Article published in:
Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
Edited by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2] 2018
► pp. 181203


Charles, Cathy, Amiram Gafni, and Tim Whelan
1997 “Shared Decision-Making in the Medical Encounter: What Does it Mean (or It Takes At Least Two to Tango).” Social Science and Medicine 44 (5): 681–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van
2016 “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 30 (1): 1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans
2005Argumentatieve indicatoren in het Nederlands. Een pragma-dialectische studie. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans
2011Argumentatie. Inleiding in het identificeren van meningsverschillen en het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. Groningen/Houten: Noordhoff Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geest, Ingeborg M. van der
2015Argumentatie voor een keuze. Een pragma-dialectische analyse van gemotiveerde keuzes in overheidsbesluiten over m.e.r.-plichtige projecten. Ablasserdam: HavekaGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K.
2007Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henselmans, Inge, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Jane van der Vloodt, Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes, and Ellen M. A. Smets
2017 “Shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy: A qualitative observation of talk about patients’ preferences.” Palliative Medicine 31 (7): 625–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Edward J.
1994 ““in the Balance”: Weighing the Evidence.” Annals of Internal Medicine 120 (10): 889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 202 ]
Labrie, Nanon H. M., and Peter J. Schulz
2015 “Quantifying Doctors’ Argumentation in General Practice Consultation Through Content Analysis: Measurement Development and Preliminary Results.” Argumentation 29: 33–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication.” Health Communication 29 (10): 996–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neuendorf, Kimberly A.
2002The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Pilgram, Roosmaryn
2015A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint.Google Scholar
2009 “Argumentation in doctor-patient interaction: Medical consultation as a pragmadialectical communicative activity type.” Studies in Communication Sciences 92: 153–169.Google Scholar
Prigerson, Holly G., Yuhua Bao, Manish A. Shah, M. Elizabeth Paulk, Thomas W. LeBlanc, Bryan J. Schneider, Melissa M. Garrido, M. Carrington Reid, David A. Berlin, Kerin B. Adelson, Alfred I. Neugut, and Paul K. Maciejewski
2015Chemotherapy use, performance status, and quality of life at the end of life. JAMA Oncology 1: 778–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schellens, Peter J., and Gerard Verhoeven
1988Argument en tegenargument. Een inleading in de analyse en beoordeling van betogende teksten. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A.
2017 “Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (1): 59–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A., and Dima Mohammed
2012 “Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1): 19–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A., and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2012 “The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: Institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making.” In Between scientists & citizens: proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, ed. by Jean Goodwin, 345–354. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.Google Scholar
Wierda, Renske M.
2015Experience-based authority argumentation in direct-to-consumer medical advertisements: An analytical and empirical study concerning the strategic anticipation of critical questions. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint.[ p. 203 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Akkermans, Aranka, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Nanon Labrie, Inge Henselmans & Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
2019.  In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Kunneman, Marleen, Fania R. Gärtner, Ian G. Hargraves & Victor M. Montori
2018. Commentary on “The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2  pp. 204 ff. Crossref logo
Labrie, Nanon
2019. “Doctor, I disagree”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3  pp. 336 ff. Crossref logo
Wackers, Dunja Y.M., H. José Plug & Gerard J. Steen
2021. “For crying out loud, don't call me a warrior”: Standpoints of resistance against violence metaphors for cancer. Journal of Pragmatics 174  pp. 68 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.