The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch
parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents
of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing
reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.
2002Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 153–167). Amsterdam/Newport News, VA: Sic Sat & Vale Press.
Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2016Splitting a difference of opinion. In Patrick Bondy & Laura Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21 2016 Windsor, ON: OSSA. (pp. 1–19). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018aSplitting a difference of opinion: The shift to negotiation. Argumentation, 32(3), 329–350. Reworked part of van Laar & Krabbe 2016.
Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018bThe role of argument in negotiation. Argumentation, 321, 549–567.
2018. The Role of Argument in Negotiation. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.