Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 5:2 (2016) ► pp.113138
References
Baker, Paul
2006Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L.
2003 “Presidential Campaign Discourse as a Causal Factor in Election Outcome.” Western Journal of Communication 671: 97–112.Google Scholar
2007Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L., and William T. Wells
1996Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966Problèmes de lingàstique generale. Paris, Gallimard; It. transl., 1971. Problemi di linguistica generale. Milano, Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
Bishop, George F., Robert G. Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck
(eds) 1980The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral, and Policy Perspectives. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B., and Mitchell S. McKinney
(eds) 1994The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Degano, Chiara
2007 “Presupposition and Dissociation in Discourse: A Corpus Study.” Argumentation 211: 361–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Discorsi di guerra: il prologo del conflitto iracheno nella stampa britannica e italiana. Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.Google Scholar
2010 “Indicators of Argumentation in Arbitration Awards: A Diachronic Perspective.” In The Discourses of Dispute Resolution, ed. by Vijay K. Bhatia, Christopher N. Candlin, and Maurizio Gottiin. 189–205. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012a “Arguments by Analogy in Arbitration Awards.” In Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realisations, ed. by Vijay K. Bhatia, Giuliana Garzone, and Chiara Degano, 138–151. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2012bDiscourse Analysis, Argumentation Theory and Corpora. An Integrated Approach. Milano: Arcipelago Edizioni.Google Scholar
2014 “Genre Variation in Electoral Campaigns: Adaptation to the Audience in UK Posters and TV Debates.” In Evolution in Genres: Emergence, Variation, Multimodality, ed. by Paola Evangelisti Allori, Vijay K. Bhatia, and John A. Bateman, 327–355. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957/1968 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930-55.” In Studies in Linguistic Analysis (special volume of the Philological Society), Oxford, The Philological Society: 1–32; reprinted in Palmer, F. R. (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952-59, London, Longman: 168-205.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne
2011 “Corpus Based Critical Discourse Analysis.” Paper presented at the Corpus Linguistics 2011, conference , ICC Birmingham, 20-22 July.
Friedenberg, Robert V.
(ed) 1994Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates, 1960-1992. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli
2004 “What can Corpus Linguistics do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 351–368. Bern: Peter Lang:Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1994 [1985]An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hellweg, Susan A., Micheal Pfau, and Robert B. Steven
1992Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hinck, Edward A.
1993Enacting the Presidency: Political Argument, Presidential Debates, and Presidential Character. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen H., and David S. Birdsell
1988Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Danette I.
2005 “Feminine Style in Presidential Debate Discourse, 1960-2000.” Communication Quarterly 53 (1): 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Sidney
2000Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mayer, Michael A., and Diana B. Carlin
1994 “Debates as a Voter Education Tool.” In The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus, ed. by Diana B. Carlin and Mitchell S. McKinney, 127–138. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mazzi, Davide
2007 “The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and a Corpus Perspective.” Argumentation 211: 21–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012, “Analogy in History. A Corpus-Based Study.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson
1996Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Newton N., and Craig L. LaMay
2008Inside the Presidential Debates - Their Improbable Past and Promising Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mochales, Raquel, and Aagie Ieven
2009 “Creating an Argumentation Corpus: Do Theories Apply to Real Arguments? A Case Study on the Legal Argumentation of the ECHR.” In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law . New York: ACM.
Norrick, Neil
2000Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran A.
2009 “Implicit Dialogical Premises, Explanation as Argument: A Corpus-Based Reconstruction.” Informal Logic 29 (1): 15–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, John Morley, and Louann Haarman
(eds) 2004Corpora and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press (trans.). [1958. Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhetorique, Presses Universitaires de France].Google Scholar
Reed, Chris
2006 “Preliminary Results from an Argument Corpus.” In Linguistics in the Twenty-First Century, ed. by Eloína M. Bermúdez and Leonel R. Miyares, 185–196. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci
2005 “From Argument Analysis to Cultural Keywords (and Back Again)”. In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 125–142.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, Andrea
2009 “Modalities as Indicators in Argumentative Reconstruction.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 207–228. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubinelli, Sara
2009Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Dortdecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sala, Michele
2008 “Argumentative Styles as Cultural Identity Traits in Legal Studies.” In Identity Traits in English Academic Discourse, ed. by Davide S. Giannoni and Stefania Maci, Special issue of Linguistica e Filologia, 271: 93–113.Google Scholar
Santulli, Francesca
2010 “Costruire il mito fra l’enunciazione e la performatività: Obama et alii .” In Visione politica e strategie linguistiche, ed. by Donatella Montini, 65–77. Roma: Rubettino.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Alan
2000 [2008]Presidential Debates: Forty Years of High-Risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
2004Wordsmith Tools 4. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1996Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragmadialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragmadialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2002Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation.” Argumentation 201: 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragmadialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rees, M. Agnes
2005 “Indicators of Dissociation.” In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 53–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žagar, Igor Ž.
2007 “Arguing from Large Corpora: Some Epistemological and Methodological Dilemmas; Experimental Study Aimed at Quantifying Political Argumentation.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and Bart Garssen, 1553–1558. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, David
2009 “Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation.” In Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 115–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Degano, Chiara & Federico Giulio Sicurella
2019. Chapter 2. A dialogue on populism?. In Imagining the Peoples of Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 83],  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement: An Argumentation Perspective. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31],  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Serakioti, Dimitra & Petros Stefaneas
2022. Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation. Studia Humana 11:3-4  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 january 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.