Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 63 (1984) ► pp.121
References (48)
References
BERG, M.R. & HARRIS, L.J. (1980) : The effect of experimenter location and subject anxiety on cerebral activation as measured by lateral eye movements. Neuropsychologia 181, 89–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BIALYSTOK, E. & FROHLICH, M. (1978) : Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 621, 327–336.Google Scholar
BROWN, H.D. (1973) : Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning 231, 231–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1977) : Cognitive and affective characteristics of good language learners. In C. Henning (ed.) : Proceedings of the Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum. Los Angeles : UCLA, 349–354.Google Scholar
(1980) : Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.) : Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
CHASTAIN, K. (1975) : An examination of the basic assumption of 'individualized' instruction. The Modern Language Journal 591, 334–355.Google Scholar
CHICKERING, A.W. (1976) : The double bind of field dependence/independence in program alternatives for educational development. In S. Messick, et al.. : Individuality in Learning. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 79–89.Google Scholar
CORDER, S.P. (1976) : The study of interlanguage. In G. Nickel (ed.) : Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics, vol. 21. Stuttgart : Hochschulverlag, 9–34.Google Scholar
CRONBACH, L.J. & SNOW, R.E. (1977) : Aptitudes and Instructional Methods. A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York : Irvington.Google Scholar
DE FAZIO, V.J. (1973) : Field articulation differences in language abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 251, 351–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DILLER, K.C. (1976) : Criteria for adapting language teaching methods to the learning styles and abilities of students. In G. Nickel (ed.) : Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics, vol. 31. Stuttgart : Hochschulverlag, 341–351.Google Scholar
DOYLE, W. (1978) : Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education 51, 163–198.Google Scholar
GENESEE, F. (1978) : Individual differences in second language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review 341, 490–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GENESEE, F. & HAMAYAN, E. (1980) : Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Pyscholinguistics 11, 95–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, K.M. & BLACMAN, S. (1978) : Cognitive Style : Five Approaches and Relevant Research. New York : John Wiley.Google Scholar
GRIPPIN, P.C. (1973) : Field independence and reflection-impulsitivity as mediators of performance on a programmed learning task with and without strong prompts. Paper presented to the American Psychological Association (University Microfilms 73–19, 674).Google Scholar
GRIPPIN, P.C. & OHNMACHT, F.W. (1974) : Field independence and dogmatism as mediators of performance on a programmed learning task with and without strong prompts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Reproduction Service ED 095220).Google Scholar
HANSEN, J. & STANSFIELD, C. (1981) : The relationship of field-dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning 311, 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HARTNETT, D.D. (1975) : The Relation of Cognitive Style and Hemispheric Preference to Deductive and Inductive Second Language Learning. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
HAUPTMAN, P.C. (1971) : A structural approach versus a situational approach, to foreign-language teaching. Language Learning 211, 235–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HOSENFELD, C. (1979) : A learning-teaching view of second language instruction. Foreign Language Annals 121, 51–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KAGAN, D.M. (1980) : Syntactic complexity and cognitive style. Applied Psycholinguistics 11, 111–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KAGAN, S. & BURIEL, R. (1977) : Field dependence-independence and Mexican-American culture and education. In J.L. Martinez (ed.) : Chicano Psychology. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D. (1981) : Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acguisition and learning. In : K.C. Diller (ed.) : Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitutde. Rowley (Mass.) : Newbury House, 155–175.Google Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D., SELIGER, H. & HARTNETT, D. (1974) : Two studies in adult second language learning. Kritikon Litterarum 31, 220–228.Google Scholar
LEFEVER, M.M. & EHRI, L.C. (1976) : The relationship between field independence and sentence disambiguation ability. Journal of Psycho Unguis tic Research 51, 99–104.Google Scholar
LINN, M.C. & KYLLONEN, P. (1981) : The field-dependence-independence construct : some, one or none. Journal of Educational Psychology 731, 261–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NAIMAN, N., FROHLICH, M., STERN, H. & TODESCO, A. (1978) : The Good Language Learner. Toronto : Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
NELSON, K. (1981) : Individual differences in language development : implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology 171, 170–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PACKER, J. & BAIN, J.D. (1978) : Cognitive style and teacher-student compatibility. Journal of Educational Psychology 701, 864–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PETERS, A.M. (1977) : Language Learning strategies : Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 531, 560–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PETERSON, P.L. & SWING, S.R. (in press) : Beyond time on task : students' reports of their thought processes during direct instruction. The Elementary School Journal.
POOLE, M.E. (1978) : Exploration of relationship between linguistic, cognitive and verbal processing. Psychological Reports 431, 639–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ROSENSHINE, B. & FURST, N.F. (1973) : The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R.M.W. Travers (ed.) : Second Hanbook for Research on Teaching. Chicago : Rand McNally, 122–183.Google Scholar
SMITH, P.D. (1970) : A comparison of the Cognitive and Audiolingual Approaches to Foreign Language Instruction. The Pennsylvania Foreign Language Project. Philadelphia : Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
TRIM, J.L.M., RICHTERICH, R., VAN EK, J.A. & WILKINS, D.A. (1980) : Systems development in adult language language learning : a European unit/credit system for modern language learning by adults. Strasbourg : Council of Europe.Google Scholar
TUCKER, W., HAMAYAN, E. & GENESEE, F. (1976) : Affective, cognitive and social factors in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review 231, 214–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VALETTE, R. (1969) : The Pennsylvania project, its conclusions and its implications. The Modern Language Journal 531, 396–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VAN EK, J.A. (1975) : The threshold level in a European unit/credit system for modern language learning by adults. Strasbourg, Council of Europe.Google Scholar
VAN ELS, T., EXTRA, G., VAN OS, C. & BONGAERTS, T. (1977) : Handboek voor de Toegepaste Taalkunde. Groningen : Wolters-Noordhoff. Google Scholar
WAPNER, S. (1976) : Process and context in the conception of cognitive style. In S. Messick, et al. (eds) : Individuality in Learning. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 73–78.Google Scholar
WELLS, W. (1978) : Aptitude à l'apprentissage d'une langue second et style cognitif. Paper presented at the Fifth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (Abstract in LLBA 12, n° 13, AILA Suppl. n° 2, p. 108a).Google Scholar
WESCHE, M.B. (1981) : Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods and diagnosis of learning problems. In K.C. Diller (ed.) : Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley (Mass.) : Newbury House, 119–154.Google Scholar
WITKIN, H.A. (1976) : Cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher-student relations. In S. Messick, et al. (eds) : Individuality in Learning. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 38–72.Google Scholar
WITKIN, H.A., DYK, R.B., FATERSON, H.F., GOODENOUGH, D.R. & KARP, S.A. (1962) : Psychological Differentiation : Studies of Development. New York : John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WITKIN, H.A. & GOODENOUGH, D.R. (1981) : Cognitive Styles : Essence and Origins. Field Dependence and Field Independence. New York : International Universities Press.Google Scholar
WITKIN, H.A., GOODENOUGH, D.R. & OLTMAN, P.K. (1979) : Psychological differentiation : current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 371, 1127–1145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WITKIN, H.A., MOORE, C.A., GOODENOUGH, D.R. & COX, P.W. (1977) : Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 471, 1–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Iizuka, Takehiro & Robert DeKeyser
2024. Scrutinizing LLAMA D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.