Argumentation and Health
Special Issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:1 (2012)
Editors
| University of Lucerne & Swiss Paraplegic Research
| University of Amsterdam
[Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1:1] 2012. vi, 142 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Argumentation in the healthcare domainSara Rubinelli and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans | pp. 1–4
-
Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor–patient relationshipJerome Bickenbach | pp. 5–18
-
Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-makingA. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans and Dima Mohammed | pp. 19–32
-
Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditionsRoosmaryn Pilgram | pp. 33–50
-
Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultationsSarah Bigi | pp. 51–65
-
Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and whatSara Rubinelli and Claudia Zanini | pp. 66–80
-
Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity typeRenske Wierda and Jacky Visser | pp. 81–96
-
The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochuresLotte van Poppel | pp. 97–112
-
Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systemsNancy L. Green | pp. 113–129
-
“It is about our body, our own body!” On the difficulty of telling dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for themPeter J. Schulz and Bert Meuffels | pp. 130–142
Articles
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Sara Rubinelli
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.