This article is concerned with the reasons why sometimes good arguments in health communication leaflets fail to convince the targeted audience. As an illustrative example it uses the age-dependent eligibility of women in the Netherlands to receive routine breast cancer screening examinations: according to Dutch regulations women under 50 are ineligible for them. The present qualitative study rests on and complements three experimental studies on the persuasiveness of mammography information leaflets; it uses interviews to elucidate reasons why the arguments in the health communication leaflets for the exclusion of women under 50 from routine mammographic screenings do not work.
Labrie, Nanon H. M., Ramona Ludolph & Peter J. Schulz
2017. Investigating young women’s motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 17:1
Labrie, Nanon H.M.
2015. The Promise and Prospects of Argumentation for Public Health Communication. Journal of Public Health Research 4:1 ► pp. jphr.2015.547 ff.
2013. Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 550 ff.
Schulz, Peter & Bert Meuffels
2015. Differential appraisal of age thresholds for mammographic screening in Holland and Switzerland. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.