Language myths and the historiography of French
Sociolinguists in the UK have recently come to recognise the importance of language mythologies (shared assumptions about language whose factual status is not established, but which are widely prevalent and support and reinforce each other), for they can be shown to have a significant effect on the way speakers use their language on a day-to-day basis. Richard Watts has recently explored the effect of such myths, not on ordinary speakers but on writers of histories of English. He has shown that certain fundamental language myths have hardened into ideology and have had a profound effect on the historiography of English. This paper looks at the historiography of French from a similar perspective and shows how profoundly language myths via standard ideology have shaped the way histories of French have traditionally been written. Although the overt effects of this ideology have weakened in recent decades, contemporary histories of the language still show the effects of this ideology in their treatment of the vernacular and in their underlying approach to language change.
References (34)
References
Aiol = Normand, Jacques, and Gaston Raynaud (eds.). 2012. Aiol: Chanson de geste (Éd. 1877). Paris: Société des Anciens Textes Français.
Auroux, Sylvain. 2007. La Question de l’origine des langues. Paris: PUF.
Bauer, Laurie, and Peter Trudgill. 1998. Language Myths. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
Berschin, Helmut, Josef Felixberger, Hans Gœbl. 2008. Französische Sprachgeschichte (Überarbeitete Aufgabe), Hildesheim: Olms.
Brunot, Ferdinand. 1905. Histoire de la langue française. Vol. 1. Paris: A. Colin.
Brunot, Ferdinand. 1966–. Histoire de la langue française des origens à nos jours. Paris: A. Colin.
Cerquiglini, Bernard. 2007. Une Langue orpheline. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Chaurand, Jacques. (éd.). 1999. Nouvelle Histoire de la langue française. Paris: Seuil.
Cohen, Marcel. 1987. Histoire d’une langue: le français. Paris: Editions sociales.
Dauzat, Albert. 1930. Histoire de la langue française. Paris: Payot.
Dauzat, Albert. 1948. Les Etapes de la language française. Paris: PUF (Que Sais-Je).
Guiraud, Pierre. 1966. Le Moyen Français. Paris: PUF (Que Sais-Je).
Heers, Jacques. 2008. Le Moyen âge, Une imposture. Paris: Perrin.
Houdebine-Gravaud, Anne Marie. 2002. “L’imaginaire linguistique: un niveau d’analyse et un point de vue théorique”. In L’Imaginaire linguistique, Anne Marie Houdebine-Gravaud (ed.), 9–21. Paris: L’Harmattan (Langue & Parole).
Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language ideology and linguistic differentiation”. In Regimes of language: ideologies, polities and identities. Paul V.Kroskrity (ed.), 35–83. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Jensen, Frede. 1990. Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Tûbingen: Niemeyer.
Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von prachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.
Littré, Emile. 1873–1878. Dictionnaire de la langue française. 4 vols. Paris: Hachette.
Lodge, R. Anthony. 2013. “La frontière oc/oil en Auvergne au Moyen âge: fiction idéologique?” In Romania. Réalité(s) et concepts. Anne-Marie Chabrolle-Cerretini (éd.), 21–35. Paris: Lambert-Lucas.
Milroy, James. 2003. “On the discourse of historical linguistics: language-internal explanation and language ideologies”. Forum for Modern Language Studies 39: 357–370.
Milroy, James. 2007. “The ideology of the standard language”. In The Routledge Companion to Socviolinguistics, C. Llamas, L. Mullany, & P. Stockwell (eds.), 133–139. London / New York: Routledge.
Milroy, James and Lesley Milroy. 1999. Authority in Language (
Third Edition
). London: Routledge.
Paris, Gaston. 1889. “Les parlers de France”. Romania 17: 475–89.
Rey, Alain, Fréderic Duval, and Gilles Siouffi. 2007. Mille Ans de la langue française. Paris: Perrin.
Romaine, Suzanne, and Euen Reid. 1976. “Glottal sloppiness? A sociolinguistic view of urban speech in Scotland”. Teaching English 9 (3): 12–18.
Straka, Georges. 1952. “La prononciation parisienne. Ses différents aspects”. Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg 30: 212–225.
Tristan = Ewert, Alfred (ed.). 1967. Tristan: The Romance of Tristran by Beroul. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wartburg, Walter von 1962. Evolution et structure de la langue française. Berne: Francke.
Watts, Richard J. 2000. “Mythical strands in the ideology of prescriptivism”. In The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800, L. Wright (ed.), 29–48. Cambridge: CUP.
Watts, Richard J. 2011. Language Myths and the History of English. Oxford: OUP.
Watts, Richard J. 2012. “Language myths”. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, J.M. Hernández-Campoy and J.C. Conde-silvestre (eds.), 586–606. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marin I. Herzog. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Wüest, Jakob. 2003. “Evolution des frontières des langues romanes: la Galloromania”. In Romanische Sprachgeschichte, t. 1, Gerhard Ernst, Martin-Dietrich Glessgen et al. (eds.), 646–657. NewYork: de Gruyter.
Yaguello, Marina. 1988. Catalogue des idées reçues sur la langue. Paris: Seuil.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Jansen, Silke, Sonja Higuera del Moral, Jessica Stefanie Barzen, Pia Reimann & Markus Opolka
2021.
Mind and Language Between the Organic and the Inorganic. In
Demystifying Bilingualism,
► pp. 115 ff.
Jansen, Silke, Sonja Higuera del Moral, Jessica Stefanie Barzen, Pia Reimann & Markus Opolka
2021.
National Narratives as Language Myths. In
Demystifying Bilingualism,
► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.