Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 12:2 (2023) ► pp.159–210

Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity

ORCID logo | University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow

The institute of legality for traders, including business contracts, business correspondence, and legal proceedings concerning economic cases, appeared in Mesopotamia first since the early dynastic period (ca. 2900–2350 B.C.). This institute became well organized for the period of the third dynasty of Ur (from the 22nd to the 21st century B.C.). This tradition was continued in the Babylonian as well as other Mesopotamian dynasties. As a consequence, Akkadian speaking traders preferred logical tools in their business correspondences, too. Therefore, the business contracts and business correspondence satisfied the main argumentative stages of legal proceedings. In late antiquity since the 2nd century A.D. Greek, Bactrian, and Sogdian were one of the most important languages for traders of Silk Road with very high standards of argumentation as main tools of dispute resolutions taken from the Babylonians. In this paper, I analyze some general features of these standards.

Keywords: Bactrian, Greco-Buddhism, legal argumentation, pragma-dialectics, Silk Road, world-systems analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Silk Road in the classical antiquity
  • 3.Legal documents in Bactrian and Sogdian
  • 4.Pragma-dialectical analysis of legal documents in Akkadian, Aramaic, Greek, and Bactrian
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22003.sch
References (47)
Apel, K.-O.
Transformation der Philosophie. 21 Bände Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1973.Google Scholar
Becker, T.
The Pragmatics of Argumentation, [in:] A. C. Schalley (Ed.) Practical Theories and Empirical practice: A Linguistic Perspective. John Benjamins 2012, pp. 257–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermejo, L.
Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory. Vol. 201. Dordrecht: Springer 2011 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braudel, F.
Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century. Vol. 3: The Perspective of the World. Oakland 1992.Google Scholar
Casson, L.
(Ed.) The Periplus Maris Erythraei. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1989.Google Scholar
Chavannes, É.
Les pays d’Occident d’après le Wei lio, T’oung pao 61: 519–571 1905 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohoon, J. W., Crosby, H. L.
(Trs.) Dio Chrysostom. Discourses 31–36. Loeb Classical Library 358. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1940.Google Scholar
Culbertson, L. E.
Dispute Resolution in the Provincial Courts of the Third Dynasty of Ur. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan 2009.
De La Vaissière, É.
Sogdian traders: a history Translated by J. Ward. Boston: Brill 2005 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T.
Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Second Edition. Springer 2017 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, A. G., Gills, B.
The five thousand year world system: an interdisciplinary introduction, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 181: 1–79 1992.Google Scholar
The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? London 1993.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard 1969.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bde 1–21. Baden-Baden 1988.Google Scholar
Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Neuwied 1962.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. H., Blair, J. A.
Logical Self-Defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 1977.Google Scholar
Kahane, H.
Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric. The Use Of Reason in Everyday Life. Belmont, SA: Wadsworth 1971.Google Scholar
Kern, L. H., Mirels, H. L., and Hinshaw, V. G.
Scientists’ understanding of propositional logic: An experimental investigation, Social Studies of Science 13 (1): 131–146 1983 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, R.
Kuṣāṇa Emperors and Indian Buddhism: Political, Economic and Cultural Factors Responsible for the Spread of Buddhism through Eurasia, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36(3): 434–448 2013 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livshits, V. A.
Sogdian epigraphy of Central Asia and Semirech’e. Tr. from the Russian by T. Stableford Ed. by N. Sims-Williams. London: School of Oriental and African Studies 2015.Google Scholar
McCrindle, J. W.
(Tr.) The Christian Topography of Cosmas, an Egyptian Monk. (Works issued by the Hakluyt Society 1, 98) 1897, repr. New York 1964.Google Scholar
Moran, W. L.
(Ed.) The Amarna letters. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 1992 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neelis, J. E.
Early Buddhist transmission and trade networks: mobility and exchange within and beyond the northwestern borderlands of South Asia. Leiden: Brill 2011 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, S., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C., Miecznikowski, J., Rocci, A.
(Eds.) Argumentation and meaning: Semantic and pragmatic reflexions. John Benjamins 2020 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
Traité de l’argumentation : La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1958.Google Scholar
Porten, B.
The Elephantine papyri in English: three millennia of cross cultural continuity and change. Leiden, New York, Koln: Brill 1996 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, A.
Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication, Intercultural Pragmatics 3(4): 409–442 2006 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, A.
On the Origin of Indian Logic from the Viewpoint of the Pāli Canon, Logica Universalis 131: 347–393 2019a DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Did the Neo-Babylonians Construct a Symbolic Logic for Legal Proceedings? Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 6(1): 31–82 2019b.Google Scholar
Legal argumentation in Mesopotamia since Ur III, Journal of Argumentation in Context, 9(2): 126–154 2020 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towards the Definition of Logical Competence, Cogency 13 (2): 7–40 2021a DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nāgārjunian-Yogācārian Modal Logic versus Aristotelian Modal Logic, Journal of Indian Philosophy 49(3): 467–498 2021b DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sims-Williams, N.
Bactrian Documents from Northern Afghanistan I: Legal and Economic Documents. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.Google Scholar
Bactrian Documents from Northern Afghanistan II: Letters and Buddhist Texts. London: Nour Foundation 2007.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, N., de Blois, F.
The Bactrian Calendar, Bulletin of the Asia Institute 101: 149–165 1996.Google Scholar
Strauch, I.
(Ed.) Foreign Sailors on Socotra. The inscriptions and drawings from the Cave of Hoq. Bremen 2012.Google Scholar
Spar, I., von Dassow, E.
Cuneiform Texts in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Volume III: Private Archive Texts from the First Millennium B.C. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2000.Google Scholar
Stark, R., Finke, R.
Beyond Church and Sect: Dynamics and Stability in Religious Economics, [in:] T. G. Jelen (ed.) Sacred Markets, Sacred Canopies: Essays on religious markets and religious pluralism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield 2002, pp. 31–62.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S.
The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1958; revised edition 2003.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.Google Scholar
Rules for argumentation in dialogues, Argumentation 2(4): 499–510 1988 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Foris publications 1984 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., Henkemans, A. F. S.
Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Vol. 121. Springer Science & Business Media 2007 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I.
A World-System Perspective on the Social Sciences, The British Journal of Sociology 271: 343–352 1976 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, D.
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Series: Studies in Argumentation Theory. Routledge 1995.Google Scholar
Witek, M., Witczak-Plisiecka, I.
Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions. Brill 2019 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
Philosophical Investigations trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan 1958.Google Scholar