Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 87/88 (1990) ► pp.95–119

Simplification in Transplanted Languages

A Study of Motion verbs in American Czech

| Connecticut College New London
Published online: 1 January 1990
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.87-88.05eck
References
Beniak, Edouard and Mougeon, Raymond
(1984): Possessive à and de in Informal Ontarion French: a Long-standing Case of Linguistic Variation. In Philip Baldi (ed.), Papers from the XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, pp. 15–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
(1976): Aspect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cummins, George
(1983): On the Aspects of Motion Verbs in Russian and Czech, in Folia Slavica 6, no. 1–2, pp. 7–52.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy
(1977): The Problem of the Semi-speaker in Language Death, in International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121, pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
(1981): Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Eckert, Eva
(1988a): First Generation American Czech: A Sociolin-guistic Survey, in Language Problems and Language Planning 12, 2, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
(1988b): Motion Verbs and Motion Actions in Russian and Czech, in Russian Language Journal XLII, Nos. 141–143, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
(1989): Standard and Common Czech, in Bohemia pp. 84–93.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
(1959): Diglossia, in Word, pp. 325–340.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan
(1979): Language Shift, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gallant, James
(1979): Activity, Action, Act. ed. by Cheryl Brown. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, pp. 179–197.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A.
(1979): Language Function and Language Change in Minority Languages, in Journal of Italian Linguistics 41, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
(1982): Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harkins, William
(1953): A Modern Czech Grammar, New York King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Havránek B., Jedlička A.
(1963): Českcá mluvnice, Prague, SPN.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
(1956): Bilingualism in the Americas: A Bibliography and Research Guide. American Dialect Society, University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
(1969): The Norwegian Language in America: A Study of Bilingual Behaviour. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Michael
(1976): Contemporary Czech. Ann Arbor, Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Henzl, Věra
(1981): Slavic Languages in the New Environment, in Language in the U.S.A.., ed. by Charles A. Ferguson, Cambridge, England and New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jahner, E.
(1980): Language Change and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Lakota Verbs of Movement, in Languages in Conflict: Linguistic Acculturation of the Great Plains, ed. by Paul Schach, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Frances
(1977): Finnish in America: A Case Study in Monogenerational Language Change, in Ben G. Blount and Mary Sanchez, Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Change, 173, 184. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
King, Ruth
(1984): Linguistic Variation and Language Contact: A Study of the French Spoken in four Newfoundland Communities. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, Victoria, B.C., July 15–20.Google Scholar
Kochis, Bruce
(1980): Czech in Nebraska, in Languages in Conflict, ed. by Paul Shach, University of Nebraska Press, pp. 111–118.Google Scholar
Kucera, Henry
(1976): Czechs and Nebraska, Quiz Graphic Arts, Inc. Ord, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Lamiroy, B.
(1988): Les verbs de movement en francais et en espagnol. Amsterdam, J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Languages in Conflict
(1980): Linguistic Acculturation of the Great Plains, ed. by Paul Schach, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
The Loss of Language Skills
(1982): ed. by Lambert R.D. and B.F. Freed, Newbury House Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
(1968): Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, Julianne
(1984): Sociolinguistic Factors in the Direction of Language Change, in Language Problems and Language Planning 8, 3, pp. 280–291.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Leslie
(1985): Linguistic Change, in Journal of Linguistics 211, pp. 339–384.Google Scholar
Mougeon R., Beniak E. and D. Valois
(1985): A Sociolinguistic Study of Language Contact, Shift and Change, in Linguistics, v. 231–3, pp. 455–488.Google Scholar
(1981): Levelling of the 3sg./pl.verbal distinctions in Ontarian French. In James P. Lantolf and Gregory B. Stone (eds.), Current Research in Romance Languages, pp. 126–44. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana
(1981): Bilingualism and the Vernacular, in B. Hartford, A. Valdman and C. Foster (eds.), Issues in International Bilingual Education: The Role of the Vernacular, New York, Plenum.Google Scholar
Šára M., Šarová J., Bytel A.
(1970): Cestina pro cizince. Czech for English Speaking Students. Praha, SPN.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel
(1982a): The Ethnography of Communication. An Introduction. University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Sova, Milos
(1962): A Practical Czech Course for English Speaking Students, Prague, SPN.Google Scholar
Stripp, M.G.and W. Belein
(1985): Bilingual Linguistic Systems Revisited, Linguistics, v. 23–1, pp. 123–136.Google Scholar
Townsend, Charles
(1981): Czech through Russian. Slavica Publishers, Inc., Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
(1983): On Dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
(1957): Verbs and Times, in The Philosophical Review 661, pp. 143–160.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
(1968): Languages in Contact, The Hague - Paris.Google Scholar