Review published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:3 (2021) ► pp. 418–423
Book review

Emanuele Brambilla. The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/aic​.18

Reviewed by
| Università della Svizzera italiana
Published online: 14 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20016.gre
References
Andone, C.
2013 Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
2010 Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp. 7–29). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garssen, B.
2017 The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp. 31–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garzone, G.
2000 Textual analysis and interpreting research. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 101, 69–88.Google Scholar
Garzone, G., & Santulli, F.
2004 What can corpus linguistics do for critical discourse analysis? In A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. Collection Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication (pp. 351–368). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marzocchi, C.
1994 Interpretazione e argomentazione: alcune note preliminari per l’analisi dell’argomentazione nel discorso politico. In R. D. Snel Trampus (Ed.), Studi di neerlandistica. Traduzione, interpretazione, lingua (pp. 63–72). Trieste: LINT.Google Scholar
1997 The analysis of argumentation and its relevance to interpretation research and theory. In K. Klaudy & J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre Necesse Est. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting, 5–7 September, 1996, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 179–185). Budapest: Scholastica.Google Scholar
Mohammed, D.
2018 Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Accusations of inconsistency in response to criticism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
2001 Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salvato, L.
2019 The translator’s visibility. Translators’ critical argumentation on their translating effort. In Garrsen, B., et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1022–1033). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Williams, M.
2004 Translation quality assessment: An argumentation-centred approach. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D.
2014 Political argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegelmueller, G. W., & Kay, J.
1997 Argumentation: Inquiry and advocacy, 3rd edition. Boston/London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar