Interpersonal Argumentation
Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:1 (2015)
Editor
| University of Central Florida
[Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4:1] 2015. v, 133 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
IntroductionHarry Weger, Jr | pp. 1–3
-
Adult as a source of expert opinion in child’s argumentation during family mealtime conversationsAntonio Bova | pp. 4–20
-
The role of communication and coping in emerging adults’ serial arguments with parentsCatherine M. Gaze, Rachel M. Reznik, Courtney Waite Miller and Michael E. Roloff | pp. 21–41
-
A test of dyadic power theory: Control attempts recalled from interpersonal interactions with romantic partners, family members, and friendsNorah E. Dunbar and Amy Janan Johnson | pp. 42–62
-
Attachment style, serial argument, and taking conflict personallyDale Hample and Adam S. Richards | pp. 63–86
-
Irony in interpersonal conflict scenarios: Differences in ironic argument endorsement and suppression across topicsJoshua M. Averbeck | pp. 87–109
-
Extending the argument engagement model: Expected utility and interacting traits as predictors of the intent to argue with friendsAdam S. Richards and Ioana A. Cionea | pp. 110–133
Articles
Subjects
Communication Studies
BIC Subject: HPL – Philosophy: logic
BISAC Subject: LAN015000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric