Article published in:
Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 79–101

Metapragmatics of humor

Variability, negotiability and adaptability in humorous monologues

| University of Alicante, GRIALE Research Group
The main aim of this paper is to propose a theoretical model for the study of humor as a metapragmatic ability, the so-called metapragmatics of humor (MH). After offering a short overview, humor will be analyzed from the conception of metapragmatics according to Verschueren (1999), (2000), (2009). Considering humor as a continuous choice where variability, negotiability, and adaptability become key notions, the knowledge resources in the General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH) (Attardo and Raskin 1991; Attardo 2001a, 2008; Ruiz-Gurillo, 2012) will be understood as metapragmatic awareness processes. Our proposal intends to integrate the productive process of the writer/speaker along with the interpretative process of the reader/listener. Finally, this metapragmatics of humor will be applied to humorous monologues.
Keywords: humor, metapragmatics, pragmatic awareness, , humorous monologue
Published online: 24 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.05rui
References

References

Corpus:

DY=Buenafuente, Andreu 2009 Digo yo [I say] (Los monólogos de La Sexta). Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
SD=Buenafuente, Andreu 2010 Sigo diciendo [I continue to say] (Los monólogos de La Sexta). Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
HG=Buenafuente, Andreu 2011 Hablar es gratis [Speaking is free of charge] (Los monólogos de La Sexta). Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar

Bibliography:

Attardo, S. and V. Raskin
1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model”, Humor, 4 (3-4): 293–347.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Ch. F. Hempelmann and S. Di Maio
2002 “Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modelling incongruities and their resolutions”, Humor, 15 (1): 3–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001a Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b “Humor and Irony in Interaction: From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection”. In Say not Say: New perspectives on miscommunication, ed. by Anolli, L., R. Ciceri and G. Riva, 165–185. Amsdterdam, IOS Press.Google Scholar
2008 “A primer for the linguistics of humor”, In The Primer of Humor Research. ed. by Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio
and 2002 Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1998 “Metapragmatics”. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jakob Mey, 581–586. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, Elena and Empar Tusón
1999 Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
(1986): El decir y lo dicho. Polifonía de la enunciación. Barcelona: Paidós (1ª ed. 1984).Google Scholar
Gombert, Jean Émile
1992 Metalinguistic development. New York: Harverster Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael and Suzanne Carroll, S.
1986: Lenguaje y situación. Variedades del lenguaje y sus contextos sociales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000 Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Lucy, John
1993 Reflexive language. Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
2008 “Theory of humor and practice of humor research: Editor’s notes and thoughts”. In The Primer of Humor Research. ed. by Victor Raskin, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme
2004 The Linguistic Analyses of Jokes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Rosique, Susana
2009: «Una propuesta neogriceana». In Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Xose A. Padilla-García (eds.): 109–132.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Mª Belén Alvarado-Ortega
(eds.) 2013 Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Xose A. Padilla García
(eds.) 2009: Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2012 La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid, Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
2013 “Narrative strategies in Buenafuente’s humorous monologues” In Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Mª Belén Alvarado-Ortega (eds.) Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. 107–140, Amsterdam, John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Infiriendo el humor. Un modelo de análisis para el español. Revista CLAC (Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación) 59, 148–162.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
2000 “Notes on The Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use”, Pragmatics, 10, 4, 439–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “The pragmatics perspective”. In Key Notions for Pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, Vol. 1. Ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Östman. 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef and Frank Brisard
2009 “Adaptability”. In Key Notions for Pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, Vol. 1. Ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Östman. 28–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Attardo, Salvatore
2020.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2020. Evidentiality and humor in Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 302 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.