(De-)constructing New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern’s initiative to wear the hijab after the Christchurch terrorist attack
Critical perspectives on newspapers’ discourse and argumentation
This paper examines the discursive construction of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern after she wore a veil following
the unprecedented terror attack in two mosques in the city of Christchurch in 2019. The articles analyzed are collected from three
main newspapers published in New Zealand’s three main cities. Analyzed using principles and tools from Critical Discourse Studies
(CDS) and Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) more specifically, the articles reveal key arguments from both sides i.e. in support of
and against this unparalleled initiative on behalf of a political leader in the western world. On the one hand, the majority of
the news articles under analysis portray PM’s initiative as one that attempts to mitigate tension and conflict while bringing
solidarity to a grief-stricken nation; and thus, are based on the ‘locus from ontological implications’. While the perspectives
that oppose the initiative vary from explicit racist ones that present Muslims as threat to Zealand, to those who strongly believe
such actions support the women oppression. Through a (de-)construction of the arguments opposing this move, the findings
demonstrate that the opposition towards PM’s initiative is based on two main loci namely the ‘locus from correlates’ and the
‘locus from termination and setting up’
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Perceptions and representations of the Hijab
- 3.CDS and argumentation
- 3.1From DHA to AMT: Studying argumentative inferences in media discourse
- 4.The data
- 5.Data analysis
- 6.Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (49)
References
Amossy, R. 2009a. The New Rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis. Argumentation, 231, 313–324.
Amossy, R. 2009b. Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic, 29 (3), 252–267.
Ash, E., Tuffin, K., Kahu, E. 2019. Representing Islam: Experiences of Women Wearing Hijab in New Zealand. New Zealand Psychology Society 48 (1):114–121.
Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos, and T. McEnery. 2013. Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bevelander, P. & Wodak, R. (Eds.). 2019. Europe at the crossroads: Confronting populist, nationalist, and global challenges. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
Boukala, S. 2016. Rethinking topos in the Discourse Historical Approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies 18 (3): 249–268.
Boukala, S. 2019. European identity and the representation of Islam in the mainstream press: Argumentation and media discourse. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Bullock, K. H., and Jafri, G. J. 2000. Media (mis) representations: Muslim women in the Canadian nation. Canadian Woman Studies 20(2): 35–40.
Candlin, C. (1997). General editor’s preface. In B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. x–xiv). London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
Fournier, P. 2013. Headscarf and burqa controversies at the crossroad of politics, society and law. Social Identities 19(6): 689–703.
Greco Morasso, S. 2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case-study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies 14(2): 197–216.
Greco Morasso, S. & Morasso, C. 2014. “Argumentation from expert opinion in science journalism: The case of Eureka’s Fight Club.” In Rhétorique et Cognition eds. by Oswald & T. Herman, 185–213, Bern: Peter Lang.
Herman, T. & Serafis, D. 2019. Emotions, argumentation and argumentativity: Insights from an analysis of newspapers headlines in the context of the Greek crisis. Informal Logic, 39(4): 373–400.
Kabir, S. N., & Bourk, M. 2012. Representing Islam and Muslims in New Zealand Newspapers. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 32(3): 324–338.
Rane, H., Ewart, J., & Martinkus, J. 2014. Media Framing of the Muslim world: Conflicts, Crises and Contexts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reisigl, M. 2014. “Argumentation analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A methodological framework”. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by C. Hart and P. Cap, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. 2009. The Discourse-Historical Approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. By R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 2nd ed. 87–121. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: Sage.
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. 2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by R. Wodak, & M. Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.
Rheindorf, M. & Wodak, R. 2018. Borders, fences, and limits – Protecting Austria from refugees: Metadiscursive negotiation of meaning in the current refugee crisis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 15–38.
Rigotti, E. & Greco, S. 2019. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer.
Ruby, T. F. (2006, January). Listening to the voices of hijab. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 54–66). Pergamon.
Said, E. W. 1979. Orientalism. Vintage.
Salahshour, N. & Salahshour, F. 2012. Representation of the East in Western Literature (A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Travelogue Eothen). Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 3(2): 531–541.
Salahshour, N., & Boamah, E. 2020. Perceived Discrimination as Experienced by Muslims in New Zealand Universities. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(3): 497–512.
Salahshour, N. 2020. A Critique of New Zealand’s Exclusive Approach to Intercultural Education. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1–18.
Scott, J. W. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. & Jermini-Martinez Soria, C. 2020a. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: Evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(5): 545–565.
Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. & Jermini-Martinez Soria, C. 2020b. Multimodal Arguments in the Mainstream Press: Illustrating Portrayals of Migration. In: Cook, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12. Ontario: University of Windsor. Available at: [URL] (accessed 31.05.2021) ‘Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity’: Proceedings of the OSSA12 Conference. Available at: [URL]
Serafis, D., Raimondo, C., Assimakopoulos, S., Greco, S. & Rocci, A. 2021. Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: Evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis’. Discourse & Communication, 15 (5): 559–581.
Todorov, T. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle (Theory & History of Literature. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press.
van Dijk, T. A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. Α. 2008. Discourse and Power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
van Eemeren, F. H. 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer.
Wodak, R. 2001. “The discourse historical approach”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by R. Wodak & M. Meyer, 63–95. London: Sage.
Wodak, R. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds). 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Žagar, I. 2010. Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6(1): 3–27.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Rasoulikolamaki, Sahar, Surinderpal Kaur & Neda Salahshour
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.