Article published in:
Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 193–214

Variability, adaptability and negotiability in conversational humor

A matter of gender

| University of Alicante, GRIALE Research Group

The present study has as its aim to analyze conversational utterances containing humor produced by men and women from the pragmatic perspective of Verschueren (2002), ultimately seeking to check whether discrepancies exist between the respective strategies that they use. In most cases, the interlocutors utilize different linguistic procedures to adapt their utterance –or not– to the humorous mode, by means of various conversational strategies that will depend both on gender and on the contextual situation. It all is determined by the nature of the corpus gathered as well as by the concepts of variability, adaptability and negotiability described by Verschueren (1999, 2002). Briz and the Val.Es.Co. Group’s Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales [Corpus of Colloquial Conversations], which is currently going through a digitization process, was used to achieve our aims. The analysis showed us that, when humor appears, each gender’s identity is defined through different strategies and procedures to adapt to the context.

Keywords: negotiability, adaptability, variability, conversational strategies, image
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The phases and linguistic elements of humor in conversation
  • 3.Variability, negotiability and adaptability: conversational strategies in humorous utterances
  • 4.Gender identity: men and women in conversation
  • 5.Humorous analysis of the conversation of men and women
    • 5.1Linguistic procedures and data
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.10alv
References

Corpus:

Briz, Antonio & Grupo Val.Es.Co
2002 Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
2002 (digital). Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales.Google Scholar

Bibliography:

Alvarado, M. Belén
2006 “Las marcas de la ironía.” In Interlingüística, 16. Online.Google Scholar
2009 “Ironía y cortesía.” In En Ruiz Gurillo L. & X. Padilla (eds.). Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. 333–345. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010 Las fórmulas rutinarias del español: teoría y aplicaciones. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Una propuesta de estudio para el humor en la conversación coloquial.” ELUA, 26, pp. 7–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Failed humor in conversational utterances in Spanish: a matter of (im)politeness.” In Ruiz Gurillo, L. & Alvarado Ortega, B.: Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Humor y género: Análisis de conversaciones entre mujeres.” Feminismos, 24, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
2015 “Independencia y fórmulas rutinarias: reestructuración de la Esfera III.” RESLA. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28:1.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
2001a Humorous Texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin. Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b “Humor and irony in interaction: from mode adoption to failure of detection.” In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri & G. Riva (eds.): Say not to say: new perspectives on miscommunication. 166–186.Google Scholar
2008 “A primer for the linguistics of humor.” In Raskin, V. (ed.): The primer of humor research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore & Victor Raskin
1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” In HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 4. 293–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy
2009a “Responses to failed humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1825–1836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b “Impolite responses to failed humor.” In Humor in interaction, Neal Norrick and Chiaro (eds.), 143–163. Amsterdan/Philadelphia. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1978, 1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Oxford. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coser, Rose
(1960): “Laughter among colleagues: A study of the social functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital.” Psychiatry 23: 83–91.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisterhold, Jodi, Attardo, Salvatore and Boxer, Diana
2006 “Reactions to irony in discourse: evidence fo the least disruption principle.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1239–1256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2000 “Functions of humor in the conversation of men and women.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 32. 709–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “The pragmatics of humor support.” Humor 14–1: 55–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2006 “Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the work-place.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 26–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet & Meredith Marra
2002 “Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 1683–1710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922 Language: Its nature, development and origins. London. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2000 “Gender and joking: on the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 55–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Responding to irony in different contexts: on cognition in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1387–1411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Gender and humor: The state of the art.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 38. 4–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 “The social stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores.” In Coupland & Jaworski (eds.) 1997 Sociolinguistics : A reader and Coursebook. New York. Martin’s Press. 168–178.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1975 Language and Woman’s place. New York : Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mills, Sarah
2005 “Gender and impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 263–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal
2003 “Issues in conversational joking.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1333–1359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor
2012 La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & Xose Padilla
(eds.) 2009 Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & M. Belén Alvarado Ortega
(eds.) 2013: Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santaemilia, José
2002 “Towards a pragmatics of gendered conversation: a few general considerations.” In Quaderns de Filología, vol. VII, pp. 93–113.Google Scholar
Suderland, Jane & Lia Litosseliti
(eds.) 2002: Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdan. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2005 “(Im)Politeness, face an perceptions of rapport: un packaging their bases an interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 95–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1972 The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
2002 Para entender la pragmática. Madrid, Gredos.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor & Esther Linares-Bernabéu
2020. Subversive humor in Spanish stand-up comedy . HUMOR 33:1 ► pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa & Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
2021. Marcas e indicadores humorísticos en las narraciones escritas de niños y niñas de 8, 10 y 12 años en español. Spanish in Context 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.