“Easy ways to lose weight with pleasure”
An analysis of the selling arguments in online marketing of commercial diets
Weight-loss efforts have grown more prevalent worldwide. But diets are linked to perception of dissatisfaction, sacrifice and general reduction of pleasure. This paper examines the hypothesis that commercial diets attract consumers by presenting argumentation that appeals to and addresses the difficulties experienced while dieting. The objective of this paper is, therefore, (1) to identify the main promotional strategies in the marketing of commercial diets and (2) to examine if and how the goal of persuasion prevails over the reasonableness of the advice. This research presented a case-study analysis of 12 commercial diets popular in the United Kingdom. An analysis of the argumentation in the online marketing of these diets was conducted. The diets were found to have three distinct features (with or without the endorsement of gurus, with or without the sale of products and the type of weight-loss method used). The analysis revealed that the most prevalent promotional strategies focused on characterizing the diet as being effective, healthy, pleasurable, easy and promoted by a prominent nutritional expert. Additionally, some argumentation structures were observed to contain inconsistent arguments as well as fallacious arguments. Marketers of commercial diets might appeal to easy ways of losing weight that might be suboptimal to adequately inform consumers’ decision-making. A better focus on information for health promotion is needed to balance the benefits of commercial diets in light of a realistic view on how to lose weight.
Keywords: fallacies, health promotion interventions, strategies of argumentation, weight-loss methods
- General characteristics of the diets
- Main argumentation used in marketing diets
- Guru diets
- Inconsistences and some potential fallacies
Published online: 01 February 2019
Crossley, Kara L., Cornelissen, Piers L., and Martin J. Tovée
Dansinger, Michael L., Gleason, Joi A., Griffith, John L., Selker, Harry P., and Ernst J. Schaeffer
Freedman, Marjorie R., King, Janet, and Eileen Kennedy
Jallinoja, Piia, Pajari, Pia, and Pilvikki Absetz
2016 Top Diets Review for 2017. Retrieved from http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/loseweight/Pages/top-10-most-popular-diets-review.aspx
Piernas, Carmen, Aveyand, Paul, and Susan A. Jebb
Putterman, Erin, and Wolfgang Linden
Raghunathan, Rajagopal, Walker Naylor, Rebecca, and Wayne D. Hoyer
Rozin, Paul, Fishler, Claude, Imada, Sumio, Sarubin, Allison, and Amia Wrzesniewski
Rubinelli, Sara, Nakamoto, Kent and Peter J. Schulz
Santos, Inês, Carraça, Eliana V., Marques, Marta M., Sniehotta, Falko F., and Pedro J. Teixeira
2015 “Prevalence and Correlates of Non-Surgical Weight Control Attempts in Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Paper presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Edinburgh, Scotland. June 2015.
Santos, Inês, Sniehotta, Falko F., Marques, Marta M., Carraça, Eliana V., and Pedro J. Teixeira
Schelling, Simone, Munsch, Simone, Meyer, Andrea H., and Jürgen Margraf
Schwartz, Marlene B., and Kathryn E. Henderson
Serdula, Mary K., Mokdad, Ali H., Williamson, David F., Galuska, Deborah A., Mendlein, James M., and Gregory W. Heath
Thomas, Samantha L., Hyde, Jim, Karunaratne, Asunthy, Kausman, Rick, and Paul A. Komesaroff
Tsai, Adam G., and Thomas A. Wadden
Van Eemeren, Frans H.
Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans
Weight Loss Industry analysis
2017 Retrieved from: https://www.franchisehelp.com/industry-reports/weight-loss-industry-report/
Welsby, Philip D.
Cited by 1 other publications
Justice, Jacob William
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.