In this article we present an exploratory investigation of pictorial and multimodal metaphors appearing in print product advertisements; the aim is to ascertain their relevance for the arguments that the ads put forth. Departing from the working hypotheses that advertising is an argumentative activity type employing pictorial and multimodal metaphors, and that these are often examples of visual argumentation, we analyze a small corpus of print product ads by employing the theoretical frameworks offered by Blending Theory and the Argumentum Model of Topics. This allows us to reconstruct the enthymematic structure of advertising arguments highlighting the correspondence between rhetorical tropes and argumentative loci.
Adam, Jean-Michel, and Marc Bonhomme. 2012. L’argumentation publicitaire. Paris: Armand Colin.
Barcelona, Antonio (ed). 2003. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroad. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Moutn de Gruyter.
Beasley, Ron, and Marcel Danesi. 2002. Persuasive Signs: The Semiotics of Advertising. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 1996. “Toward a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 331: 1–10.
Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 2007. “Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 431: 103–113.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1959. “Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (4): 399–408.
Black, Max. 1979. “More about Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blair, J. Anthony. 1996. “The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 431: 103–113.
Blair, J. Anthony. 2004. “The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments.” In Defining Visual Rhetorics, ed. by Charles A. Hill and Marguerite Helmers, 41–61. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Danesi, Marcel. 1993. Vico, Metaphor and the Origin of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Danesi, Marcel. 2002. La metafora nel pensiero e nel linguaggio. Brescia: La Scuola.
Dirven, René, and Ralf Pörings (eds). 2002. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dove, Ian J. 2012. “On Images as Evidence and Arguments.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 223–238. Amsterdam: Springer.
Durant, Alan. 2010. Meaning in the Media. Discourse, Controversy and Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-dialectical Study. New York: Springer.
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1999. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2011. Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way we Think. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2006 [1998]. “Conceptual Integration Networks.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, 303–371. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter (Originally published in 1998 in Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133-187).
Feteris, Eveline, Leo Groarke, and José Plug. 2011. “Strategic Manoeuvring with Visual Arguments in Political Cartoon.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Filimon, I. Agatha. 2011a. “Argumentative Valences of the Key-phrase Value Creation in Corporate Reporting”. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden, and Gordon Mitchell, 461–479. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Filimon, I. Agatha. 2011b. “The Persuasiveness of Two-sided Messages in Corporate Reporting Discourse.” Paper presented at the conference
Communication and Cognition 2011: Manipulation, Persuasion and Deception in Language
, Neuchâtel, January 26th 2011.
Finnegan, Cara A. 2001. “The Naturalistic Enthymeme and Visual Argument: Photographic Representation in the ‘Skull Controversy’.” Argumentation and Advocacy 371: 133–149.
Forceville, Charles. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. New York: Routledge.
Forceville, Charles. 2004. “Review of The Way we Think by G. Fauconnier and M. Turner.” Metaphor and Symbol 19 (1): 83–89.
Forceville, Charles. 2007. “Multimodal Metaphor in Ten Dutch TV Commercials.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 11: 15–34.
Forceville, Charles. 2008a. “Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, 462–482. Cambridge: University Press.
Forceville, Charles. 2008b. “Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor in Commercials.” In Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, ed. by Edward F. McQuarrie and Barbara J. Phillips, 178–204. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Forceville, Charles. 2009. Metonymy in Visual and Audiovisual Discourse. In The World Told and the World Shown: Issues in Multisemiotics, ed. by Arsenio J. Moya Guijarro and Eija Ventola, 56–74. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forceville, Charles. 2012. “Creativity in Pictorial and Multimodal Advertising Metaphors.” In Discourse and Creativity, ed. by Rodney Jones, 113–132. Harlow: Pearson.
Forceville, Charles, and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds). 2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldenberg, Jacobs, David Mazursky, and Sorin Solomon. 1999. “The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads.” Marketing Science 18 (3): 333–351.
Goldenberg, Jacobs, Amnon Lebab, David Mazursky, and Sorin Solomon. 2009. Cracking the Ad Code. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Groarke, Leo. 2002. “Towards a Pragma-Dialectics of Visual Argument.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 137–151. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Groarke, Leo. 2009. “Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 229–239. Amsterdam: Springer.
van den Hoven, Paul. 2012. “The Narrator and the Interpreter in Visual and Verbal Argumentation.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 257–271. Amsterdam: Springer.
Jackson, Sally. 1986. “Building a Case for Claims about Discourse Structure.” In Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes, ed. by Donald G. Ellis and William A. Donohue, 129–147. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Jacobs, Scott. 1986. “How to Make an Argument from Example in Discourse Analysis.” In Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes, ed. by Donald G. Ellis and William A. Donohue, 149–167. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Jacobs, Scott. 1990. “On the Especially Nice Fit between Qualitative Analysis and the known Properties of Conversation.” Communications Monographs 57 (3): 243–249.
Jacobs, Scott. 2000. “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 141: 261–286.
Jacobs, Scott. 2009. “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Design in Argumentation.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 55–78. Amsterdam: Springer.
Katzav, Joel, and Chris Reed. 2004. “On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments.” Argumentation 18 (2): 239–259.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2012. “Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes and Figure as a Way of creating Visual Argumentation.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 239–255. Amsterdam: Springer.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lagerwerf, Luuk, Charlotte M.J. van Hooijdonk, and Ayalies Korenberg. 2012. “Processing Visual Rhetoric in Advertisements: Interpretations Determined by Verbal Anchoring and Visual Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1836–1852.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003 [1980]. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Marsh, Charles. 2007. “Aristotelian Causal Analysis and Creativity in Copywriting: Toward a Rapprochement between Rhetoric and Advertising.” Written Communication 241: 168–187.
Mazzali-Lurati, Sabrina, and Chiara Pollaroli. Forthcoming. “Blending Metaphors and Arguments in Advertising.” In Metaphor and Communication, ed. by Francesca Ervas and Elisabetta Gola, 498–525. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McQuarrie, Edward F., and David G. Mick. 1996. “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.” The Journal of Consumer Research 22 (4): 424–438.
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edimburgh: Edimburgh University Press.
Pateman, Trevor. 1980. “How to do Things with Images: An Essay on the Pragmatics of Advertising.” Theory and Society 91: 603–622.
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1992. Traité de l’argumentation: la nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles.
Phillips, Barbara J. 2000. “The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Response to Image Ads.” Journal of Advertising 291: 15–24.
Phillips, Barbara J., and Edward F. McQuarrie. 2004. “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 4 (1/2): 113–136.
Pilkington, Adrian. 2000. Poetic Effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pinto, Robert C. 1996. “The Relation of Argument to Inference”. In Logic and Argumentation, ed. by Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, and Frank Veltman, 163–178. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Plantin, Christian. 2009. “A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.” Argumentation 231: 325–337.
Reboul, Olivier. 1989. “The Figure and the Argument.” In From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, ed. by Mitchel Meyer, 169–181. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rigotti, Eddo. 2006. “Relevance of Context-bound Loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage.” Argumentation 201: 519–540.
Rigotti, Eddo. 2008. “Locus a causa finali.” In Proceedings of the IADA Workshop Word meaning in argumentative dialogue. Homage to Sorin Stati, ed. by Giovanni Gobber, et al., 559–576. Milano: Educatt.
Rigotti, Eddo. 2009. “Whether and how Classical Topics can be Revived in the Contemporary Theory of Argumentation.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 157–178. Amsterdam: Springer.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24: 489-512.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci. 2006. “Towards a Definition of Communication Context. Foundations of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Communication.” Studies in Communication Sciences 6 (2): 155–180.
Ripley, M. Louise. 2008. “Argumentation Theorists Argue that an ad is an Argument.” Argumentation 221: 507–519.
Rocci, Andrea. 2006. “Pragmatic Inference and Argumentation in Intercultural Communication.” Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (4): 409–442.
Roque, George. 2012. “Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal.” In Topical themes in argumentation theory, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 273–288. Amsterdam: Springer.
Semino, Elena. 2010. “Unrealistic Scenarios, Metaphorical Blends and Rhetorical Strategies across Genres.” English Text Construction 3 (2): 250-274.
Slade, Christina. 2002. “Reasons to Buy: The Logic of Advertisements.” Argumentation 161: 157–178.
Smith, Valerie J. 2007. “Aristotle’s Classical Enthymeme and the Visual Argumentation of the Twenty-First Century.” Argumentation and Advocacy 431: 114–123.
Tardini, Stefano. 2005. “Endoxa and Communities: Grounding Enthymematic Arguments.” Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction special issue of Studies in Communication Sciences: 279–294.
Tindale, Christopher. 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation. Principles of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Walton, Douglas. 2007. Media Argumentation. Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, Douglas. 2009. “Enthymemes and Argumentation Schemes in Health Product ads.” In
Proceedings of the Workshop W5: Computational Models of Natural Argument, Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
, Pasadena, 49–56.
Walton, Douglas, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2009. “Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2): 154–182.
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wüest, Jakob T. 2001. “La gerarchia degli atti linguistici nel testo.” Studies in Communication Sciences 11: 195–211.
2023. Multimodal Representations of Lithuanian Brands: The Case of “Džiugas”, “Rūta” and “Pieno žvaigždės”. Respectus Philologicus :44 (49) ► pp. 25 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2023. Practical (un)cancellability. Journal of Pragmatics 215 ► pp. 84 ff.
Messner, Monika
2023. ‘Domani a quest’ora potresti essere qui’: multimodal practices for representing temporality in destination advertising. Visual Communication
Messner, Monika
2024. Harmony in diversity: exploring cross-linguistic, cross-cultural and multimodal dimensions of temporality within tourism discourse. Multimodal Communication 13:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Pinto, Rosalice & Fabrizio Macagno
2023. Argumentação verbo-visual no gênero textual anúncio publicitário: uma proposta de análise. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 39:2
Bura, Kateryna
2022. Місце мультимодальної арґументації в процесі ухвалення рішень. Multiversum. Philosophical almanac 1:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Wildfeuer, Janina & Joseph Adika Coffie
2022. #socialiseresponsibly. Analyzing the Rhetorical Structure of Heineken TV Commercials During the Pandemic. Frontiers in Communication 7
Ervas, Francesca
2021. Metaphor, ignorance and the sentiment of (ir)rationality. Synthese 198:7 ► pp. 6789 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Rhetorics. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1431 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2021. From visual rhetoric to multimodal argumentation: exploring the rhetorical and argumentative relevance of multimodal figures on the covers of The Economist. Visual Communication 20:3 ► pp. 374 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2020. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 545 ff.
2018. Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse: Justified reframing as a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion. Discourse Studies 20:6 ► pp. 726 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.