Article in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:3 (2021) ► pp. 397–417

The co-construction of campaign argumentation on U.S.A. late-night talk shows

| University of Amsterdam
This study shows that when presidential candidates visit, late-night talk show discourse is argumentative, and that this argumentation is co-constructed by the host and the candidate. Through their questions, hosts implicitly invoke arguments by casting doubt on the candidate’s presidential bid. By treating the host’s questions as critical questions expressing skepticism whether people should vote for the candidate, politicians prototypically use two types of argument schemes to defend their case. First, to argue that their policy proposals are needed, candidates use complex problem-solving argumentation. Second, to maintain that they have the skills and character to succeed as president, candidates use symptomatic argumentation. In their response, candidates also deal with other critical questions belonging to the argument scheme invoked through the host’s question. Which critical questions of that argument scheme the candidate addresses in addition to the one posed by the host depends on the type of question the host has asked.
Keywords: argument scheme, complex problem-solving argumentation, Entertainment-Political Interview, late-night talk show, political argumentation, pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, symptomatic argumentation, U.S.A. presidential elections
References

References

Andone, Corina
2013 Argumentation in Political Interviews. Analyzing and Evaluating Responses to Accusations of Inconsistency. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew A.
2005 “Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 213–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baym, Geoffrey
2013 “Transformations in Hybrid TV Talk: Extended Interviews on The Daily Show (.Com).” In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, ed. by Mats Ekström and Andrew Tolson, 63–86. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1983 “The Dynamics of Political Interviews.” Text 3(2): 131–53.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Sue
2014 “Performing Ordinary : Politicians, Celebrity, & the Politics of Representation on Entertainment Talk.” The Popular Culture Studies Journal 2(1&2): 109–39.Google Scholar
Craig, Robert T.
2016 “Metacommunication.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, ed. by Klaus B. Jensen and Robert T. Craig, online. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H.
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham, CH: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs
1993 Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2008 “Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves.” Journal of Pragmatics 40(3): 475–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Tjark Kruiger
2015 “Identifying Argumentation Schemes.” In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 703–12. Cham, CH: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, Göran
2010 “Politicians in Celebrity Talk Show Interviews: The Narrativization of Personal Experiences.” Text and Talk 30(5): 529–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Lauren, and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young
2008 “Late-Night Comedy as a Gateway to Traditional News: An Analysis of Time Trends in News Attention among Late-Night Comedy Viewers during the 2004 Presidential Primaries.” Political Communication 25(4): 401–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock
2002 “Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean .” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 727–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and Monica Malamud-Makowski
1996 “English and Spanish Contrastive Discourse Markers.” Language Sciences 18(3–4): 863–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garssen, Bart
2017 “The Role of Pragmatic Problem-Solving Argumentation in Plenary Debate in the European Parliament.” In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 31–51. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Eean, and Menno H. Reijven
2021 “U.S. Presidential candidates’ use of the first-person plural on Entertainment-Political Interviews.” In Fresh Perspectives on Major Issues in Pragmatics, ed. by Monika Kirner-Ludwig, pp. 61–81. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Sara W. Smith
1998 “And People Just You Know like ‘Wow’. Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies.” In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv, 171–201. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel
1977 Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda
2007 “Argumentation in Political Talk Show Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(8): 1388–1419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, Laura
2015 “The Celebrity Talk Show: Norms and Practices.” Discourse, Context & Media 10: 27–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Politicians on Celebrity Talk Shows.” Discourse, Context & Media 20: 146–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
2013 “The Late-Night TV Talk Show as a Strategic Genre in American Political Campaigning.” In Analysing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 321–43. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moy, Patricia, Michael A. Xenos, and Verena K. Hess
2006 “Priming Effects of Late-Night Comedy.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(2): 198–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niven, David, Robert R. Lichter, and Daniel Amundson
2003 “The Political Content of Late Night Comedy.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8(3): 118–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, Michael
2014 Talk Show Campaigns. Presidential Candidates on Daytime and Late Night Television. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reijven, Menno H., Eean Grimshaw, and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2020 “ ‘That’s Not Funny!’ Identity and the organization of interaction on USA entertainment-political interviews.” Discourse, Context & Media 35: 100386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70(6), 1075–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner
2009 “Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(2), 91–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2007 “`Look’-Prefaced Turns in First and Second Position: Launching, Interceding and Redirecting Action.” Discourse Studies 9(3): 387–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
2001 “Argumentation, Explanation and Causality. An Exploration of Current Linguistic Approaches to Textual Relations.” In Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. by Ted J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren, 231–46. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taniguchi, Masaki
2011 “The Electoral Consequences of Candidate Appearances on Soft News Programs.” Political Communication 28(1): 67–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2008 Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar