Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 12:3 (2023) ► pp.278–306

The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām

Some reflections on Ṭaşköprüzâde, Gelenbevî, and Saçaklızâde

ORCID logo | University of Tübingen
Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories are introduced.
Keywords: epistemological argumentation theory, Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theory, munāẓara , kalām , Ṭaşköprüzâde, Gelenbevî, Saçaklızâde
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Syllogistic reasoning
  • The epistemological theory of argumentation and kalām
  • Logic and argumentation theory: The way to Ottoman argumentation theory
  • The munāẓara and its main features
    • Taʿrīf (definition), taqsīm (division), and taṣdīq (confirmation)
    • Manʿ (rejection, refusal), muʿāraḍa (opposition, contradicting someone), naqḍ (contradiction, controversy, inconsistency)
  • Are jadal and munāẓara rhetorical or epistemic?
  • Classifications of premises and propositions
  • Outlook
  • Notes
  • Glossary
  • References
Published online: 15 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22021.inc
References (63)
References
al-Abharī, Athīr al-Dīn Mufaḍḍal ibn ʿUmar. 2012. Īsāgūjī. Istanbul: Hāshimī.Google Scholar
Abū Zahra, Muḥammad. 1934. Tārīkh al-jadal. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʾArabi.Google Scholar
Arnaldez, Roger. 1991. “Manṭiḳ.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 61, 442–452. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Astren, Fred. 2010. “Qirqisānī, Jacob al-.” In Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World, ed. by Norman A. Stillman, and Phillip I. Ackerman-Lieberman, vol. 41, 136–140. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peri J., et al. 2009. “The Encyclopaedia of Islam: Glossary and Index of Terms to Volumes I-XI and to the Supplement.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, index volume, 142–592. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Belhaj, Abdessamad. 2016. “Ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara: The Neglected Art of Disputation in Later Medieval Islam.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 261: 291–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blankinship, Khalid. 2008. “The Early Creed.” In The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, ed. by Tim Winter, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brockelmann, Carl. 1960. “al-Abharī.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 11, 98–99. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Çapak, Ibrahim. 2013. “Mantik.” In Islam felsefesi: Tarih ve problemler, ed. by Cüneyt M. Kaya, 541–568. Istanbul: ISAM.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Saçaklızade’ye göre münazara ilmi.” In I. Kahramanmaraş sempozyumu, ed. by Said Öztürk, Mahmut Nedim Tepebaşı, Hacı Kutlu, and Mustafa Bekerecioğlu, 89–98. Istanbul: Maraşde.Google Scholar
Carter, M. G., and G. J. H. van Gelder. 2000. “Tamt̲h̲īl.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 101, 179–180. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Caspar, Robert. 1998. A Historical Introduction to Islamic Theology: Muhammad and the Classical Period. Rome: PISAI.Google Scholar
Çelebi, İlyas, and Bekir Topaloğlu. 2010. Kelâm terimleri sözlüğü. Istanbul: ISAM.Google Scholar
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2010. Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic, 900–1900. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Theology and Logic.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. by Sabine Schmidtke, 408–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enriques, Federigo. 1927. Zur Geschichte der Logik: Grundlagen und Aufbau der Wissenschaft im Urteil der mathematischen Denker, trans. by Ludwig Bieberbach. Wiesbaden: Vieweg and Teubner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrieli, F. 1960. “Baḥt̲h̲.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 11, 949. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gardet, Louis. 1960. “Al-Burhān.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 11, 1326–1327. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gelenbevî, İsmail ibn Mustafa ibn Mahmud. 2013. Ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara, ed. by Khālid ibn Khalīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Zāhidī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Burhân-ı Gelenbevî.” In Abdünnâfî İffet Efendi, Tercüme-i Burhân-ı Gelenbevî, ed. by Ibrahim Çapak et al. Istanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
Gölcük, Şerafettin, and Yurdagür, Metin. 1996. “Gelenbevî.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 131, 552–555. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groff, Peter S., and Oliver Leaman. 2007. Islamic Philosophy A–Z. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʻAbbāsid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10th Centuries). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, Rosalind Ward. 2009. Logic, Rhetoric and Legal Reasoning in the Qurʾān: God’s Arguments. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. 1993. “Introduction.” In Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians, trans. with an introduction and notes by Wael B. Hallaq, xi–lvii. Oxford: Clarendon Press [repr. 2001]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibn Sīnā. 1952. Al-Shifāʾ, ed by I. Madkour. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaʿa al-Amīriyya.Google Scholar
Al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. n.d. Al-Mawāqif fī ʿilm al-kalām. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.
Ince, Serkan. 2023. Argumentation und Apologetik. Argumentation und erkenntnistheoretische Prinzipien der al-Radd ʿalā al-Naṣārā-Literatur unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Werkes des Ṣāliḥ ibn al-Ḥusayn al-Jaʿfarī (gest. 668/1270). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Karabela, Mehmet. 2011. The Development of Dialectic and Argumentation Theory in Post-Classical Islamic Intellectual History. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Kaya, Eyyüp Said. 2010. “Taklid.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 391, 461–465. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.Google Scholar
Lumer, Christoph. 1988. “The Disputation. A Special Type of Cooperative Argumentative Dialogue.” Argumentation 21: 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Praktische Argumentationstheorie: Theoretische Grundlagen, praktische Begründung und Regeln wichtiger Argumentationsarten. Braunschweig: Vieweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005a. “Introduction. The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation: A Map.” Informal Logic 25 (3): 189–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. “The Epistemological Theory of Argument – How and Why?” Informal Logic 25 (3): 213–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Überreden ist gut, überzeugen ist besser! Argumentativer [sic] Ethos in der Rhetorik.” In Persuasion und Wissenschaft: Aktuelle Fragestellungen von Rhetorik und Argumentationstheorie, ed. by Günther Kreuzbauer, Norbert Gratzl, and Ewald Hiebl, 7–33. Vienna: Lit.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. 1974. “Dialectic and Disputation: The Relation between the Texts of Qirqisani and Ibn ʿAqil.” In Mélanges d’islamologie: Volume dédié à la mémoire de Armand Abel, ed. by Pierre Salmon, vol. 11, 201–206. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
al-Masʿūdī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn. 1986. Murūj al-dhahab wa-maʿādin al-jawhar, ed. by Mufīd Muḥammad Qumayḥa. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
Miller, Larry Benjamin. 1995. “al-Samarḳandī, S̲h̲ams al-Dīn.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 81, 1038–1039. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Özcan, Tahsin. 2008. “Saçaklızâde Mehmed Efendi.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 351, 368–3670. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.Google Scholar
Özen, Şükrü. 1998. “Hilâf.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 171, 527–538. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.Google Scholar
Özervarli, M. Sait. “Gelenbevi, İsmail.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam: Three, ed. by Kate Fleet, Gudrun Krämer, Denis Matringe, John Nawas, and Devin J. Stewart. Leiden: Brill. [URL]
Rescher, Nicholas. 1964. The Development of Arabic Logic. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 2004. History of Western Philosophy. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saçaklızâde Maraşî, Mehmed. 1763. al-Risāla al-waladīya fī fann al-munāẓara, MS Budapest, Arab O. 069/Coll. 9, fols. 136r-146v (dated 1177/1763).Google Scholar
Schaade, A. 1913. “Balāg̲h̲a.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, ed. by Martin T. Houtsma, T. W. Arnold, R. Basset, and R. Hartmann, vol. 11, 637. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Steinschneider, Moritz. 1893. Die arabischen Übersetzungen aus dem Griechischen. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. 1999. “Ibn al-Rāwandī’s sūʾ adab al-mujādala: The Role of Bad Manners in Medieval Disputations.” In The Majlis: Interreligious Encounters in Medieval Islam, ed. by Hava Lazarus-Yaffe, Mark R. Cohen, Sasson Somekh, and Sidney H. Griffith, 60–76. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.Google Scholar
Stock, Kristina. 2005. Arabische Stilistik. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Ṭaşköprüzâde, Ahmed Efendi. 1990. “Ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara”, ed. by Abdurrahim Güzel. Erciyes Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 71: 203–207.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Miftāḥ al-saʿāda wa-miṣbāḥ al-siyāda.” In Mawsūʿat muṣṭalaḥāt Miftāḥ as-saʿāda wa-miṣbāḥ as-siyāda fī mawḍūʿāt al-ʿulūm, ed. by Rafīq al-ʿAjam, and ʿAlī Dahrūj. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān.Google Scholar
Topaloğlu, Bekir. 2016. Kelâm ilmine giriş. Istanbul: Damla.Google Scholar
al-Ṭūfī, Najm al-Dīn. 1987. ʿAlam al-jaḏal fī ʿilm al-jadal, ed. by Wolfhart Heinrichs. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Üçer, İbrahim Halil. 2013. “Antik-Helenistik birikimin İslam dünyasına intikali: Aristotelesçi felsefenin üç büyük dönüşüm evresi.” In Islam felsefesi: Tarih ve problemler, ed. by Cüneyt M. Kaya, 37–90. Istanbul: ISAM.Google Scholar
Ueding, Gert. 2005. Klassische Rhetorik. 4th. ed. München: C. H. Beck. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, H. 1936. “Manṭiḳ.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, ed. by Martin T. Houtsma, T. W. Arnold, R. Basset, and R. Hartmann, vol. 31, 280–283. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans Hendrik, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Ess, Josef. 1966. Die Erkenntnislehre des ʿAḍudaddīn Al-Īcī. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Wagner, Ewald. 1993. “Munāẓara.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. by Peri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol. 71, 565–568. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 1963. Die arabische Rangstreitdichtung und ihre Einordnung in die allgemeine Literaturgeschichte. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Walzer, Richard. 1962. Greek into Arabic: Essays on Islamic Philosophy. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Yavuz, Yusuf Şevki. 2006. “Münâzara.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 311, 576–577. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Taşköprizâde Ahmed Efendi.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 401, 151–152. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.Google Scholar