A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication
The case of disputes over a proposed chemical project in mainland China
To explore an argumentative approach to governmental crisis communication, this research adopts the pragma-dialectical framework to analyze and evaluate a local Chinese government’s crisis discourse concerning disputes over a proposed chemical project. The discourse is collected from the popular local online forum Mengxi Forum. By reconstructing from the discourse the four stages of a critical discussion, analyzing the embedded strategic maneuverings and evaluating the argumentation in view of institutional preconditions, it is shown that in its use of co-ordinative argumentation structures and causal argument schemes, the local government’s crisis discourse is not dialectically reasonable enough to convince the other stakeholders of the necessity to implement the proposed project. The results also shed some light on the necessity for governments’ crisis information management to ensure in its crisis discourse both dialectical reasonableness and rhetorical effectiveness.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Institutional preconditions for governmental crisis communication in mainland China
- 3.A case study on disputes over a proposed chemical project in mainland China
- 3.1Argumentative reconstruction of the official statement
- 3.2Strategic maneuvering in the official statement
- 3.3Evaluation
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (38)
References
Benoit, W. L. 1997. Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review 231: 177–186.
Chen, N. 2009. Institutionalizing public relations: A case study of Chinese government crisis communication on the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Public Relations Review 351: 187–198.
Coombs, W. T. 2007a. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coombs, W. T. 2007b. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review 101: 163–176.
Coombs, W. T. 2009a. Conceptualizing crisis communication. In R. L. Heath and H. D. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of crisis and risk communication (pp. 100–119). New York: Routledge.
van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Eemeren, F. H.. 2016. Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation 301: 1–23.
Fediuk, T. A., K. M. Pace, and I. C. Botero. 2010. Crisis response effectiveness: Methodological considerations for advancement in empirical investigation into response impact. In W. T. Coombs and S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 221–242). Wiley-Blackwell.
Graham, M. W., E. J. Avery, and S. Park. 2015. The role of social media in local government crisis communications. Public Relations Review 411: 386–394.
Hovland, C. 2015. The order of presentation in persuasion (reprinted). Beijing: Communication University of China Press.
Hu, F. 2003. How to tell the truth: The government information release in the management of an emergent public security crisis – the second pragmatic analysis of the crisis management. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 35(6): 84–89.
Huang, W., L. Xin, and M. Zeng. 2012. Public crisis information management model oriented to government’s crisis decision-making. Library and Information Service 56(17): 26–30.
Kim, S., E. J. Avery, and R. W. Lariscy. 2009. Are crisis communicators practicing what we preach?: An evaluation of crisis response strategy analyzed in public relations research from 1991 to 2009. Public Relations Review 351: 446–448.
Lee, K. 2009. How the Hong Kong government lost the public trust in SARS: Insights for government communication in a health crisis. Public Relations Review 351: 74–76.
Lee, S. Y. 2016. Weathering the crisis: Effects of stealing thunder in crisis communication. Public Relations Review 421: 336–344.
Liang, Z. 2014. Governments’ crisis communication through official micro-blogs and its discourse construction. Press Circles 111: 45–53.
Liu, B. F. 2007. President Bush’s major post-Katrina speeches: Enhancing image repair discourse theory applied to the public sector. Public Relations Review 331: 40–48.
Liu, B. F., and J. D. Fraustino. 2014. Beyond image repair: Suggestions for crisis communication theory development. Public Relations Review 401: 543–546.
Lu, C. 2014. Governance system of governmental crisis communication. China Publishing Journal 201: 10–14.
van der Meer, T. G. 2014. Organizational crisis-denial strategy: The effect of denial on public framing. Public Relations Review 401: 537–539.
Nie, J., Y. Lou, and B. Wang. 2013. On crisis context and governments’ discursive strategies – based on two case studies. Social Science Research 11: 196–201.
Olsson, E. 2014. Crisis communication in public organizations: Dimensions of crisis communication revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 221: 113–125.
Park, H. 2016. Exploring effective crisis response strategies. Public Relations Review. In Press.
Qian, J., and A. Shi. 2012. Governmental crisis communication in the Chinese context – The case of Wukan crisis. Journalism Bimonthly 41: 92–97.
Roshan, M., M. Warren, and R. Carr. 2016. Understanding the use of social media by organizations for crisis communication. Computers in Human Behavior 631: 350–361.
Sha, Y., and H. Liu. 2009. Stakeholders analysis model of public crisis. Science﹒Economy﹒Society 11: 58–61.
Shi, A. 2008. Rethinking and localizing the western paradigm of crisis communication research in the Chinese context. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 61: 22–27.
Shi, B., and H. Jin. 2012. Simulation of government response to public crisis network information diffusion. Library and Information Service 56(19): 114–121.
Shi, B., and X. Ji. 2014. Netizen’s retransmission of public crisis information with social media. Journal of Intelligence 331: 145–149.
Song, Y. 1998. Western classical rhetoric and its charm of rhetorical argumentation. Foreign Language Research 31: 33–37.
Wang, Y., and C. Chen. 2016. Governments’ crisis management and image construction in the era of social media: A case study of the Tianjin 812 explosion accident. Journalism and Communication 71: 47–59.
Wu, G. 2014. Study on crisis communication. In J. Hong (Eds.), New trends of communication sciences (pp. 225–226). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Wu, J. 2012. Public crisis information diffusion control for the construction of Chinese government image. China Publishing Journal 41: 65–68.
Xie, Q., and J. Chu. 2016. Research based on social media-based public participation in government crisis communication – Comparative case studies between China and USA. China Soft Science 31: 130–140.
Zhao, Z. 2009. Introduction to crisis communication. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Zhou, R., and J. Qi. 2014. Government communication information risk modeling in unexpected public emergency – based on the analysis of microblog. Information Science 32(8): 68–74.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Banyongen, Serge
2020.
Assessing Crisis Communication Teamwork Performance during a Terrorist Attack: A Pragma-Dialectic Analysis.
Canadian Journal of Communication 45:3
► pp. 437 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.