David Zarefsky. Political Argumentation in the United States. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014.

Reviewed by

Gordon R. Mitchell

Published online: 20 October 2016

https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.2.06mit

References (11)

References

Brockriede, W. 1974. “Rhetorical Criticism as Argument.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 601: 165–174.

Burke, K. 1937. Attitudes Toward History. Boston: Beacon Press.

Fogelin, R. J. 1982. Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Formal Logic, 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.

Leff, M. (ed). 2008. “David Zarefsky and Reasonable Argument.” Special issue of Argumentation & Advocacy 451: 61–105.

Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 341: 57–111.

Olson, K., M. W. Pfau, B. Ponder, and K. H. Wilson (eds). 2012. Making the Case: Advocacy and Judgment in Public Argument. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

Palczewski, C. H., and J. Fritch (eds). 2012. Forum: Argument Scholars Respond to Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Human Reason. Argumentation & Advocacy 481, 174–193.

Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise On Argumentation, ed. by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver (Trans.) Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958).

Zarefsky, D. 2014. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

2009. “What does an Argument Culture Look Like?” Informal Logic 291: 296–308.

2006. “Strategic Maneuvering Through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric.” Argumentation 201: 399–416.