Romance object-experiencer verbs
From aktionsart to activity hierarchy
The present paper deals with Romance Objective-Experiencer verbs (OE-verbs). I will show that the different subclasses fit into a continuum between a causative and an unaccusative pole. In order to describe their varying syntactic behaviour, a finer-grained analysis of the subevents they denote will elucidate that a traditional approach following the Vendler-Dowty classes of aktionsart will reach its limit when it comes to OE-verbs. My claim is that case assignment to the experiencer does not straightforwardly follow from the aktionsart class, but from the activity contrast between the two arguments of the verb. The presence or absence of causativity explains the differentiation between two types of experiencer: (a) a more passive causatively affected experiencer and (b) a less passive experiencer undergoing a change of state in a particular situation without being affected by an external causer. In addition, we find a third type of OE-verb: prototypically unaccustative (ergative) verbs, such as verbs of liking, which select a more active experiencer expressing a subjective judgement. These three types constitute prototypical categories with fuzzy edges. Romance languages differ in the way they code the three types at the lexical level and at the level of the constructional inventory. The results can be formalized following the activity hierarchy approach (Kailuweit 2013).
References (44)
Arad, Maya. 1998. “Psych-Notes.” UCL Working papers in linguistics 10: 203–222.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Andrea and Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. “Psych Verbs and Theta Theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bialy, Adam. 2005. Polish Psychological Verbs at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Cross Linguistic Perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blum, Laurence A. 1980. Friendship, Altruism, and Morality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cançado, Márcia. 1995. “A teoria da proeminência de Grimshaw e os psico-verbos do portugûes brasileiro.” D.E.L.T.A. 11/2: 279–299.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Gregory N. 1978. Reference to kinds in English. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Desidero, Linda. 1993. “Psych Verbs and the Nature of Complex Events.” Northwestern Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 11–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dortrecht: Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David. 1991. “Non-Verbal Thematic Proto-Roles.” Language 67 (3): 547–619. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ekman, Paul. 1994. “All Emotions Are Basic.” In Ekman, Paul & Davidson, Richard J. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 15–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filip, Hana. 2012. “Lexical Aspect.” In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, R.I. Binnick (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Robert D. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA / London: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Härtl, Holden. 2001. Cause und Change: thematische Relationen und Ereignisstrukturen in Konzeptualisierung und Grammatikalisierung. Berlin: Akademieverlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kailuweit, Rolf. 2005. Linking: Syntax und Semantik französischer und italienischer Gefühlsverben. Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kailuweit, Rolf. 2007. “El enlace de los verbos de sentimiento – un cálculo de rasgos.” In Cano López, Pablo (Ed.), Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General, Santiago de Compostela, 3–7 de mayo de 2004, Vol. 2, Tomo 1, 2007 (Las lenguas y su estructura (IIa)), 1699–1708.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1989. “An investigation of the lumps of thought.” In Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5): 607–653. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2002. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Ms. Ben Gurion University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2010. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín, Rafael. 2011. “Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos.” In Sobre estados y estatividad, A. Carrasco (ed.), 26–44. München: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Fabienne. 2002. “La préposition de du complément d’agent des verbes psychologiques causatifs : un génitif.” Scolia 15: 57–70.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martín, Juan. 1998. “The Lexico-Semantic Interface: Psych Verbs and Psych Nouns.” Hispania 81: 619–631. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathieu, Yannik Y. 2000. Les verbes de sentiment. De l’analyse linguistique au traitement automatique. Paris: CNRS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nissenbaum, Helen F. 1985. Emotion and Focus. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambrigde, MA/London: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000. “On Stativity and Causation.” In Events as Grammatical Objects. The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, C. Tenny and J. Pustojovsky (eds.), 417–444. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2001. Experiencing Derivations. [[URL]].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. “The Theta system – Overview.” Theoretical Linguistics 28 (3): 229–290.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, Bożena. 1988. “Thematic Restrictions on Derived Nominals.” In Syntax and Semantics 21. Thematic Relations, W. Wilkins (ed.), 147–165. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. “A propos d’une classe de verbes ‘psychologiques’.” In Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, N. Ruwet (ed.), 181–251. Paris: Seuil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1994. “Être ou ne pas être un verbe de sentiment.” Langue Française 103: 45–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1995. “Les verbes de sentiment peuvent-ils être agentifs?” Langue Française 105: 28–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D. and LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Voorst, Jan. 1992. “The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 65–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Voorst, Jan. 1995. “Le contrôle de l’espace psychologique.” Langue Française 105: 17–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vanhoe, Henk. 2002. Aspectos de la sintaxis de los verbos psicológicos en español. Un análisis léxico funcional. Dissertation. Universiteit Gent.
Verkuyl, H.J. 1989. “Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Composition.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 39–94. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vermandere, Dieter. 2002. I verbi psicologici italiani. Uno studio semantico e sintattico. Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wanner, Anja. 2001. “The Optimal Linking of Arguments: The Case of English Psychological Verbs.” In Competition in Syntax, Müller Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), 377–399. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whitley, Stanley M. 1995. “Gustar and Other Psych Verbs. A Problem in Transitivity.” Hispania 78: 573–585. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Cançado, Márcia, Luana Amaral, Letícia Meirelles & Maria José Foltran
2024.
Psych verbs: the behavior of ObjExp verbs in Brazilian Portuguese.
Linguistics 62:1
► pp. 121 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.