Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac
Balancing effectiveness and reasonableness of argumentation in the context of the Athenian Assembly of the People
Iva Svačinová | University of Hradec Králové
The article focuses on the analysis of Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac delivered in the Athenian Assembly of the People in 349 BC. It is a case study of the famous § 24 in which Demosthenes calls for the attack on Philip of Macedonia, based on a hypothetical reciprocal scenario: Philip would attack Athens in a similar situation. The first part of the paper offers an argumentative characterisation of the Assembly of the People. Subsequently, the historical and situational circumstances of the speech are described, and an argumentative reconstruction of Demosthenes’ speech is presented. The evaluation of the speech’s context serves as a reference point for the analysis of strategic maneuvering by putting forward the argument in § 24. The argument is analysed in terms of three strategic maneuvering aspects: choice of topical potential, adaptation to audience demands, and presentational devices.
Keywords: Assembly of the People, Demosthenes, communicative activity type,
First Olynthiac
, pragma-dialectics, strategic maneuvering
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Macro-context: The course of the Assembly of the People
- 1.1Argumentative characterisation of the Assembly of the People
- 1.1.1Initial situation
- 1.1.2Procedural and material starting points
- 1.1.3Argumentative means and criticism
- 1.1.4Outcome of discussion
- 1.1Argumentative characterisation of the Assembly of the People
- 2.Meso-context: Historical circumstances of Demosthenes’ First Olynthiac
- 2.1Historical context
- 2.2Circumstances of Demosthenes’ speech
- 3.Micro-context: Reconstructing the argumentation in the First Olynthiac speech
- 4.Strategic maneuvering with argument in § 24
- 4.1Adaptation to audience demands
- 4.1.1The strategy of including the hypothetical scenario among the material points of the audience of Athenians
- 4.1.2The strategy of including the principle of legitimacy among the material points of the audience of Athenians
- 4.2Choice from the topical potential
- 4.2.1Choice of the scheme with respect to the anticipated demands of the audience
- 4.2.2The assessment of alternative choices in relation to the starting points of the audience
- 4.2.3Strategic choice of argument
- 4.3Presentational devices
- 4.3.1Presentational device used to strengthen the acceptability of the hypothetical scenario
- 4.3.2Presentational devices used to strengthen the acceptability of the principle of legitimacy
- 4.1Adaptation to audience demands
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 14 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20013.sva
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20013.sva
References
Andone, Corina
Cartwright, Mark
2018 “Athenian Democracy.” In Ancient History Encyclopedia. Available at: https://www.ancient.eu/Athenian_Democracy/
Demosthenes
1930a “First Olynthiac.” In Demosthenes with an English translation by J. H. Vince, M.A., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, London: William Heinemann Ltd., available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg001.perseus-eng1
1930b “Third Philippic.” In Demosthenes with an English translation by J. H. Vince, M.A., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, London: William Heinemann Ltd., available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg009.perseus-eng1:1
van Eemeren, Frans H.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen
2009 “In varietate concordia – united in diversity: European Parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type.” In OSSA conference archive, available at: http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA8/papersandcommentaries/39/
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Garssen, Bart
1997 Argumentatieschema’s in PragmaDialectisch Perspectief. Een Theoretisch en Empirisch Onderzoek. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Dordrecht: ICG Printing b.v.
Gerring, John
Hansen, Morgens H.
Hogg, Michael A.
Hunt, Peter
Kienpointner, Manfred
Leland, Thomas
McGraw-Hill Dictionary
2002 “Two can play this game”. In McGraw-Hill Dictionary, available at: http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Two+can+play+this+game
Mohammed, Dima
2009 ‘The honourable gentleman should make up his mind’: Strategic Manoeuvring with Accusations of Inconsistency in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Available at: https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/37620
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
Plug, H. José
Plutarch
1919 “Demosthenes.” In Plutarch’s Lives. With an English translation by Bernadotte Perrin. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. London. William Heinemann Ltd., available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg054.perseus-eng1:1.1
van Poppel, Lotte
2013 Getting the vaccine now will protect you in the future! A pragma-dialectical analysis of strategic maneuvering with pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Available at: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1919829/128801_thesis.pdf
Ryder, T. T. B.
Scott, Elizabeth M.
1991 A critical analysis of the Scholia Demosthenica on the First Olynthiac. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Glasgow. Available at: http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3971/
Worthington, Ian