Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in ContextVol. 2:3 (2013) ► pp.346–351
Book review
. Proceedings of the 4th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation Tokyo: The Japan Debate Association, 2012.
Reviewed by
References
Andone, C.
2013 Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Clarke, L., and C. Chess
2008 “Elites and Panic: More to Fear than Fear Itself.” Social Forces, 87 (2): 993–1014.
Fogelin, R.
(1985) The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic, 7(1).
Ihnen, C. J.
2012 Pragmatic Argumentation in Law-making Debates. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser
2007 “The Contextuality of Fallacies.” Informal Logic 27 (1): 59–68.
van Eemeren, F. H.
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F. H., P. Houtlosser, C. Ihnen, and M. Lewinski
2010 “Contextual Considerations in the Evaluation of Argumentation. In Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning and Argumentation, ed. by C. Reed, and C. W. Tindale, 115–133. London: College Publications.
Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo
1986 Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer Verlag.