Cover not available
Part of
Text and Wine: Approaches from terminology and translation
Edited by M. del Carmen Balbuena Torezano and Manuela Álvarez Jurado
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 38] 2023
► pp. 161–182

Sipping or glugging

Unconventional wine tasting descriptors

ORCID logo | University of Cádiz
ORCID logo | University of Cádiz
Wine culture has increasingly become part of our lives. The knowledge of the specific wine tasting terms is a major concern especially for non-professionals and for non-expert consumers. One of the main characteristics of this terminology is that it is constantly evolving and as a result it affects wine descriptors. Our objective is to describe the main characteristics of the processes and reasons for creating non-conventional wine tasting terms from two different approaches, semantic and rhetorical. Communicating our personal, subjective and pleasing experience and emotions, and expressing them by means of familiar, ordinary and everyday life words, which are considered to be unconventional in this field, is a recurrent procedure as opposed to the use of conventional terms.
Keywords: wine tasting descriptor, morphology, semantics, rhetoric, Spanish wine, realia, cultural reference, wine tourism, wine lexicon
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Wine terminology
    • 2.1Wine tasting terminology
  • 3.Creation and use of non-conventional wine tasting terms
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Semantic approach
  • 6.Rhetorical approach
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.38.12gal
References (32)
References
Cabré Castellví, M. T. (2003). Theories of Terminology. Their Description, Prescription and Explanation. Terminology 9:2, 163–199.Google Scholar
Darmesteter, A. (1979). La vie des mots. Paris: Éditions Champ Libre.Google Scholar
Domecq y Williams, B. (2013). Sherry Uncovered: Tasting and Enjoyment; with Bodega Glossary. Jerez de la Frontera. Ediciones Presea.Google Scholar
Fainsilber, L. & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical Uses of Language in the Expression of Emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2:4, 239–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furrow, D. (2016). American Foodie. Taste, Art, and the Cultural Revolution. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Soler, Mª J. (2003). Un uso metafórico del vino en Aristófanes: las vinosas treguas de Acarnienses, 186–200. Veleia, 20, 383–390.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd Edition. London: Edward Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jasinki, J. (2001). Rhetoric: Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies. London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katamba, F. (2005). English Words. Structure, History, Usage, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, C. (1980). Novel and Conventional Metaphors: A Matter of Methodology. Poetics Today, 2(1b), 13–24. <[URL]> [Accessed March 2020]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A. (2007). Can Wines be Brawny? In B. Smith (Ed.), Questions of Taste: the Philosophy of Wine (pp. 127–140). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (2009). Introducing Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loureiro, V., Brasil, R. & Malfeito-Ferreira, M. (2016). A New Wine Tasting Approach Based on Emotional Responses to Rapidly Recognize Classic European Wine Styles. Beverages 2, 6, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noya Gallardo, C. (1995). Los Cambios Semánticos: Orígenes y Consecuencias. Pragmalingüística, 2, 373–86.Google Scholar
(2018). Wine Blog Texts: Syntactic Relationships between Clauses from the Systemic Functional Perspective. En M. M. Rivas Carmona y A. Veroz González (Eds.), Agroalimentación: Lenguajes de Especialidad y Traducción (pp. 89–110). Granada: Comares. Interlingua.Google Scholar
Ortony, A. & Fainsilber, L. (2002). The Role of Metaphors in Descriptions of Emotions. <[URL]> [Accessed March 2020]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirtskhalaishvili, T. (2018). Multimodal Metaphors in Wine Advertisements. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science. 6(10), 29–34.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1949). Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Braca & World. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scruton, R. (2007). The Philosophy of Wine. In B. Smith (Ed.), Questions of Taste: the Philosophy of Wine (pp. 18–38). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaeda, I. (2017). Of Synaesthetic Wine Metaphors, Discourse Communities, Addressers and Addressees: The Specialised Language of Wine Descriptors. ASp [Online], 72 <[URL]> [Accessed March 2020]Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (2012). The Tastes of Wine: Towards a Cultural History. Rivista di estetica, (51), 49–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. C. (Ed.) (2007). Questions of Taste, The Philosophy of Wine. Oxford: Signal Books Limited.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1983). Semantics. An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Urquidi, A. (2015). Meaning Construction in Creative Metaphors: Conventional Meaning Integration through Generic Interfacing in a Blend, and Conditions of Propagation and Lexicalization. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 14, 219–237. Retrieved from <[URL]> [Accessed March 2020]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Electronic references
Atkin, T. (2007–2020). Tasting Notes. [URL]Google Scholar
Boehling, C. (2020, October 21,). The Glories of Sweetness [URL]Google Scholar
Dunne, M. (2020). San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition. [URL]Google Scholar
Goode, J. (2018–2021). WineAnorak, Global Wine Journal. Jamie Goode’s Wine blog. [URL]Google Scholar
Luyten, R. (2018–2021). Sherry Notes. 2018-2021: 2020 [URL]Google Scholar
Suckling, J. (2018–2021). JSWine Ratings. 2018-2021: 2020 [URL]Google Scholar
Vino, I. (2012, August 15). Wine Talks. El vino como pretexto para hablar de todo [URL]Google Scholar
Wine Spectator Magazine. (n.d.). Top 100 lists. [URL]