How do Chilean seniors think about arguing?
Their motivations, understandings, and emotional registration of interpersonal arguing
This project investigates orientations toward interpersonal arguing among Chilean seniors
(
N = 243), having a mean age of 72 years. We found no prior attention to seniors in the interpersonal arguing
literature, and only a little to Chileans. Sited within the US framework for studying interpersonal arguing (see
Hample, 2016), this project collected seniors’ responses to survey items indexing
argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames, personalization of conflict, and power distance. Our exploratory work
involved use of a second sample of Chilean undergraduates (
N = 80) for comparison. Comparisons showed that the
seniors were less likely to argue, especially for play. Seniors were more interested in asserting dominance and were less
cooperative and civil. Few sex differences were observed among the seniors, whereas quite a few had been previously found for
Chilean undergraduates. These differences are attributed to the age of the seniors, although the possibility of a cadre effect is
considered. Neither Chilean seniors nor younger adults displayed negative correlations between approaching and avoiding arguments,
a result which has become an increasingly urgent theoretical issue across the world.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Chilean seniors
- 3.Aging and personality
- 4.Sex differences in arguing orientations
- 5.Summarizing people’s orientations to interpersonal arguing
- 6.Method
- 6.1The senior sample
- 6.2The undergraduate sample
- 6.3Instrumentation and procedures
- 7.Results
- 7.1Comparing chilean seniors and undergraduates
- 7.2Comparing men and women
- 7.3Correlations among the measures
- 8.Discussion
- 8.1Immediate implications
- 8.2More speculative implications
- 8.2.1Linguistic capability
- 8.2.2Political/Social considerations
- 9.Conclusions
-
References
References (51)
References
Birditt, K. S., & Fingerman, K. L. (2005). Do
we get better at picking our battles? Age group differences in descriptions of behavioral reactions to interpersonal
tensions. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological
Sciences, 60B1, 121–128. 

Birditt, K. S., Fingerman, K. L., & Almeida, D. M. (2005). Age
differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary
study. Psychology and
Aging, 201, 330–340. 

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness:
Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality
in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality
Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 541, 853–863. 

Dickson, F. C., Hughes, P. C., Manning, L. D., Walker, K. L., Bollis-Pecci, T., & Gratson, S. (2002). Conflict
in later-life, long-term marriages. Southern Communication
Journal, 671, 110–121. 

Diehl, M., Coyle, N., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (1996). Age
and sex differences in strategies of coping and defense across the life span. Psychology and
aging, 111, 127–139. 

Etchegaray, N., Scherman, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2018). Testing
the Hypothesis of ‘‘Impressionable Years’’ With Willingness to Self-Censor in
Chile. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edy012. 

Gavrilov, L. A., & Heuveline, P. (2003). Aging
of population. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The
encyclopedia of
population (pp. 32–37) New York: Macmillan.
Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E., Park, D. C., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). Reasoning
about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 1071, 7246–7250. 

Hample, D. (2003). Arguing
skill. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook
of communication and social interaction
skills (pp. 439–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hample, D. (2016). The
psychological approach to interpersonal argumentation in the U.S. argumentation
community. In F. Paglieri, L. Bonelli, & S. Felletti (Eds.), The
psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and
persuasion (pp. 257–274). London: College Publications.
Hample, D. (2018). Interpersonal
arguing. New York: Peter Lang. 

Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2010). Taking
conflict personally and its connections with aggressiveness. In T. A. Avtgis & A. S. Rancer (Eds.), Arguments,
aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and
research (pp. 372–387). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor, and Francis.
Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M. (1995). A
Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the
instrument. Communication
Quarterly, 431, 297–319. 

Hample, D., & Irions, A. (2015). Arguing
to display
identity. Argumentation, 291, 389–416. 

Holley, S. R., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2013). Age-related
changes in demand-withdraw communication behaviors. Journal of Marriage and
Family, 751, 822–836. 

INE. (2018). Estimaciones y
proyecciones de la población de Chile 1992–2050, custom data acquired via website. [URL], Retrieved: 04/27/2019.
Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A
conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 461, 72–80. 

Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal
aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication
Monographs, 531, 61–69. 

Juncos, O., Pereiro, A. & Rodriquez, M. (2005). Narrative
speech in aging: Quantity, information content, and cohesion. Brain and
Language, 951, 423–434. 

Johnson, A. J., Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2014). Understanding
argumentation in interpersonal communication: The implications of distinguishing between public and personal
topics. Communication
Yearbook, 381, 145–174. In E. L. Cohen (Ed.) New York: Taylor & Francis.
Kemper, S., Thompson, M. & Marquis, J. (2001). Longitudinal
change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional
content. Psychology and
Aging, 161, 600–614. 

