Arguing through quotations
The case of European Commission press releases
This paper analyses and evaluates the use of arguments in which quotations are employed to convince the addressees of the acceptability of a proposed action. Based on the European Commission’s press releases, a communicative practice in which quotations are typically employed, the study demonstrates that quotations function as weak authority arguments that are not likely to be accepted by the addressees if they are not further supported by other argument types.
Article outline
- 1.Background, research question, goal
- 2.Approach
- 3.Press releases accompanying recommendations
- 3.1European Commission’s recommendations
- 3.2Argumentative pattern of press releases accompanying recommendations
- 4.Using quotations as authority arguments
- 4.1Strategies of quoting
- 4.2The quality of the quote
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
-
Case law/Legal Opinions
-
EU official documents and reports
-
Semi-structured interviews with European Commission officials
References (37)
References
Andone, Corina, and Sara Greco. 2018. “Evading the Burden of Proof in European Union Soft Law Instruments: the Case of Commission Recommendations.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 31 (1): 79–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing quoting as a ubiquitous meta-communicative act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. By Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–28. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coman-Kund, Florin, and Corina Andone. 2019. “European Commission’s soft law instruments: In between legally binding and non-binding norms. In Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings, Patricia Popelier, Helen Xantaki, JoséTiago Silveira, Franz Ulhmann and William Robinson (eds.), 183–208. Oxford: Hart-Nomos Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cummings, Louise. 2010. Rethinking the BSE Crisis. A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cummings, Louise. 2014. “The “trust” heuristic: Arguments from authority in public health.” Health Communication 29 (10): 1043–1056. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cummings, Louise. 2015. Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Wilde, Pieter. 2019. “Media logic and grand theories of European integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1193–1212. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita. 2020a. “Doing things with quotes: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 84–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita. 2020b. “’And I quote’: Forms and functions of quotations in Prime Minister’s questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleissner, Martin, and Claes De Vreese. 2005. “News about the EU Constitution: Journalistic challenges and media portrayals of the European Union Constitution.” Journalism 6 (2): 221–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, Femke de Vries, and Wilte Zijlstra. 2018. “Breaking bad news without breaking trust: The effects of a press release and newspaper coverage on perceived trustworthiness.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 1 (1): 1–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, Christoph. 1999. “Political legitimacy and the indivisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (4): 617–639. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sissons, Helen. 2012. “Journalism and public relations. A tale of two discourses.” Discourse and communication 6 (3): 271–294. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sleurs, Kim, Geert Jacobs, and Luuk Van Waes. 2003. “Constructing press releases, constructing quotations: A case study.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (2): 192–212. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stefan, Oana. 2013. Soft Law in Court. Competition Law, State Aid and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stefan, Oana. 2020. “The Future of European Union Soft Law: A Research and Policy Agenda for the Aftermath of Covid-19.” Journal of International and Comparative Law 7 (2): 329–350. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Terpan, Fabien. 2015. “Soft Law in the European Union – the Changing Nature of EU Law.” European Law Journal 21 (1): 68–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2016. “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 30 (1): 1–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, Douglas. 2000. Scare Tactics. Arguments that Appeal to Fears and Threats. Dordrecht: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Case law/Legal Opinions
Case C-16/16P Belgium v Commission EU:C:2018:79.
Opinion of Advocate General Villalón. 2015. Opinion of 14 January 2015 Case C-62/14 Gauweiler and others EUCLI:EU:C:2015:7.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
EU official documents and reports
European Commission. 2003. Style guide for press releases. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Commission Recommendation 2011/711/EU of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation, OJ L 283/39.
European Commission. 2020. Strategic Plan 2020–2024. DG Communication. Ref. Ares(2020)6501662-09/11/2020.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Press release ‘A Europe that protects: Commission reinforces EU response to illegal content online.’ IP/18/1169.
Commission Recommendation C(2019) 2335 final of 26 March 2019 on cybersecurity of 5G networks.
Commission Recommendation C(2019) 7131 final of 8 October 2019 establishing a common “Practical Handbook for Border Guards” to be used by Member States’ competent authorities when carrying out the border control of persons and replacing Commission Recommendation C(2006) 5186 of 6 November 2006.
Press release ‘Secure 5G networks: Commission endorses EU toolbox and sets out next steps.’ IP/20/123.
Van den Brande, L. 2017. Reaching out to EU citizens. A new opportunity. ‘About us, with us, for us’. Report of the European Commission.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semi-structured interviews with European Commission officials
Interview. DG COMM, 21 November 2019.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.