Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 9:3 (2020) ► pp.368398
Alchourrón, Carlos E. and Eugenio Bulygin
1971Normative Systems. Wien: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert
1978Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Henry Hansmann, Reiner Kraakman and Mariana Pargendler
2017What Is Corporate Law? In R. Kraakman et al.. The Anatomy of Corporate Law, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Averitt, Neil W. and Robert H. Lande
1997Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law. Antitrust Law Journal 651: 713–756.Google Scholar
Ayal, Adi
2014Fairness in Antitrust: Protecting the Strong from the Weak. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert
1994Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2000Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare
1764Dei delitti e delle pene. Livorno: Marco Coltellini.Google Scholar
Beck, Gunnar
2013The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bengoetxea, Joxerramon
1993The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice: Towards a European Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, Curtis
2009Contracts as Plans. University of Illinois Law Review 20091: 341–401.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M.
1974Good Economics. Bad Law. Virginia Law Review 601: 483–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido
1970The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
2016The Future of Law and Economics. Essays in Reform and Recollection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, Damiano and Giovanni Tuzet
2005Interpretive Scorekeeping. In R. Guastini and P. Comanducci (eds.), Analisi e diritto 2005, pp. 81–97. Turin: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
2007On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation? Ratio Juris 201: 32–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument. Informal Logic 281: 31–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The A Simili Argument: An Inferentialist Setting. Ratio Juris 221: 499–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010What is the Reason for This Rule? An Inferential Account of the Ratio Legis. Argumentation 241: 197–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Use and Abuse of Intratextual Argumentation in Law. Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 31: 33–52.Google Scholar
Carbonell, Flavia
2013Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions. In C. Dahlman and E. Feteris (eds.), Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, pp. 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L.
2001The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craswell, Richard
1993Default Rules, Efficiency, and Prudence. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 31: 289–302.Google Scholar
Cseres, Katherine
2007The Controversies of the Consumer Welfare Standard. The Competition Law Review 31: 121–173.Google Scholar
Cserne, Peter
2012Consequence-Based Arguments in Legal Reasoning: A Jurisprudential Preface to Law and Economics. In K. Mathis (ed.), Efficiency, Sustainability, and Justice to Future Generations, pp. 31–54. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold
1969Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint. The Journal of Law & Economics 121: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Driesen, David and Richard P. Malloy
2017Critiques of Law and Economics. In F. Parisi (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics. Volume 1: Methodology and Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald
1980Is Wealth a Value? The Journal of Legal Studies 9(2): 191–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A.
2013Harmonization, Heterogeneity and Regulation: CESL, the Lost Opportunity for Constructive Harmonization. Common Market Law Review 501: 207–224.Google Scholar
Esposito, Fabrizio
2013Alcune note su di un approccio economico ordinalista allo studio del diritto. Ars Interpretandi 2013/21: 151–183.Google Scholar
2016Efficienza paretiana ed efficienza allocativa. Considerazioni teoriche per giuseconomisti. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 2016/11: 225–236.Google Scholar
2017aAlcune note sui disaccordi teorico-interdisciplinari del diritto con l’economia. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 2017/11: 91–117.Google Scholar
2017bHow The Behavioural Turn In Law And Economics Vindicates The New Haven School. Oeconomia 7(3): 375–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Law and Economics United in Diversity: Minimalism, Fairness, and Consumer Welfare in EU Antitrust and Consumer Law (PhD Thesis). Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
2020Reverse Engineering Legal Reasoning. In P. Cserne and F. Esposito (eds.), Economics in Legal Reasoning, pp. 139–154. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Uniting Law and Economics in Diversity. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Esposito, Fabrizio and Lucila De Almeida
2017A Shocking Truth for Law and Economics: Consumer Welfare Explains the Internal Market for Electricity Better Than Total Welfare. In K. Mathis and B. Huber (eds.), Energy Law and Economics in Europe, pp. 101–133. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Esposito, Fabrizio and Stefan Grundmann
2017Investor-Consumer or Overall Welfare: Searching for the Paradigm of Recent Reforms in Financial Services Contracts. EUI Law Department Research Paper Series 2017/51.Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline
2005The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 191: 459–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno, Carlos Gómez Ligüerre and Lela Mélon
2017Legal Origins and the Efficiency Dilemma. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geradin, Damien, Anne Layne-Farrar and Nicholas Petit
2012EU Competition Law and Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jolls, Christine, Cass R. Sunstein and Richard H. Thaler
1998Theories and Tropes: A Reply to Posner and Kelman. Stanford Law Review 501: 1593–1608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, Louis
2012On the Choice of Welfare Standards in Competition Law. In D. Zimmer (ed.), The Goals of Competition Law, pp. 3–26. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, Louis and Steven Shavell
2002Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, Jody S.
2001Reconciling Autonomy and Efficiency in Contract Law: The Vertical Integration Strategy. Philosophical Issues 111: 420–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M.
1983Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations. The University of Chicago Law Review 501: 652–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil and Richard S. Summers
(eds.) 1991Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Monti, Giorgio
2007EC Competition Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Pablo E. and Jorge L. Rodríguez
2014Deontic Logic and Legal Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nazzini, Renato
2011The Foundations of European Union Competition Law: The Objective and Principles of Article 102. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogus, Anthony
2010Law And Economics in The Legal Academy, or, What I Should Have Said to Discipulus. University of Toronto Law Journal 601: 169–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papayannis, Diego M.
2013Spiegazione funzionale e analisi concettuale. Sull’incidenza dei modelli economici nello studio della pratica giuridica. Ars interpretandi 2013/21: 69–109.Google Scholar
Patterson, Dennis
2005Interpretation in Law. San Diego Law Review 421: 685–709.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.
1979Some Uses and Abuses of Economics in Law. The University of Chicago Law Review 461: 281–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985Wealth Maximization Revisited. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 2(1): 85–105.Google Scholar
2001Antitrust Law, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Norms and Values in the Economic Approach to Law. In A. Hatzis and N. Mercuro (eds.), Law and Economics: Philosophical Issues and Fundamental Questions, pp. 1–15. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankari, Suvi
2013European Court of Justice Legal Reasoning in Context. Amsterdam: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, Daniel
2012The Silent Lamb and the Deaf Wolves: Constitutional Pluralism, Preliminary References and the Role of Silent Judgments in EU Law. In M. Avbelj and J. Komárek (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, pp. 285–317. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam
2007An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations. Hampshire, UK: Harriman House. Original ed. 1776.Google Scholar
Tuori, Karlo
2015European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuzet, Giovanni
2019Calabresi and Mill: Bilateralism, Moral Externalities and Value Pluralism. Global Jurist 19(3): 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Wright, Georg H.
1963Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas
2009Dialectical Shifts Underlying Arguments from Consequences. Informal Logic 291: 54–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wils, Wouter P. J.
2006Optimal Antitrust Fines: Theory and Practice. World Competition 29(2): 183–208.Google Scholar
Wróblewski, Jerzy
1974Legal Syllogism and Rationality of Judicial Decision. Rechtstheorie 51: 33–46.Google Scholar
Zamir, Eyal and Doron Teichman
2018Behavioural Law and Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Qi
2017What Can Economists Learn from Contract Lawyers? In S. E. Weishaar, N. Phillipsen and W. Xu (eds.), Regulatory Reform in China and the UK. A Law and Economics Perspective, pp. 117–138. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar