Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 4:2 (2015) ► pp. 158–199

The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising

| University of Lugano
In this article we present an exploratory investigation of pictorial and multimodal metaphors appearing in print product advertisements; the aim is to ascertain their relevance for the arguments that the ads put forth. Departing from the working hypotheses that advertising is an argumentative activity type employing pictorial and multimodal metaphors, and that these are often examples of visual argumentation, we analyze a small corpus of print product ads by employing the theoretical frameworks offered by Blending Theory and the Argumentum Model of Topics. This allows us to reconstruct the enthymematic structure of advertising arguments highlighting the correspondence between rhetorical tropes and argumentative loci.
Keywords: Argumentum Model of Topics, argumentative relevance, advertising, pictorial and multimodal metaphor, Blending Theory
Published online: 29 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.2.02pol
References

References

Adam, Jean-Michel, and Marc Bonhomme
2012 L’argumentation publicitaire. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio
(ed) 2003 Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroad. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Moutn de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beasley, Ron, and Marcel Danesi
2002 Persuasive Signs: The Semiotics of Advertising. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke
1996 “Toward a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 33: 1–10.Google Scholar
2007 “Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 43: 103–113.Google Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd F.
1959 “Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (4): 399–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, Max
1979 “More about Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, J. Anthony
1996 “The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43: 103–113.Google Scholar
2004 “The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments.” In Defining Visual Rhetorics, ed. by Charles A. Hill and Marguerite Helmers, 41–61. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel
1993 Vico, Metaphor and the Origin of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
2002 La metafora nel pensiero e nel linguaggio. Brescia: La Scuola.Google Scholar
Dirven, René, and Ralf Pörings
(eds) 2002 Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dove, Ian J.
2012 “On Images as Evidence and Arguments.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 223–238. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durant, Alan
2010 Meaning in the Media. Discourse, Controversy and Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007 Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-dialectical Study. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fahnestock, Jeanne
1999 Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011 Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994 Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2002 The Way we Think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2006 [1998] “Conceptual Integration Networks.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, 303–371. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter (Originally published in 1998 in Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133-187). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feteris, Eveline, Leo Groarke, and José Plug
2011 “Strategic Manoeuvring with Visual Arguments in Political Cartoon.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filimon, I. Agatha
2011a “Argumentative Valences of the Key-phrase Value Creation in Corporate Reporting”. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden, and Gordon Mitchell, 461–479. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
2011b “The Persuasiveness of Two-sided Messages in Corporate Reporting Discourse.” Paper presented at the conference Communication and Cognition 2011: Manipulation, Persuasion and Deception in Language , Neuchâtel, January 26th 2011.
Finnegan, Cara A.
2001 “The Naturalistic Enthymeme and Visual Argument: Photographic Representation in the ‘Skull Controversy’.” Argumentation and Advocacy 37: 133–149.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles
1996 Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Review of The Way we Think by G. Fauconnier and M. Turner.” Metaphor and Symbol 19 (1): 83–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Multimodal Metaphor in Ten Dutch TV Commercials.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 1: 15–34.Google Scholar
2008a “Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, 462–482. Cambridge: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b “Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor in Commercials.” In Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, ed. by Edward F. McQuarrie and Barbara J. Phillips, 178–204. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
2009 Metonymy in Visual and Audiovisual Discourse. In The World Told and the World Shown: Issues in Multisemiotics, ed. by Arsenio J. Moya Guijarro and Eija Ventola, 56–74. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2012 “Creativity in Pictorial and Multimodal Advertising Metaphors.” In Discourse and Creativity, ed. by Rodney Jones, 113–132. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
(eds) 2009 Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, Jacobs, David Mazursky, and Sorin Solomon
1999 “The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads.” Marketing Science 18 (3): 333–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, Jacobs, Amnon Lebab, David Mazursky, and Sorin Solomon
2009 Cracking the Ad Code. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara
2011 Argumentation in Dispute Mediation. A Reasonable Way to Handle Conflict. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groarke, Leo
2002 “Towards a Pragma-Dialectics of Visual Argument.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 137–151. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
2009 “Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 229–239. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Hoven, Paul
2012 “The Narrator and the Interpreter in Visual and Verbal Argumentation.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 257–271. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally
1986 “Building a Case for Claims about Discourse Structure.” In Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes, ed. by Donald G. Ellis and William A. Donohue, 129–147. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
1986 “How to Make an Argument from Example in Discourse Analysis.” In Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes, ed. by Donald G. Ellis and William A. Donohue, 149–167. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1990 “On the Especially Nice Fit between Qualitative Analysis and the known Properties of Conversation.” Communications Monographs 57 (3): 243–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 14: 261–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy ad.” Argumentation 20: 421–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Design in Argumentation.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 55–78. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katzav, Joel, and Chris Reed
2004 “On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments.” Argumentation 18 (2): 239–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
2012 “Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes and Figure as a Way of creating Visual Argumentation.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 239–255. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lagerwerf, Luuk, Charlotte M.J. van Hooijdonk, and Ayalies Korenberg
2012 “Processing Visual Rhetoric in Advertisements: Interpretations Determined by Verbal Anchoring and Visual Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1836–1852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
2003 [1980] Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Charles
2007 “Aristotelian Causal Analysis and Creativity in Copywriting: Toward a Rapprochement between Rhetoric and Advertising.” Written Communication 24: 168–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazzali-Lurati, Sabrina, and Chiara Pollaroli
Forthcoming. “Blending Metaphors and Arguments in Advertising.” In Metaphor and Communication ed. by Francesca Ervas and Elisabetta Gola 498 525 Amsterdam John Benjamins
McQuarrie, Edward F., and David G. Mick
1996 “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.” The Journal of Consumer Research 22 (4): 424–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran
2003 Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edimburgh: Edimburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Trevor
1980 “How to do Things with Images: An Essay on the Pragmatics of Advertising.” Theory and Society 9: 603–622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1992 Traité de l’argumentation: la nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Phillips, Barbara J.
2000 “The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Response to Image Ads.” Journal of Advertising 29: 15–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Barbara J., and Edward F. McQuarrie
2004 “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 4 (1/2): 113–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, Adrian
2000 Poetic Effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, Robert C.
1996 “The Relation of Argument to Inference”. In Logic and Argumentation, ed. by Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, and Frank Veltman, 163–178. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian
2009 “A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.” Argumentation 23: 325–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reboul, Olivier
1989 “The Figure and the Argument.” In From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, ed. by Mitchel Meyer, 169–181. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo
2006 “Relevance of Context-bound Loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage.” Argumentation 20: 519–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Locus a causa finali.” In Proceedings of the IADA Workshop Word meaning in argumentative dialogue. Homage to Sorin Stati, ed. by Giovanni Gobber, et al., 559–576. Milano: Educatt.Google Scholar
2009 “Whether and how Classical Topics can be Revived in the Contemporary Theory of Argumentation.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 157–178. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24: 489-512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci
2006 “Towards a Definition of Communication Context. Foundations of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Communication.” Studies in Communication Sciences 6 (2): 155–180.Google Scholar
Ripley, M. Louise
2008 “Argumentation Theorists Argue that an ad is an Argument.” Argumentation 22: 507–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rocci, Andrea
2006 “Pragmatic Inference and Argumentation in Intercultural Communication.” Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (4): 409–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Manoeuvring with Voices: The Polyphonic Framing of Arguments in an Institutional Advertisement.” In Examining Argumentation in Context, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 257–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roque, George
2012 “Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal.” In Topical themes in argumentation theory, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 273–288. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena
2010. “Unrealistic Scenarios, Metaphorical Blends and Rhetorical Strategies across Genres.” English Text Construction 3 (2): 250-274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slade, Christina
2002 “Reasons to Buy: The Logic of Advertisements.” Argumentation 16: 157–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements.” Argumentation 17: 145–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Valerie J.
2007 “Aristotle’s Classical Enthymeme and the Visual Argumentation of the Twenty-First Century.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43: 114–123.Google Scholar
Tardini, Stefano
2005 “Endoxa and Communities: Grounding Enthymematic Arguments.” Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction special issue of Studies in Communication Sciences: 279–294.Google Scholar
Tindale, Christopher
2004 Rhetorical Argumentation. Principles of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas
2007 Media Argumentation. Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Enthymemes and Argumentation Schemes in Health Product ads.” In Proceedings of the Workshop W5: Computational Models of Natural Argument, Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Pasadena, 49–56.
Walton, Douglas, and Fabrizio Macagno
2009 “Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2): 154–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wüest, Jakob T.
2001 “La gerarchia degli atti linguistici nel testo.” Studies in Communication Sciences 1: 195–211.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Argumentation in the Newsroom [Argumentation in Context, 13], Crossref logo
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2016. The argument from expert opinion as other-oriented reference in disciplinary discussions. Studies in Communication Sciences 16:2 ► pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Dahl, John Magnus R.
2015. Visual argumentation in political advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Ervas, Francesca
2019. Metaphor, ignorance and the sentiment of (ir)rationality. Synthese Crossref logo
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021.  In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Greco, Sara, Rebecca Schär, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Mercuri
2018. Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse: Justified reframing as a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion. Discourse Studies 20:6 ► pp. 726 ff. Crossref logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Miecznikowski, Johanna
2020. At the juncture between evidentiality and argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1 ► pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Rocci, Andrea
2017.  In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Rocci, Andrea & Chiara Pollaroli
2018. Introduction: Multimodality in argumentation. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Saltamacchia, Francesca & Andrea Rocci
2019.  In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2020. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 545 ff. Crossref logo
Tseronis, Assimakis & Charles Forceville
2017.  In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Tseronis, Assimakis & Charles Forceville
2017. Arguing Against Corporate Claims Visually and Multimodally: The Genre of Subvertisements. Multimodal Communication 6:2 Crossref logo
Wildfeuer, Janina & Chiara Pollaroli
2017.  In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 190 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.