Cover not available
Article published In:
Études offertes à Karel van den Eynde: Volume I. Études de linguistique générale et romane: l’approche pronominale et méthodes quantitatives
Sous la direction de Nicole Delbecque et Pierre Swiggers
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 95/96] 1992
► pp. 187–205

Pronomina en Pronominal Approach

| Aspirant van het N.F.W.O.

Article language: Dutch

Published online: 1 January 1992
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.95-96.09dew
References
Bach E.
(1970), Problominalization, in: Linguistic Inquiry 11, 121–122.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste C., Delofeu J., Stefanini J., Van den Eynde K.
(1984), Pronom et syntaxe, l'approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris, Selaf.Google Scholar
Bloomfield L.
(1961;1933), Language. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto.Google Scholar
Bolinger D.
(1977), Pronouns and Repeated Nouns. Indiana University Linguistics Club. Bloomington.Google Scholar
(1979), Pronouns in Discourse, in: Givón T. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 121, Discourse and Syntax. New York, San Francisco, London, 289–309.Google Scholar
Bosch P.
(1983), Agreement and Anaphora. A Study of the Role of Pronouns in Syntax and Discourse. London.Google Scholar
Broeders E., Eggermont C., Van den Eynde K., Vangilbergen L.
(1988), The Pronominal Approach in NLP: A Pronominal Feature Analysis of Coordination in French, in: Computers and Translation 31, 177–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris Z.S.
(1966;1947), Structural Linguistics. Chicago, London.Google Scholar
Harré R. #x0026; Mühlhäusler P.
(1990), Pronouns and People: The Linguistic construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hartshorne C. #x0026; Weiss P.
(eds.) (1965), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volumes I and II1. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hinds J.
(1977), Paragraph Structure and Pronominalization, in: Papers in Linguistics 101, 77–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiz H.
(1969), Referentials, in: Semiotica I1, 136–166.Google Scholar
Maes A. & Van den Eynde K.
(1981), Pronominale Paradigmen en Basissemantiek in de verbale Constructies. Beknopte Schets voor een pronominale Syntaxis van het Nederlands, in: Handelingen van het XXXIIIste Vlaams Filologencongres, Antwerpen, 346–354.Google Scholar
Milner J.-C.
(1973), Arguments linguistiques.Google Scholar
Quine W.V.O.
(1964), From a Logical Point of View. 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Reinhart T.
(1976), The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Ph. D. diss. M.I.T..Google Scholar
Stéfanini J.
(1976), Jules César Scaliger et son De causis linguae Latinae, in: Parret H. (ed.), History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
Swiggers P.
(1983), Qu'est-ce qu'une théorie (en) linguistique?, in: Modèles linguistiques 51, 3–15.Google Scholar