Cover not available
Article published In:
Argumentation in European Politics
Edited by Corina Andone and Bart Garssen
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1] 2022
► pp. 69–87

Arguing through quotations

The case of European Commission press releases

| University of Amsterdam,
This paper analyses and evaluates the use of arguments in which quotations are employed to convince the addressees of the acceptability of a proposed action. Based on the European Commission’s press releases, a communicative practice in which quotations are typically employed, the study demonstrates that quotations function as weak authority arguments that are not likely to be accepted by the addressees if they are not further supported by other argument types.
Keywords: press releases, quotations, authority arguments, European Commission
Article outline
  • 1.Background, research question, goal
  • 2.Approach
  • 3.Press releases accompanying recommendations
    • 3.1European Commission’s recommendations
    • 3.2Argumentative pattern of press releases accompanying recommendations
  • 4.Using quotations as authority arguments
    • 4.1Strategies of quoting
    • 4.2The quality of the quote
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Case law/Legal Opinions
  • EU official documents and reports
  • Semi-structured interviews with European Commission officials
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 8 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21023.and
References (37)
References
Andone, Corina and Alfonso LomelíHernández, J. 2019. “Scientific arguments in policy-making.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (2): 195–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andone, Corina, and Sara Greco. 2018. “Evading the Burden of Proof in European Union Soft Law Instruments: the Case of Commission Recommendations.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 31 (1): 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing quoting as a ubiquitous meta-communicative act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. By Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–28. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catenaccio, Paola. 2008. “Press releases as a hybrid genre: Addressing the informative/promotional conundrum.” Pragmatics 18 (1): 9–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coman-Kund, Florin, and Corina Andone. 2019. “European Commission’s soft law instruments: In between legally binding and non-binding norms. In Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings, Patricia Popelier, Helen Xantaki, JoséTiago Silveira, Franz Ulhmann and William Robinson (eds.), 183–208. Oxford: Hart-Nomos Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Louise. 2010. Rethinking the BSE Crisis. A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The “trust” heuristic: Arguments from authority in public health.” Health Communication 29 (10): 1043–1056. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, Pieter. 2019. “Media logic and grand theories of European integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1193–1212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2020a. “Doing things with quotes: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 84–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. “’And I quote’: Forms and functions of quotations in Prime Minister’s questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleissner, Martin, and Claes De Vreese. 2005. “News about the EU Constitution: Journalistic challenges and media portrayals of the European Union Constitution.” Journalism 6 (2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, Femke de Vries, and Wilte Zijlstra. 2018. “Breaking bad news without breaking trust: The effects of a press release and newspaper coverage on perceived trustworthiness.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 1 (1): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Geert. 1999. Preformulating the News: An Analysis of the Meta-pragmatics of Press Releases. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Christoph. 1999. “Political legitimacy and the indivisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (4): 617–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sissons, Helen. 2012. “Journalism and public relations. A tale of two discourses.” Discourse and communication 6 (3): 271–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sleurs, Kim, Geert Jacobs, and Luuk Van Waes. 2003. “Constructing press releases, constructing quotations: A case study.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (2): 192–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefan, Oana. 2013. Soft Law in Court. Competition Law, State Aid and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 2020. “The Future of European Union Soft Law: A Research and Policy Agenda for the Aftermath of Covid-19.” Journal of International and Comparative Law 7 (2): 329–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terpan, Fabien. 2015. “Soft Law in the European Union – the Changing Nature of EU Law.” European Law Journal 21 (1): 68–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2016. “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 30 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2017. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 2000. Scare Tactics. Arguments that Appeal to Fears and Threats. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Case law/Legal Opinions
Case C-16/16P Belgium v Commission EU:C:2018:79.
Opinion of Advocate General Villalón. 2015. Opinion of 14 January 2015 Case C-62/14 Gauweiler and others EUCLI:EU:C:2015:7.Google Scholar
EU official documents and reports
European Commission. 2003. Style guide for press releases. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.Google Scholar
Commission Recommendation 2011/711/EU of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation, OJ L 283/39.
European Commission. 2020. Strategic Plan 2020–2024. DG Communication. Ref. Ares(2020)6501662-09/11/2020.Google Scholar
Press release ‘A Europe that protects: Commission reinforces EU response to illegal content online.’ IP/18/1169.
Commission Recommendation C(2019) 2335 final of 26 March 2019 on cybersecurity of 5G networks.
Commission Recommendation C(2019) 7131 final of 8 October 2019 establishing a common “Practical Handbook for Border Guards” to be used by Member States’ competent authorities when carrying out the border control of persons and replacing Commission Recommendation C(2006) 5186 of 6 November 2006.
Press release ‘Secure 5G networks: Commission endorses EU toolbox and sets out next steps.’ IP/20/123.
Van den Brande, L. 2017. Reaching out to EU citizens. A new opportunity. ‘About us, with us, for us’. Report of the European Commission.Google Scholar
Semi-structured interviews with European Commission officials
Interview. DG COMM, 21 November 2019.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.