Kline, S. L. (1998). Influence
opportunities and the development of argumentation competencies in
childhood. Argumentation, 121, 367–385. 

Lemaster, P., Delaney, R., & Strough, J. (2017). Crossover,
degendering, or…? A multidimensional approach to life-span gender development. Sex
Roles, 761, 669–681. 

Lin, R., Chen, H. Y., Li, H., & Li, J. (2019). Effects
of creative expression therapy on Chinese elderly patients with dementia: an exploratory randomized controlled
trial. Neuropsychiatric Disease and
Treatment, 151, 2171–2180. 

Macedo, A. P. (2011). The
development of children’s argument
skills. Dissertation, University of London.
Mackenzie, C. (2000). Adult
spoken discourse: The influences of age and education. International Journal of Language and
Communication
Disorders, 351, 269–285. 

Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (1996). Communication
traits: A cross-generalization investigation. Communication Research
Reports, 131, 58–67. 

McHorney, C. A. (1996). Measuring
and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 health
survey. The
Gerontologist, 361, 571–583. 

Miles, J. R. & Stine–Morrow, E. A. L. (2004). Adult
age differences in self regulated learning in reading sentences. Psychology &
Aging, 191, 626–636. 

Rancer, A. S., & Avtgis, T. A. (2014). Argumentative
and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application, 2d.
ed. New York: Peter Lang.
Rapanta, C. (2019). Argumentation
strategies in the classroom. Wilmington DE: Vernon Press.
Reiter, A. M., Kanske, P., Eppinger, B., & Li, S. C. (2017). The
aging of the social mind-differential effects on components of social understanding. Scientific
reports, 7 (11046), 1–8. 

Schullery, N. M., & Schullery, S. E. (2003). Relationship
of argumentativeness to age and higher education. Western Journal of
Communication, 671, 207–223. 

Schuman, H., & Corning, A. D. (2006). Comparing
Iraq to Vietnam: Recognition, recall, and the nature of cohort effects. Public Opinion
Quarterly, 701, 78–87. 

Schuman, H., & Corning, A. D. (2017). The
conversion of generational effects into collective memories. International Journal of Public
Opinion
Research, 291, 520–532.
Schuman, H., Corning, A., & Schwartz, B. (2012). Framing
variations and collective memory. Social Science
History, 361, 451–472. 

Silver, C. B. (2003). Gendered
identities in old age: Toward (de) gendering?. Journal of aging
studies, 171, 379–397. 

Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age
differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional
sample. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 1001, 33–348. 

Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2007). The
Dumbledore hypothesis of cognitive aging”. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 16 (6), 295–299. 

Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Aging
and self-regulated language processing. Psychological
Bulletin, 132 (4), 582–606. 

Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Shake, M. C., Miles, J. R., & Noh, S. R. (2006). Adult
age differences in the effects of goals on self-regulated sentence processing. Psychology &
Aging, 21 (4), 790–803. 

Strough, J., Leszczynski, J. P., Neely, T. L., Flinn, J. A., & Margrett, J. (2007). From
adolescence to later adulthood: Femininity, masculinity, and androgyny in six age groups. Sex
roles, 571, 385–396. 

Tessler, M., Konold, C., & Reif, M. (2004). Political
generations in developing countries: Evidence and insights from Algeria. Public Opinion
Quarterly, 681, 184–216. 

Turabian, J. L. (2019). Differential
characteristics in communication and relationship of the general practitioner with the elderly
patient. Journal of Family Medicine
Forecast, 2 (2), 1017.
Ulatowska, H. (Ed). (1985). The
aging brain. Communication in the
Elderly. Boston: College-Hill.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population
Division. (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017
Revision, custom data acquired via website. [URL] Retrieved: 2/23/2019
Véliz, M., Riffo, B., & Arancibia, B. (2010). Envejecimiento
cognitivo y procesamiento del lengauje: cuestiones relevantes. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y
Aplicada
Concepción, 48 (1), 75–103.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring
Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of
CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer
Marketing, 231, 193–210.
Zietlow, P. H., & Sillars, A. L. (1988). Life-stage
differences in communication during marital conflicts. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships, 51, 223–245. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Hoogenboom, Lilian M., Maria T.M. Dijkstra & Bianca Beersma
2024.
Conflict personalization: a systematic literature review and the development of an integrative definition.
International Journal of Conflict Management 35:2
► pp. 309 ff.

Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila & Dale Hample
2022.
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing.
Argumentation 36:3
► pp. 365 ff.

Mamberti, Juan & Dale Hample
2022.
Interpersonal arguing in Argentina.
Argumentation and Advocacy 58:3-4
► pp. 214 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.