Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 5:2 (2016) ► pp.113–138

Corpus linguistics and argumentation

Retrieving argumentative patterns in UK prime ministerial debates

| Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”
This paper explores the viability of a synergy between corpus linguistics and the study of argumentation in context. While quantitative approaches to the study of discourse have been profitably integrated at the levels of lexico-grammar and syntax, more rarely has this been the case for higher levels of analysis such as argumentative structures. Such an approach would help identify those recurring patterns of argumentation that build up cumulatively, and which can only be identified in larger samples of discourse. In particular this paper concerns how the tools of corpus linguistics can be put to use for the analysis of strategic manoeuvring, and especially topical selection. In order to do so, the televised prime ministerial debates held on the occasion of the 2010 general election in the UK will be taken as a case study, with a focus on the use of linguistic indicators that might help retrieve argumentative patterns.
Keywords: Prime ministerial debates, political discourse, topical selection, UK general elections, discourse analysis, indicators of argumentation, corpus linguistics, leaders' debates
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.2.01deg
References (56)
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L. 2003. “Presidential Campaign Discourse as a Causal Factor in Election Outcome.” Western Journal of Communication 671: 97–112.Google Scholar
. 2007. Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L., and William T. Wells. 1996. Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de lingàstique generale. Paris, Gallimard; It. transl., 1971. Problemi di linguistica generale. Milano, Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
Bishop, George F., Robert G. Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck (eds). 1980. The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral, and Policy Perspectives. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B., and Mitchell S. McKinney (eds). 1994. The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Degano, Chiara. 2007. “Presupposition and Dissociation in Discourse: A Corpus Study.” Argumentation 211: 361–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Discorsi di guerra: il prologo del conflitto iracheno nella stampa britannica e italiana. Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Indicators of Argumentation in Arbitration Awards: A Diachronic Perspective.” In The Discourses of Dispute Resolution, ed. by Vijay K. Bhatia, Christopher N. Candlin, and Maurizio Gottiin. 189–205. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Arguments by Analogy in Arbitration Awards.” In Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realisations, ed. by Vijay K. Bhatia, Giuliana Garzone, and Chiara Degano, 138–151. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Discourse Analysis, Argumentation Theory and Corpora. An Integrated Approach. Milano: Arcipelago Edizioni.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Genre Variation in Electoral Campaigns: Adaptation to the Audience in UK Posters and TV Debates.” In Evolution in Genres: Emergence, Variation, Multimodality, ed. by Paola Evangelisti Allori, Vijay K. Bhatia, and John A. Bateman, 327–355. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957/1968. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930-55.” In Studies in Linguistic Analysis (special volume of the Philological Society), Oxford, The Philological Society: 1–32; reprinted in Palmer, F. R. (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952-59, London, Longman: 168-205.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne. 2011. “Corpus Based Critical Discourse Analysis.” Paper presented at the Corpus Linguistics 2011, conference , ICC Birmingham, 20-22 July.
Friedenberg, Robert V. (ed). 1994. Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates, 1960-1992. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli. 2004. “What can Corpus Linguistics do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 351–368. Bern: Peter Lang:Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994 [1985]. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hellweg, Susan A., Micheal Pfau, and Robert B. Steven. 1992. Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hinck, Edward A. 1993. Enacting the Presidency: Political Argument, Presidential Debates, and Presidential Character. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen H., and David S. Birdsell. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Danette I. 2005. “Feminine Style in Presidential Debate Discourse, 1960-2000.” Communication Quarterly 53 (1): 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Sidney. 2000. Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mayer, Michael A., and Diana B. Carlin 1994. “Debates as a Voter Education Tool.” In The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus, ed. by Diana B. Carlin and Mitchell S. McKinney, 127–138. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mazzi, Davide. 2007. “The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and a Corpus Perspective.” Argumentation 211: 21–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012, “Analogy in History. A Corpus-Based Study.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Newton N., and Craig L. LaMay. 2008. Inside the Presidential Debates - Their Improbable Past and Promising Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mochales, Raquel, and Aagie Ieven. 2009. “Creating an Argumentation Corpus: Do Theories Apply to Real Arguments? A Case Study on the Legal Argumentation of the ECHR.” In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law . New York: ACM.
Norrick, Neil. 2000. Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran A. 2009. “Implicit Dialogical Premises, Explanation as Argument: A Corpus-Based Reconstruction.” Informal Logic 29 (1): 15–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, John Morley, and Louann Haarman (eds). 2004. Corpora and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press (trans.). [1958. Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhetorique, Presses Universitaires de France].Google Scholar
Reed, Chris. 2006. “Preliminary Results from an Argument Corpus.” In Linguistics in the Twenty-First Century, ed. by Eloína M. Bermúdez and Leonel R. Miyares, 185–196. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci. 2005. “From Argument Analysis to Cultural Keywords (and Back Again)”. In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 125–142.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, Andrea. 2009. “Modalities as Indicators in Argumentative Reconstruction.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 207–228. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubinelli, Sara. 2009. Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Dortdecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sala, Michele. 2008. “Argumentative Styles as Cultural Identity Traits in Legal Studies.” In Identity Traits in English Academic Discourse, ed. by Davide S. Giannoni and Stefania Maci, Special issue of Linguistica e Filologia, 271: 93–113.Google Scholar
Santulli, Francesca. 2010. “Costruire il mito fra l’enunciazione e la performatività: Obama et alii .” In Visione politica e strategie linguistiche, ed. by Donatella Montini, 65–77. Roma: Rubettino.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Alan. 2000 [2008]. Presidential Debates: Forty Years of High-Risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2004. Wordsmith Tools 4. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragmadialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragmadialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation.” Argumentation 201: 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragmadialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rees, M. Agnes. 2005. “Indicators of Dissociation.” In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 53–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žagar, Igor Ž. 2007. “Arguing from Large Corpora: Some Epistemological and Methodological Dilemmas; Experimental Study Aimed at Quantifying Political Argumentation.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and Bart Garssen, 1553–1558. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, David. 2009. “Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation.” In Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 115–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement: An Argumentation Perspective. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Serakioti, Dimitra & Petros Stefaneas
2022. Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation. Studia Humana 11:3-4 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Degano, Chiara & Federico Giulio Sicurella
2019. Chapter 2. A dialogue on populism?. In Imagining the Peoples of Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 83], ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Quest for Argumentative Equivalence [Argumentation in Context, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.