Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 7:3 (2018) ► pp. 249265
References

References

Allen, Mike, and Raymond Preiss
1997 “Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis.” Communication Research Reports 14: 125–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baesler, James, and Judee Burgoon
1994 “The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change.” Communication Research, 21(5): 582–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert
1977 “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological review, 84(2): 191–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeijinga, Anniek, Hans Hoeken, and José Sanders
2016 “Health promotion in the trucking setting: Understanding Dutch truck drivers’ road to health lifestyle changes.” Work, 55(2): 385–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017a “An analysis of health promotion materials for Dutch truck drivers: off target and too difficult?Work, 56: 539–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “The persuasive effects of risk perception-focused versus planning strategies-focused health narratives targeting Dutch truck drivers.” International Journal of Communication, 11: 5007–5026.Google Scholar
Braddock, Kurt and James Dillard
2016 “Meta-analytic Evidence For the Persuasive Effect of Narratives on Beliefs, Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors.” Communication Monographs, 83 (4): 446–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busselle, Rick, and Helena Bilandzic
2009 “Measuring narrative engagement.” Media Psychology, 12 (4): 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, Anneke, Hans Hoeken, José Sanders, and Johannes Beentjes
2009 “The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion.” Communications, 34 (4): 385–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion.” Communication Research, 39 (6): 802–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, John, Enny Das, and Raymond Vet
2008 “What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception.” Health Psychology, 27(1): 110–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dillard, Amanda, Angela Fagerlin, Sonya Dal Cin, Brian Zikmund-Fisher, and Peter Ubel
2010 “Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.” Social Science & Medicine, 71(1): 45–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen
2011Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Green, Melanie, and Timothy Brock
2000 “The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5): 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “In the mind’s eye: Transportation-Imagery Model of narrative persuasion.” In Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations, ed. by Melanie C. Green, Jeffrey J. Strange, and Timothy C. Brock, 315–341. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Greene, Kathryn, Shelly Campo, and Smita C. Banerjee
2010 “Comparing normative, anecdotal, and statistical risk evidence to discourage tanning bed use.” Communication Quarterly 58 (2): 111–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, David, and Jean Wagemans
2011 “The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes.” In Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 185–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, Hans
2001 “Anecdotal, statistical, and causal evidence: Their perceived and actual persuasiveness.” Argumentation 15 (4): 425–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, Hans, and Karin Fikkers
2014 “Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion.” Poetics, 44: 84–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, Hans, and Lettica Hustinx
2007 “The impact of exemplars on responsibility stereotypes in fund-raising letters.” Communication Research, 34(6): 596–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “When is statistical evidence superior to anecdotal evidence? The role of argument type.” Human Communication Research, 35: 491–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, Hans, and Jop Sinkeldam
2014 “The role of identification and emotion and perception of just outcome in evoking emotions in narrative persuasion.” Journal of Communication, 64 (5): 935–955. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, Hans, Ester Šorm, and Peter Jan Schellens
2014 “Arguing about beliefs: Lay people’s criteria to distinguish strong arguments from weak ones.” Thinking & Reasoning, 20 (1): 77–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, Hans, Matthijs Kolthoff, and José Sanders
2016 “Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion.” Human Communication Research, 42 (2): 292–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornikx, Jos
2018 “Combining anecdotal and statistical evidence in real-life discourse: Comprehension and persuasiveness.” Discourse Processes, 55 (3): 324–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornikx, Jos, and Hans Hoeken
2007 “Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence quality.” Communication Monographs 74 (4): 443–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maio, Gregory R., Bas Verplanken, Antony Manstead, Wolfgang Stroebe, Charles Abraham, Paschal Sheeran, and Mark Conner
2007 “Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to policy.” Social Issues and Policy Review, 1 (1): 99–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moyer-Gusé, Emily
2008 “Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages.” Communication Theory, 18 (3): 407–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moyer-Gusé, Emily, Adrienne H. Chung, and Parul Jain
2011 “Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health.” Journal of Communication, 61(3): 387–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Lee Ross
1980Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Oatley, Keith
1999 “Meeting of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification in reading fiction.” Poetics, 28 (5–6): 439–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prati, Gabriele, Luca Pietrantoni, and Bruna Zani
2012 “Influenza vaccination: The persuasiveness of messages among people aged 65 years and older.” Health Communication, 27(5): 413–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schellens, Peter Jan, and Menno De Jong
2004 “Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures.” Argumentation, 18(3): 295–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schellens, Peter Jan, Ester Šorm, Rian Timmers, and Hans Hoeken
2017 “Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific?Argumentation, 31(4):681–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzer, Ralf
2008 “Modeling Health Behavior Change: How to Predict and Modify the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors.” Applied Psychology, 57(1):1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheeran, Paschal
2002 “Intention – behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review.” European review of social psychology, 12(1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Fuyuan, Vivian Sheer and Ruobing Li
2015 “Impact of Narratives on Persuasion in Health Communication: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Advertising, 44 (2): 105–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Michael, and Donna Rouner
2002 “Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion.” Communication Theory, 12 (2): 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
So, Jiyeon, and Robin Nabi
2013 “Reduction of perceived social distance as an explanation for media’s influence on personal risk perceptions: A test of the risk convergence model.” Human Communication Research, 39(3): 317–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael
2001Narrative: a critical linguistic introduction (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Thomas, and Paschal Sheeran
2006 “Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.” Psychological bulletin, 132(2): 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zebregs, Simon, Bas van den Putte, Peter Neijens, and Anneke de Graaf
2015 “The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis.” Health communication, 30(3): 282–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf
1999 “Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts.” Media Psychology, 1(1): 69–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Exemplifcation effects in the promotion of safety and health.” Journal of Communication, 56(1): 221–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf, and Hans-Bernd Brosius
2000Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar