Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 7:3 (2018) ► pp. 285315
Aakhus, Mark
2001Designing web-based interactional tools to support learning from experience. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling, M. Schoop and J. Taylor Eds: 51–67.Google Scholar
2003Neither naive nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation 17(3): 265–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Communication as design. Communication monographs 74(1): 112–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berti, Emanuele
2007Scholasticorum studia. Seneca il Vecchio e la cultura retorica e letteraria della prima età imperiale. Pisa: Giardini Editori e Stampatori.Google Scholar
Brenninkmeijer, Alex F. M., Karen van Oyen, Hugo Prein, and Paul Walters
2005Handboek mediation. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Burr, Anne M.
2002Confidentiality in mediation communications: A privilege worth protecting. Dispute Resolution Journal 57(1): 64–70.Google Scholar
Burrell, Nancy A., and Sally M. Vogl
1990Turf-side conflict mediation for students. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 7(3): 237–250.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2007Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Colatrella Jr., Michael T.
2000Court-performed mediation in the People’s Republic of China: A proposed model to improve the United States federal district courts’ mediation programs. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 151: 391–424.Google Scholar
Currie, Cris
2004Mediating off the Grid. Dispute Resolution Journal 59(2): 8–15.Google Scholar
Deason, Ellen E.
2001The Quest for Uniformity in Mediation Confidentiality: Foolish Consistency or Crucial Predictability. Marquette Law Review 851:79–111.Google Scholar
Deng, Yiheng
2012Strategy to alleviate adversity in Chinese mediation: a discourse analysis on real Chinese mediation sessions. Chinese Journal of Communication 5(4): 417–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence R., and Michael L. Prigoff
1986Confidentiality in Mediation: The Need for Protection. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 21: 37–46.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger, William L. Ury, and Bruce Patton
1991Getting to Yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Debanjan, Smaranda Muresan, Nina Wacholder, Mark Aakhus, and Matthew Mitsui
2014Analyzing argumentative discourse units in online interactions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining: 39–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glasl, Friedrich
2004Selbsthilfe in Konflikten. Konzepte- Übungen – Praktische Methoden. Stuttgart/Bern: Freies Geistesleben.Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara
2008The ontology of conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition 16 (3): 540–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Argumentation in dispute mediation: A reasonable way to handle conflict (Vol. 31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Argomentare per superare il conflitto: L’argomentazione nella mediazione. Sistemi Intelligenti 24 (3): 481–502.Google Scholar
Greco, Sara
2018Designing dialogue: Argumentation as conflict management in social interaction. Tranel – Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique 681: 7–15. Available open-access at http://​www​.unine​.ch​/files​/live​/sites​/tranel​/files​/tranel​/68​/7​-15​_Greco​.pdf
Haynes, John M.
1994The fundamentals of family mediation. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, John M., and Gretchen L. Haynes
1989Mediating divorce. Casebook of strategies for successful family negotiation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Herman, Margaret S.
2006Handbook of Mediation: Bridging Theory, Research, and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs
1980Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 661: 251–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
2002Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10): 1402–1426.Google Scholar
Janier, Mathilde, and Chris Reed
2017Towards a theory of close analysis for dispute mediation discourse. Argumentation 31(1): 45–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Nam H., James Wall Jr, Dong-Won Sohn, and Jay Kim
1993Community and industrial mediation in South Korea. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(2): 361–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Isaak
2003Mediation and conciliation in Switzerland. In Global Trends in Mediation, ed. by Nadja Alexander: 341–357. Köln: Centrale für Mediation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montefusco, Lucia
1987La funzione della “partitio” nel discorso oratorio. In Studi di retorica oggi in Italia, ed. by A. Pennacini, 69–85. Bologna: Pitagora. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plantin, Christian
1996Le trilogue argumentatif. Présentation de modèle, analyse de cas. Langue Française 112: 9–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porter, James E.
1990Divisio as em-/de-powering topic: A basis for argument in rhetoric and composition. Rhetoric Review 8(2): 191–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Linda L., and Michael E. Holmer
1992Communication perspectives on negotiation. In Communication and Negotiation, ed. by Linda L. Putnam, and Michael E. Roloff, 128–155. Newbury Park: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
2018Building mutual affection-based face in conflict mediation: A Chinese relationship management model. Journal of Pragmatics 1291: 185–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence
2010Looking at negotiation and dispute resolution through a CA/DA lens. Negotiation Journal 26 (2): 163–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabucanon, Gill M. P., James Wall Jr, and Wan Yan
2008Philippine Community Mediation, Katarungang Pambarangay. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2(5): 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traverso, Véronique
1999L’analyse des conversations. Paris: Nathan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H.
(Ed.) 2001Crucial concepts in argumentation theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) 2009Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (Vol. 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation (Vol. 21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion (Vol. 11). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs
1993Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Grootendorst, R.
2004A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach (Vol. 141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
2009How should one respond to fallacious moves? Argumentation and Advocacy 45(4): 198–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rees, M. Agnes
1992The use of language in conversation. An introduction to research in conversational analysis. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017Strategic manoeuvring in dispute mediation. Argumentation & Advocacy 53 (3): 234–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wall, James A., Nimet Beriker, and Sharon Wu
2010Turkish community mediation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 401: 2019–2042. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wall, James A., and Timothy Dunne
2012Mediation research: A current review. Negotiation Journal 281: 217–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bijnen, Emma van
2019. Dialogical power negotiations in conflict mediation. Language and Dialogue 9:1  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.