Article published in:
Argumentation in Journalism: Professional practices and the public sphere
Edited by Corina Andone and Andrea Rocci
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1] 2016
► pp. 18
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rocci, Andrea & Carlo Raimondo
2017.  In The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations,  pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bal, Bal Krishna, and Patrick Saint-Dizier
2009 “Towards an Analysis of Argumentation Structure and the Strength of Arguments in News Editorials”. In Persuasive Technology and Digital Behaviour Intervention Symposium, ed. by J. Masthoff and F. Grasso, 64–67. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2008 “Talk in Interaction as a Locus For Media Studies”. In L’Analyse Linguistique des Discours des Médias: Théories, Méthodes, et Perspectives, ed. by Marcel Burger, 83–109. Quebec: Nota Bene.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002The News Interview. Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Peter A.
2011Controversy as News Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, Adam Jaworski, and William Housley
2008 “Generating News: Agenda Setting in Radio Broadcast News”. In The Analysis of Language: Discourse in Media, ed. by Marcel Burger, 133–154. Québec: Nota Bene.Google Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto
2007 “Content Analysis: Objective, Systematic, and Quantitative Description of Content”. In Content AnalysisContent Analysis, ed. by Roberto Franzosi xxi–l. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Freeman, James B.
2005Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara
2011Argumentation in Dispute Mediation: A Reasonable Way to Handle Conflict. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Geert
1999Preformulating the News. An Analysis of the Metapragmatics of Press Releases. Amsterdam/ New York: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López Pan, Fernando
2015 “The Newspaper as an Epideictic Meeting Point”. Argumentation 29: 285–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, Rudi
2014Corporate Argumentation in Takeover Bids. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, Daniel
2003 “Progression Analysis (PA): Investigating Writing Strategies at the Workplace”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (6): 907–921. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas
2006Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, E., and Andrea Rocci
2006 “Towards a Definition of Communication Context”. Studies in Communication Sciences 6 (2): 155–180.Google Scholar
Rocci, A. and M. Zampa
2013 “Review of P. A. Cramer’s Controversy as News Discourse”. Argumentation 27 (3): 327–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
1958/2008The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1988News as Discourse. Hillsdale NJ ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Bejamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation : the Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Hout, Tom
2010 Writing from Sources. Ethnographic Insights into Business News Production . Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universiteit Gent.
White, Peter R.R.
2012 “Exploring the Axiological Workings of “Reporter Voice” News Stories-Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning”. Discourse, Context and Media 1 (2-3): 57–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar