Cover not available
Part of
Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 79–101

Metapragmatics of humor

Variability, negotiability and adaptability in humorous monologues

| University of Alicante, GRIALE Research Group
The main aim of this paper is to propose a theoretical model for the study of humor as a metapragmatic ability, the so-called metapragmatics of humor (MH). After offering a short overview, humor will be analyzed from the conception of metapragmatics according to Verschueren (1999), (2000), (2009). Considering humor as a continuous choice where variability, negotiability, and adaptability become key notions, the knowledge resources in the General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH) (Attardo and Raskin 1991; Attardo 2001a, 2008; Ruiz-Gurillo, 2012) will be understood as metapragmatic awareness processes. Our proposal intends to integrate the productive process of the writer/speaker along with the interpretative process of the reader/listener. Finally, this metapragmatics of humor will be applied to humorous monologues.
Keywords: humor, metapragmatics, pragmatic awareness, General Theory of Verbal Humor , humorous monologue
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.From metapragmatic code to metapragmatic awareness
  • 3.A proposal for metapragmatics of humor
    • 3.1Adaptability as a key of metapragmatic awareness
      • 3.1.1Variability
      • 3.1.2Negotiability
      • 3.1.3Adaptability
      • 3.1.4Metapragmatic awareness indicators
    • 3.2Metapragmatic awareness of humor
      • 3.2.1Variability of humor
      • 3.2.2Negotiability of humor
      • 3.2.3Adaptability of humor
      • 3.2.4Metapragmatic awareness of humor
  • 4.Metapragmatics of humorous monologues
    • 4.1Metapragmatics from the writer/speaker
    • 4.2Metapragmatics from the reader/listener
    • 4.3Metapragmatic clues to humorous awareness
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.05rui
References (29)
References
Corpus:
DY=Buenafuente, Andreu. 2009. Digo yo [I say] (Los monólogos de La Sexta). Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
SD=Buenafuente, Andreu. 2010. Sigo diciendo [I continue to say] (Los monólogos de La Sexta). Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
HG=Buenafuente, Andreu. 2011. Hablar es gratis [Speaking is free of charge] (Los monólogos de La Sexta). Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
Bibliography:
Attardo, S. and V. Raskin. 1991. “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model”, Humor, 4 (3-4): 293–347.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Ch. F. Hempelmann and S. Di Maio. 2002. “Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modelling incongruities and their resolutions”, Humor, 15 (1): 3–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2001a. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. “Humor and Irony in Interaction: From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection”. In Say not Say: New perspectives on miscommunication, ed. by Anolli, L., R. Ciceri and G. Riva, 165–185. Amsdterdam, IOS Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “A primer for the linguistics of humor”, In The Primer of Humor Research. ed. by Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio and grupo Val.Es.Co. 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 1998. “Metapragmatics”. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jakob Mey, 581–586. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, Elena and Empar Tusón. 1999. Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald (1986): El decir y lo dicho. Polifonía de la enunciación. Barcelona: Paidós (1ª ed., 1984).Google Scholar
Gombert, Jean Émile. 1992. Metalinguistic development. New York: Harverster Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael and Suzanne Carroll, S. 1986: Lenguaje y situación. Variedades del lenguaje y sus contextos sociales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Lucy, John. 1993. Reflexive language. Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 2008. “Theory of humor and practice of humor research: Editor’s notes and thoughts”. In The Primer of Humor Research. ed. by Victor Raskin, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme. 2004. The Linguistic Analyses of Jokes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Rosique, Susana. 2009: «Una propuesta neogriceana». In Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Xose A. Padilla-García (eds.): 109–132.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Mª Belén Alvarado-Ortega (eds.). 2013. Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Xose A. Padilla García. (eds.) 2009: Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor. 2012. La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid, Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Narrative strategies in Buenafuente’s humorous monologues” In Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor and Mª Belén Alvarado-Ortega (eds.) Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. 107–140, Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Infiriendo el humor. Un modelo de análisis para el español. Revista CLAC (Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación) 59, 148–162.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Notes on The Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use”, Pragmatics, 10, 4, 439–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “The pragmatics perspective”. In Key Notions for Pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, Vol. 1. Ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Östman. 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef and Frank Brisard. 2009. “Adaptability”. In Key Notions for Pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, Vol. 1. Ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Östman. 28–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Linares Bernabéu, Esther
2023. Introduction. In The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 335], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Garrote, Marta
2021. Análisis del humor en un corpus de habla infantil espontánea. Spanish in Context 18:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Attardo, Salvatore
2020. Humor. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2020. Evidentiality and humor in Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2023. Humor negotiation in interactional sequences in Spanish. In The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 335], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Exploring the Sociopragmatics of Online Humor [Topics in Humor Research, 12], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.