The importance of prescriptivism in the development of “schemes for respelling” in 18th century pronouncing dictionaries
This paper will give an overview of the evolution of phonic descriptions in 18th century English pronouncing dictionaries, and of the role of prescriptivism within this process. The prescriptive attitudes of orthoepists during this period led them to adopt increasingly detailed and precise transcription systems, and this same prescriptivism, informed by graphocentrism, influenced these systems as well as the individual transcriptions.
Our aim is to establish that the prescriptive tendencies that hardened in 18th century England (during the period which saw the rise of what would come to be known as Received Pronunciation) served as a catalyst for a more systematic approach to describing spoken language and graphophonemic conventions. This is linked to prescriptivism as a tool for social demarcation, and a pedagogical necessity, but also as the hallmark of the traditional, accretive approach to knowledge, of which graphocentric bias is one example.
References
Sources
Bailey, Nathan
1740 An Universal Etymological Dictionary. 9th edition. London: D. Midwinter, et al.
Buchanan, James
1757 Linguae Britannicae Vera Pronunciatio. London: A. Millar.
Cooper, Thomas
1565 Thesaurus linguae Romanae and Britannicae. London: Londini.
Dyche, Thomas
1707 Guide to the English Tongue. Paisley.
Kenrick, William
1773 A New Dictionary of the English Language. London: John and Francis Rivington and others.
Johnson, Samuel
1747 The Plan of a Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. and P. Knapton et al.
Johnson, Samuel
1755 Dictionary of the English Language. London: Strahan.
Johnston, William
1764 Pronouncing and Spelling Dictionary…Together with an Introduction, and an Appendix, Containing Many New and Useful Observations on the Sounds of the Letters. London: W. Johnston.
Mulcaster, Richard
1582 The First Part of the Elementarie. London.Thomas Vautroullier
Sheridan, Thomas
1762 A course of lectures on elocution: together with two dissertations on language and some other tracts relative to those subjects. London: Strahan.
Sheridan, Thomas
1780 A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. Dodsley et al.
Spence, Thomas
1782 Thĭ Hĭstĭre ŏv Kruzonea, ŏr Rŏbĭnsĭn Kruzo’z Ilĭnd. Nukăsĭl: T. Saint.
Walker, John
1791 A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary. London: G. G. J. and J. Robinson.
Auroux, Sylvain
1994 La révolution technologique de la grammatisation: Introduction à l’histoire des sciences du langage (Philosophie et langage). Liège: Mardaga.
Bacon, Wallace
1964 “
The elocutionary career of Thomas Sheridan (1719–1788)”.
Speech Monographs (XXXI) 1: 1–53.
Colapinto, John
2013 “
Giving Voice”.
The New Yorker (LXXXIX) 3: 48–57.
Beal, Joan
1999 English pronunciation in the eighteenth century: Thomas Spence’s Grand repository of the English language. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Dobson, Eric John
1957 English Pronunciation, 1500–1700: Phonology, Clarendon Press.
Jones, Charles
2006 English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Merrilees, Brian
1996 “
The Shape of the Medieval Dictionary Entry”, (
[URL]) Accessed June 13th, 2013.
Pullum, Geoffrey
2004 “
Ideology, Power, and Linguistic Theory”. Santa Cruz University of California.
Scragg, Donald George
1974 A History of English Spelling. Manchester University Press.
Sheldon, Esther
1946 “
Pronouncing systems in eighteenth-century dictionaries”.
Language: 27–41.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2022.
Methodological approaches to the study of codification, prescription, and prescriptivism.
Studia Neophilologica 94:3
► pp. 334 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.