
    • Participants
    • Binomials and passages
    • Post-tests
    • Procedure
    • Analysis
  • Results
    • Multiple-choice test
    • Familiarity ratings
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.21001.alo
References (58)
References
Aljabri, S. S. (2013). EFL students’ judgments of English idiom familiarity and transparency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 662–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benor, S. B., & Levy, R. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language, 82(2), 233–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136–163.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, J., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carrol, G. & Conklin, K. (2014). Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(4), 784–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Cross language priming extends to formulaic units: evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea “has legs”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 299–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., Conklin, K. & Gyllstad, H. (2016). Found in translation: The influence of L1 on the reading of idioms in a L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 403–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, A. C-S. (2009). Gains to L2 listeners from reading while listening vs. listening only in comprehending short stories. System, 37(4), 652–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2020). What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research, 36(3), 257–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., & Carrol, G. (2020). Words go together like ‘bread and butter’: The rapid, automatic learning of lexical patterns in natural reading contexts. Applied Linguistics. Online First, 1–23.Google Scholar
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and non-native speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20(1), 29–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farghal, M., & Jaber, A. (1995). Vocabulary. Amman: Al-Quds Open University.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., & Webb, S. (2020). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing. Which mode of input is most effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 499–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A Review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 258–86). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isobe, Y. (2011). Representation and processing of formulaic sequences in L2 mental lexicon: How do Japanese EFL learners process multi-word expressions? JACET Kansai Journal, 131, 38–49.Google Scholar
Jelani, N. A. M., & Boers, F. (2018). Examining incidental vocabulary acquisition from captioned video. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 169–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, P. (2018). Formulaic language and speech prosody. In A. Pellicer-Sánchez & A. Siyanova-Chanturia (Eds), Understanding Formulaic Language (pp. 78-94). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1959). Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 81, 113–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, M. L. (1983). Development of reading-while-listening skills in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(1), 38–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malone, J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 651–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E., & Levy, R. (2016). Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions. Cognition, 1571, 382–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(2), 384–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owusu-Darko, I., Kwasi Adu, I., & Frempong, N. K. (2014). Application of generalized estimating equation (GEE) model on students’ academic performance. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 68(8), 3359–3374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 31–55.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 113–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 551-577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019). Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: An exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, 471, 424–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Learning formulaic sequences through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language acquisition, 42(3), 525–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning through watching television. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171(2),191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 776–791.Google Scholar
Syodorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 50–73.Google Scholar
Szudarski, P. (2012). Effects of meaning- and form- focused instruction on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 3–37.Google Scholar
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2014). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 245–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus. (2007). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: [URL]
Uchihara, T., Webb, S., & Yanagisawa, A. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning, 69(3), 559-599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(1), 168–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41(3), 609–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal, K. (2003). Academic listening: a source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 56–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vilkaitė, L. (2017). Incidental acquisition of collocations: Effects of adjacency and prior vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(2), 248–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (2020). Learning vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement: Insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC Journal. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), 130–163.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 55–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63(1), 91–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C-S. (2020). How does mode of input affect the incidental learning of collocations? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 541–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeger, S., & Liang, K. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42(1), 121–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Altamimi, Abdulaziz & Kathy Conklin
2023. The Effect of Congruency and Frequency of Exposures on the Learning of L2 Binomials. Languages 9:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Sonbul, Suhad, Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, Kathy Conklin & Gareth Carrol
2023. “Bread and butter” or “butter and bread”? Nonnatives’ processing of novel lexical patterns in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:2 ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.