In recent years, applied linguists have been much concerned with the description of linguistic behaviour previously labelled as «deviant». In particular, a technique known as «error analysis» has been developed by means of which it is claimed access is gained to the «transitional competence» of the L2 learner thus making the description of the learner's «interlanguage» and the explanation of the systematic nature of the errors generated by its grammar possible. Such a Technique can, if its claims are justified, be of inestimable value to linguist, teacher and learner but equally, if its claims are false, can lead to invalid assumptions concerning the nature of the «interlanguage», the form of appropriate teaching materials and learning strategies employed by learners.
It is suggested here, that in addition to being based on a number of false assumptions and offering a partly spurious assistance to those engaged in the language learning process, error analysis is in itself, an inadmissable pseudoprocedure which purports to contain a methodology that is, in part, impossible in principle and in part, in practice.
Hence, we need to reconsider the status of the concept «interlanguage», the analytical techniques involved in its description and the validity of the claims made for both.
GLEASON H.A., An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. Holt. (New York), 1955, revised edn., 1961.
GLEASON H.A., Linguistics and English Grammar. Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc (New York), 1965.
HJELMSLEV L., Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1943.
HYMES D., On Communicative Competence, Original paper 1971 — exerpts in Pride & Holmes eds. 1972, 269–293.
JOHANSSON S., «The Identification and Evaluation of Errors in Foreign Languages : A Functional Approach», in Svartvik, 1973, 102–114.
LADO R., English Pattern Pratices. Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1958.
MILLER G. A., «Some Psychological Studies of Grammar», in de Cecco, ed. 1967, 38–55.
NEMSER W. J., «Approximative Systems of Foreign Language Learners», in IRAL, 91, 1971, 115–123.
PRIDE J. B. & HOLMES J. eds., Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1972.
QUINE W.V.O., From a logical point of view. Harvard UP, 1953, revized edn Harper & Row, New York, 1961.
WEINREICH U., Languages in contact. Mouton & Co. (The Hague), 1953.
WEINREICH U., «Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?», article in Word, 101, 1952, 388–400.
THORNE J.P., «Stylistics and generative grammars», in Journal of Linguistics, I, 1, 1965, 49–59.
SVARTIK J., Errata-Papers in Error Analysis. CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1973.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
THEWISSEN, JENNIFER
2013. Capturing L2 Accuracy Developmental Patterns: Insights From an Error‐Tagged EFL Learner Corpus. The Modern Language Journal 97:S1 ► pp. 77 ff.
CHAN, ALICE Y. W.
2010. Toward a Taxonomy of Written Errors: Investigation Into the Written Errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL Learners. TESOL Quarterly 44:2 ► pp. 295 ff.
Péry-Woodley, Marie-Paule
1991. Writing in L1 and L2: analysing and evaluating learners' texts. Language Teaching 24:2 ► pp. 69 ff.
Richards, Jack C.
1980. Second Language Acquisition: Error Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1 ► pp. 91 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.