Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 66 (1985) ► pp. 2548
References

Bibliography

Alvarez, G.
(1979): Bilan critique des méthodes actuelles d'en¬seignement du français et orientations nouvelles. Québec français 671, 62–67.Google Scholar
(1981): Niveau-seuil et enseignement fonctionnel du français. Le français dans le monde 1621, 58–62.Google Scholar
Beheydt, L.
(1974): Foreign Language Teaching Methodology: a critical discussion. I.T.L. 23, 39–57.Google Scholar
Chastain, K.
(1969): The Audio-lingual Habit Theory versus the Cognitive Code-Learning Theory: Some Theoretical Considerations. IRAL vol. 7, 2,97–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coste, D.
e.a. (1976): Un Niveau-Seuil. Strasbourg: Conseil de l'Europe.Google Scholar
Davies, N.
(1976): Receptive versus productive skills in foreign language learning. Modem Language Journal 601,440–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978): Putting receptive skills first. An investigation into sequencing in modern language learning. Linköping University, Sweden, 1–34.Google Scholar
Engels, L.K.
( 1970): The function of Grammar in the Teaching of English as a foreign Language. I.T.L.. 101,11–24.Google Scholar
(1975): Rote Learning and Rule Learning in Foreign-Language Teaching. I.T.L. 27, 9–18.Google Scholar
(1979): Kritische beschouwingen bij recente theorieën over het vreemde-talen-leren, in: Verslag van het zevende colloquium van docenten in de neerlandistiek aan buitenlandse universiteiten. 's Gravenhage-Hasselt, 119–130.Google Scholar
Engels, L.K., T. De Bisschop et B. van Beckhoven
(1983): Internalizing syntactic rules by means of iconic mediation, conférence présentée au 15th AIMAV-Colloquium, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M.
(1979): The functional-Notional Syllabus: Promise, Problems, Practice. English Teaching Forum april, 11–20.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M. et Ch. Brumfit
(1983): The Functional-Notional Approach, From Theory to Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gary, J. et N. Gary
(1981): Caution: Talking may be dangerous to your linguistic health. The case for a much greater emphasis on listening comprehension in foreign language instruction. IRAL 191, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koster, C.J. & J. F. Matter
(1983): Vreemde talen leren en onderwijzen. Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.
(1981): Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1982): Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. & Tr. Terrell
(1983): The Natural Approach. Pergamon/Alemany.Google Scholar
Loonen, P.
(1979): Functioneel Taalgebruik in het Onderwijs. L.T. 338/339, 17–21.Google Scholar
Marton, W.
(1974): Syllabus Design and the Cognitive Approach to Foreign-Language Learning. I.T.L. 25–26,19–34.Google Scholar
Menting, J.P.
(1979): De taalgebruik-benadering van het VTO. L.T. 338/339 ,21–29.Google Scholar
Michiels, A.
(1975): Algorithme et Enseignement de la Grammaire. I.T.L. 271,1–7.Google Scholar
Nas, G.L.J.
(1977): Het Drempelnivomodel als afspiegeling van Taalgebruik. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in artikelen 31, 87–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nord, J.R.
(1977): Listening fluency before speaking: An alternative paradigm. Paper presented at the Foreign Lanugage Conference. University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.Google Scholar
Omaggio A.
(1983): Methodology in Transition: The new Focus on Proficiency. Modern Language Journal 671, 330–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostyn, P. et P. Godin
Apprendre à communiquer en langues étrangères. IRAL (à paraître).
Perez, M.
(1980): L'enseignement du français, langue seconde au Québec. Quebec français mars 801,62–64.Google Scholar
Postovsky, V.
( 1974): Effects of delay in oral practice at the beginning of second language learning. Modern Language Journal 581,229–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975): On paradoxes in foreign language teaching. Modern Language Journal 591, 18–22.Google Scholar
Ridjanovic, M.
(1983): How to Learn a Language, Say English, in a Couple of Months. Forum XXI, 1, 8–13.Google Scholar
Roberts, J.T.
(1982): Recent Development in ELT, Part I. Language Teaching april 82,94–110 et Part II1, July 82,174–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roulet, E.
(1977): Un Niveau-Seuil, présentation et guide d'emploi. Conseil de l'Europe: Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Rubin, J.
(1981): Study of Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics 2, 2,117–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schouten-Van Parreren, C.
(1983): Wisseling van de Wacht in de Vreemde-talen-didactiek. L.T. januari 22–29.Google Scholar
Sciarone, A.G.
( 1979): Woordjes leren in het vreemdetalenonderwijs. D. Coutinho, Muiderberg.Google Scholar
Shaw, A.M.
(1977): Foreign-Language Syllabus Development: Some Recent Approaches. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Abstracts, vol. 10, 4,217–233.Google Scholar
Spoelders, M.
(1974): Cognitive Foreign Language Learning: The Educationist's Belief in the Learners Cognitive Capacities. I.T.L. 25–26, 7–18.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.
(1979): Can Communication be Taught? Poznan (mimeo).Google Scholar
Van Ek, J.A.
(1975): The Threshold Level. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(1976): The Threshold Level for Modern Language Learning in Schools. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Els, T.
e.a. (1977): Handboek voor de Toegepaste Taalkunde. Wolters-Noordhof, Groningen.Google Scholar
Von Elek, T.
(1974): Experiments in Teaching Foreign Language Grammar by Different Methods. I.T.L. 25–26, 93–96.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.A.
(1976): Notional Syllabuses. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Yalden, J.
(1983): The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design & Implementation, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, G.
(1978): Qu'est-ce qu'une grammaire pédagogique? Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, Perspectives sur la didactique des langues étrangères en RFA, juillet-sept. 781,96–109.Google Scholar