Truthiness and consequences
A cognitive pragmatic analysis of Stephen Colbert’s satirical strategies and effects
Using a discourse perspective on the production and reception of satire, this paper comparatively examines the different satirical goals and audiences of Stephen Colbert’s ironic satire on The Colbert Report (TCR) and at the 2006 White House Correspondents’ Dinner (WHCD). While some research suggests at least some viewers of TCR did not perceive it to be ironic satire, Colbert’s WHCD speech successfully and unambiguously achieved its satirical goals. The analysis shows that one possible explanation for the success of the speech, as opposed to the ambiguity of The Colbert Report, is that the speech’s structure facilitated both the immediate audience’s and potential mediated referee’s cognitive processing of satirical communication as described in Simpson’s (2003) discourse model of satire.
Article outline
- 1.Simpson’s discourse model of satire
- 2.Reading Colbert’s satire through a discourse lens
- 3.The White House Correspondents’ dinner
- 4.Prime phase
- 5.Dialectic phase
- 6.Uptake phase
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
References (26)
References
Anderson, James, and Amie D. Kincaid. 2013. “Media Subservience and Satirical Subservience: The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, the Propaganda Model and the Paradox of Parody.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 30: 171–188. 

Baumgartner, Jody C., and Jonathan S. Morris. 2008. “One ‘Nation,’ Under Stephen? The Effects of The Colbert Report on American Youth.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52: 622–43. 

Baym, Geoffrey. 2009. “Stephen Colbert’s Parody of the Postmodern.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-network Era, ed. By Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones, and Ethan Thompson, 124–144. New York: NYU Press.
Bell, Alan. 1991. The Language of News Media, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Booth, Wayne C. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Colbert, Stephen. 2009. ‘Colbert Roasts President Bush-2006 White House Correspondents’ Dinner’, April 29, 2006, [URL]. Accessed 19 December 2012.
Colebrook, Claire. 2004. Irony. New York: Routledge.
Colletta, Lisa. 2009. “Political Satire and Postmodern Irony in the Age of Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart.” Journal of Popular Culture 42: 856–874. 

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr., and Christin D. Izett. 2005. “Irony as Persuasive Communication.” In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, ed. by Herbert L. Colston and Albert N. Katz, 131–151. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey P. Jones, and Ethan Thomspon. 2009. “The State of Satire, the Satire of State.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones, & Ethan Thompson, 3–36. New York: NYU Press.
Gring-Pemble, Lisa, and Martha S. Watson. 2003. “The Rhetorical Limits of Satire: An Analysis of James Finn Garner’s Politically Correct Bedtime Stories
.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 89: 132–153. 

James, William C. 2008. “
Borat and Anti-Semitism.” Journal of Religion and Film 12. [URL]. Accessed 22 May 2012.
Johnson, Ann, Esteban del Rio and Alicia Kemmitt. 2010. “Missing the Joke: A Reception Analysis of Satirical Texts.” Communication, Culture & Critique 3: 396–415. 

Jones, Jeffrey P. 2009. “Believable Fictions: Redactional Culture and the Will to Truthiness.” In The Changing Faces of Journalism: Tabloidization, Technology and Truthiness, ed. by Barbie Zelizer, 127–143. New York: Routledge 2009.
Jones, Jeffrey P. 2010. Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Kaufer, David. 1977. “Irony and Rhetorical Strategy.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 10: 90–110.
Kreuz, Roger J., and Richard M. Roberts. 1993. “On Satire and Parody: The Importance of Being Ironic.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 8: 97–109. 

LaMarre, Heather L., Kristen D. Landreville, and Michael A. Beam. 2009. “The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in The Colbert Report
.” International Journal of Press/Politics 14: 212–231. 

LaMarre, Heather L., Kristen D. Landreville, Dannagal Young, and Nathan Gilkerson. 2014. “Humor Works in Funny Ways: Examining Satirical Tone as a Key Determinant in Political Humor Message Processing.” Mass Communication and Society 17: 400–423. 

Mohammed, Shaheed Nick. 2014. “’It-Getting’ in the Colbert Nation Online Forum.” Mass Communication and Society 17: 173–194. 

Pfaff, Kerry L., and Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. 1997. “Authorial Intentions in Understanding Satirical Texts.” Poetics 25: 45–70. 

Stewart, Craig O. 2013. “Strategies of Verbal Irony in Visual Satire: Reading The New Yorker’s ‘Politics of Fear’ Cover.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 26: 197–217. 

Todorov, Alexander, Shelly Chaiken, & Marlone D. Henderson. 2002. “The Heuristic-Systematic Model of Social Information Processing.” In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, ed. by James Price Dillard & Michael Pfau, 195–211. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1992. “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87: 53–76. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Zekavat, Massih
2021.
Employing satire and humor in facing a pandemic.
HUMOR 34:2
► pp. 283 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.