Book review
Francesco Arcidiacono & Antonio Bova (2017). Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional
contexts
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Review of the chapters
- 3.Conclusion
-
References
References
Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B.
2009 Argumentative design.
N. M. Mirza &
A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.),
Argumentation and education (pp. 1451–174). New York: Springer.
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D.
2003 Arguig to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordecht: Kluwer.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
van Eemeren, F. H., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Greco Morasso, S., Grossen, M., & Rigotti, E.
2009 Argupolis, a doctoral program on argumentation practices in different communication contexts.
Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 289–301.
Golder, C.
1996 Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne et Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.
Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
2015 L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et psychosociales. In
N. Muller Mirza &
C. Buty (Eds.),
L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 39–82). Bern: Peter Lang.
Kuhn, D.
1991 The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W.
2003 The development of argument skills.
Child Development, 74(5), 1245–1260.
Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J.
2014 Does argumentation matter ? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication.
Health Communication, 29(10), 996–1008.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K.
2007 Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge.
Miserez-Caperos, C.
2017 Étude de l’argumentation à visée cognitive dans des interactions entre adulte et enfants : un regard psychosocial sur le modèle pragma-dialectique. Thèse de Doctorat. Retrieved from
[URL]
Perret-Clermont, A. N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S., & Miserez-Caperos, C.
Rigotti, E.
2006 Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage.
Argumentation, 20(4), 519–540.
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
2006 Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication.
Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S.
2010 Comparing the Argumentum-Model of Topics with other contemporary approaches to argument schemes; the procedural and the material components.
Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512.
Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M.
2015 Sur l’adéquation des théories de l’argumentation aux sciences de l’apprentissage et les fondements d’une théorie de “l’argumentissage”. In
N. Muller Mirza &
C. Buty (Eds.),
L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 269–322). Berne: Peter Lang.
Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R.
2001 The origins and nature of arguments: studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negociation.
Discourse processes, 32(2–3), 113–133.
Tartas, V., & Simonneaux, L.
2015 Argumentation et conceptualisation en astromonie en classe de CM2 (grade 5). In
N. Muller Mirza &
C. Buty (Eds.),
L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 135–164). Berne: Peter Lang.