In this paper, argumentation practices will be discussed in view of their potential for favoring effective information sharing and
the creation of ‘emergent common ground’, i.e. the common ground that is sought, created and co-constructed in the process of
communication. Argumentation is usually tightly knit with information sharing: if the parties have not previously shared a
sufficient amount of relevant knowledge, it is difficult for them to produce effective argumentation. Based on these premises, in
this paper the argumentation stages of medical encounters will be viewed as opportunities to reveal and integrate insufficient
common ground between clinicians and patients. By relying on the analysis of a corpus of real life encounters in a chronic care
setting, the interaction between information sharing and argumentation will be shown, along with problematic cases of
misunderstandings or ineffective argumentation due to lack of common ground. Implications for the clinical practice will be
discussed.
2013 “What Is Common Ground?” In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, and M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics (pp. 285–310). Cham: Springer.
Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwartz
2009 “Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications from Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog.” Cognitive Science 33 (3):374–400.
Bigi, S.
2014 “Key Components of Effective Collaborative Goal Setting in the Chronic Care Encounter.” Communication and Medicine 11 (2):103–115.
2016b “Communication Skills for Patient Engagement: Argumentation Competencies as Means to Prevent or Limit Reactance Arousal, with an Example from the Italian Healthcare System.” Frontiers in Psychology, 71:1472.
Bigi, S., and G. Lamiani
2016 “The Power of Words: Deliberation Dialogue as a Model to Favor Patient Engagement in Chronic Care.” In G. Graffigna (Ed.), Promoting Patient Engagement and Participation for Effective Healthcare Reform (pp. 66–92). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Brown, J. B., Stewart, M., McCracken, E., McWhinney, I. R., and J. Levenstein
1986 “The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 2. Definition and Application.” Family Practice 3 (2):75–79.
Epstein, R. M., and R. L. J. Street
2011 “The Values and Value of Patient-Centered Care.” Annals of Family Medicine 9 (2):100–103.
Heritage, J.
2010 “Questioning in Medicine.” In A. F. Freed and S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”. The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse (pp. 42–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ishikawa, H., Hashimoto, H., and T. Kiuchi
2013 “The Evolving Concept of “Patient-Centeredness” In Patient-Physician Communication Research.” Social Science and Medicine (1982) 961:147–153.
Kecskes, I.
2008 “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (3):385–406.
2013 “On the Dynamic Relations Between Common Ground and Presupposition.” In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, and M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics (pp. 375–396). Cham: Springer.
Kurtz, S., Silverman, J., Benson, J., and J. Draper
2003 “Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides.” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 78 (8):802–809.
Labrie, N.
2012 “Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point.” Argumentation 26 (2):171–199.
2015 “The Promise and Prospects of Argumentation for Public Health Communication.” Journal of public health research 4 (1):547–549.
Labrie, N., and P. Schulz
2014 “The Effects of General Practitioners’ Use of Argumentation to Support Their Treatment Advice: Results of an Experimental Study Using Video-Vignettes.” Health communication 30 (10):951–961.
Labrie, N., and P. Schulz
2015 “Exploring the Relationships Between Participatory Decision-Making, Visit Duration, and General Practitioners’ Provision of Argumentation to Support their Medical Advice: Results from a Content Analysis.” Patient education and counseling 98 (5):572–577.
Labrie, N., Schulz, P., and S. Zurbriggen
2015 “The Effects of Reasoned Shared Decision-Making on Consultation Outcomes: Results of a Randomized-Controlled Experiment Among a Student Population.” Studies in Communication Sciences 15 (2):182–189.
Lamiani, G., Bigi, S., Mancuso, M. E., Coppola, A., and E. Vegni
2017 “Applying a Deliberation Model to the Analysis of Consultations in Haemophilia: Implications for Doctor-Patient Communication.” Patient Education and Counseling 100 (4):690–695.
Lamiani, G., Strada, I., Mancuso, M. E., Coppola, A., Vegni, E., and E. A. Moja
; the Pro-Adherence Study Group 2015 “Factors Influencing Illness Representations and Perceived Adherence in Haemophilic Patients: A Pilot Study.” Haemophilia 21 (5):598–604.
Levenstein, J., McCracken, E., McWhinney, I. R., Stewart, M., and J. B. Brown
1986 “The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 1. A Model for the Doctor-Patient Interaction in Family Medicine.” Family Practice 3 (1):24–30.
Levinson, S. C.
1992 “Activity Types and Language.” In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macagno, F.
forthcoming. “Practical Reasoning and the Act of Naming Reality.” Revue internationale de philosophie.
Mead, N., and P. Bower
2000 “Patient-Centredness: a Conceptual Framework and Review of the Empirical Literature.” Social Science and Medicine (1982) 51 (7):1087–1110.
Moja, E., and E. Vegni
1998 “La Medicina Centrata sul Paziente.” Annali di Medicina Interna 131:56–64.
Pan, D., Chen, Y., and S. Ju
2018 “Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations.” Argumentation, 37–53.
Pilgram, R.
2009 “Argumentation in Doctor-Patient Interaction: Medical Consultation as a Pragma-Dialectical Communicative Activity Type.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9 (2):153–169.
Rossi, M. G., Leone, D., and S. Bigi
2017 “The Ethical Convenience of Non-Neutrality in Medical Encounters: Argumentative Instruments for Healthcare Providers.” Teoria 37 (2):139–157.
Rubinelli, S.
2013 “Rational versus Unreasonable Persuasion in Doctor–Patient Communication: A Normative Account.” Patient Education and Counseling 92 (3):296–301.
Salmon, P.
2015 “Argumentation and Persuasion in Patient-Centred Communication.” Patient Education and Counseling 981:543–544.
Silverman, J., Kurtz, S., and J. Draper
1998Skills for Communicating with Patients. Oxon: Radcliff Medical Press.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
2016 “Argumentative Patterns in Over-the-Counter Medicine Advertisements.” Argumentation 301:81–95.
Stewart, M., and D. Roter
1989Communicating with Medical Patients. London: Sage Publications.
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Levenstein, J., McCracken, E., and I. R. McWhinney
1986 “The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 3. Changes in Residents’ Performance over Two Months of Training.” Family Practice 3 (3):164–167.
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Weston, W. W., McWhinney, I. R., McWilliam, C. L., and T. L. Freeman
(Eds)1995Patient Centered Medicine; Transforming the Clinical Method. London: Sage Publications.
van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser
2005 “Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.” OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 9.
van Poppel, L.
2014 “The Strategic Function of Variants of Pragmatic Argumentation in Health Brochures.” In S. Rubinelli and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Argumentation and health (pp. 97–112). (Benjamins current topics; No. 64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Veldhuijzen, W.
2011Challenging the Patient Centred Paradigm: Designing Feasible Guidelines for Doctor-Patient Communication. Doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University.
Akkermans, Aranka, Sanne Prins, Amber S. Spijkers, Jean Wagemans, Nanon H. M. Labrie, Dick L. Willems, Marcus J. Schultz, Thomas G. V. Cherpanath, Job B. M. van Woensel, Marc van Heerde, Anton H. van Kaam, Moniek van de Loo, Anne Stiggelbout, Ellen M. A. Smets & Mirjam A. de Vos
2023. Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study. Intensive Care Medicine 49:4 ► pp. 421 ff.
Akkermans, Aranka, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Nanon Labrie, Inge Henselmans & Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.