The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch
parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents
of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing
reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.
2002Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 153–167). Amsterdam/Newport News, VA: Sic Sat & Vale Press.
Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2016Splitting a difference of opinion. In Patrick Bondy & Laura Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21 2016 Windsor, ON: OSSA. (pp. 1–19). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018aSplitting a difference of opinion: The shift to negotiation. Argumentation, 32(3), 329–350. Reworked part of van Laar & Krabbe 2016.
Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018bThe role of argument in negotiation. Argumentation, 321, 549–567.
2018. The Role of Argument in Negotiation. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.