Cover not available
Part of
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 131–152

Lexical agreement processes

On the construction of verbal aspect

This paper examines the construction of verbal aspect as a sub-case of generation of verbal lexical meaning. The analysis is based on Pustejovsky’s (1995) Generative Lexicon and assumes the existence of a set of lexical agreement processes that match the lexical features of arguments (and adjuncts) with the information contained in the meta-entry of the verb in the mental lexicon. Verbal meta-entries include distinct sub-structures, among them the Event Structure, which is composed of different phases or sub-events. The materialization of some subevents or others depends on the agreement processes triggered by the arguments and adjuncts and gives rise to different aspectual meanings for the same verb.
Keywords: aspectual meaning, lexical agreement processes, lexical features, verbal aspect
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.07dem
References (22)
Asher, Nicholas and Pustejovsky, James. 2006. “A Type Composition Logic for Generative Lexicon.” Journal of Cognitive Science 7 (1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Batiukova, Olga. 2008. Del léxico a la sintaxis: aspecto y qualia en la gramática del ruso y del español. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Batiukova, Olga, Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Lenci, Alessandro and Zarcone, Alessandra. 2015. “Identifying actional features through semantic priming: cross-Romance comparison.” In Cahiers Chronos 27, monographic edition, Emmanuelle Labeau and Qiaochao Zhang (eds.), 161–187. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bott, Oliver. 2010. The processing of events. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “El aspecto léxico.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), vol.2, 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Qué significan aspectualmente algunos verbos y qué pueden llegar a significar.” In Estudios de Lingüística: el verbo. ELUA 2004, monographic edition, José Luis Cifuentes and Carmen Marimón (eds.), 167–206. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante. [URL].Google Scholar
. 2009. “La Teoría del Lexicón Generativo.” In Panorama de la lexicología, Elena de Miguel (ed.), 337–368. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. 2011. “En qué consiste ser verbo de apoyo.” In 60 Problemas de Gramática (dedicados a Ignacio Bosque), MªVictoria Escandell, Manuel Leonetti and Cristina Sánchez (eds.), 139–146. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Properties an internal structure of the Lexicon. Applying the Generative Lexicon Model to Spanish.” In Advances in the Sciences of Language and their Application to Second Language Teaching, Montserrat Sanz and José Manuel Igoa (eds.), 165–200. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2013. “La polisemia de los verbos soporte. Propuesta de definición mínima.” In Los verbos en el diccionario, Anexos Revista de Lexicografía 20, Sergi Torner and Elisenda Bernal (eds.), 67–109. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Minimal Definitions and Lexical Agreement: Project of a Dynamic Dictionary.” In Planning non-existent dictionaries, Joᾶo Paulo Silvestre and Alina Villalva (eds.), 69–85. Lisboa/Aveiro: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa and Universidade de Aveiro.Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena and Batiukova, Olga. 2014. “Compositional mechanisms in a generative model of the lexicon.” In Collocations and other lexical combinations in Spanish. Theoretical and Applied approaches, Sergi Torner and Elisenda Bernal (eds.). Ohio: Ohio State University Press (in press).Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena and Fernández Lagunilla, Marina. 2000. “El operador aspectual se.” Revista Española de Lingüística 30 (1): 13–43.Google Scholar
. 2007. “La naturaleza léxica del aspecto composicional.” In Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General, Pablo Cano, et al. (eds), vol. IIA, 1767–1778. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina and De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “Relaciones entre el léxico y la sintaxis: adverbios de foco y delimitadores aspectuales.” Verba 26: 97–128.Google Scholar
Moens, Marc and Steedman, Mark. 1988. “Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference.” Computational Linguistics 14 (2): 15–28.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Julius M. 1975. “Aitia as generative factor in Aristotle’s philosophy.” Dialogue (Canadian Philosophical Review) 14 (4): 622–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. “What Makes Reality Intelligible? Reflections on Aristotle’s Theory of Aitia.” In Aristotle’s Physics, Lindsay Judson (ed.), 31–47. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James and Rumshisky, Anna. 2010. “Mechanisms of Sense Extensons in Verbs.” In A Way with Words: A Festschrift for Patrick Hanks, De Schryver, Gilles-Maurice (ed.), chapter 4. Kampala: Menha Publishers.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Miguel Aparicio, Elena de
2022. Los adjuntos en la construcción del significado verbal. Linguistica 62:1-2 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.