Bricks as arguments
Representing polysemy in Amsterdam School architectural design
Sarah J. Constant | University of Pittsburgh
This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table
method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam
School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories
or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The
expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present
promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as
arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method
capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.
Keywords: Amsterdam School, architecture, argumentation, iconography, polylogue, polysemy, visual argument
Article outline
- Multimodal and visual argumentation
- Social housing in the Netherlands
- Bricks as arguments
- The ‘Spire’ at Het Schip
- Decorative brickwork at Het Schip and De Dageraad
- The ‘Verboden’ sign at Het Schip
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
-
Works cited
Published online: 14 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con
References
Works cited
Aakhus, Mark and Sally Jackson
Amsterdam School Museum Het Schip
Appelman, Sonja, Wouter Beekers, John Cüsters, Jos van der Lans, Margriet Pflug
Barteet, Cody
Birdsell, David and Leo Groarke
Blesser, Barry and Linda-Ruth Salter
Bock, Manfred, Sigrid Johannisse, and Vladimir Stissi
Casciato, Maristella
Chryslee, Gail J., Sonja K. Foss and Arthur L. Ranney
Dodd, N. L. and M. P. P. Stultjens
Finnegan, Cara
Gibbons, Michelle
Gilbert, Michael A.
Groarke, Leo, Catherine H. Palczewski, and David Godden
Hahner, Leslie A.
Hauser, Gerard
Heijdra, Ton, Alice Roegholt, and Richelle Wansing
Hermans, Louis M.
Iedema, Rick
Johnson, Ralph H.
2005 Why Visual Arguments? ed. by H. V. Hansen, C. Tindale, and R. H. Johnson. http://web2.uwindsor.ca/courses/philosophy/johsoa/visargtext.htm
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen
Lewiński, Marcin
Lewiński, Marcin and Mark Aakhus
Leydesdorff, Selma
O’Keefe, Daniel J.
Och, Gunnar
Palczewski, Catherine H.
Patterson, Steven W.
Pfister, Damien Smith and Carly S. Woods
Roberts, Kathleen G.
Roque, Georges
Searing, Helen E.
1971 Housing in Holland and the Amsterdam School. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.
Torrens, Kathleen M.
Van Eemeren, Frans and Rob Grootendorst