Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event
The case of the soma mine disaster
Yeliz Demir | Department of English Linguistics, Hacettepe University, Ankara
It is an essential requirement of democracy that politicians provide account of their words and actions to the public. However, being able to account is especially important when a politician or the party he/she is representing is assumed responsible for a critical event that has undesirable consequences for the public. Under such a condition, political press conferences serve as an instrument for a politician to justify the position of the government by means of argumentation. By adopting the pragma-dialectical framework, this paper sets out to explain how a politician maneuvers strategically in a press conference for the purpose of diminishing political responsibility when his party which is in charge of the government is assumed responsible for a critical event. The paper draws its data from the political press conference held by Erdoğan, a former Prime Minister of Turkey, following the mine accident that took place in Soma, Turkey, in 2014.
References (30)
APA (American Press Association)
2016 Principles of Journalism. Retrieved January 20, 2016, from
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Besette, J.M
2001 “
Accountability: Political.” In
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. by
N.J. Smelser and
P.B. Baltes, 38–41. Retrieved from
[URL]. DOI:
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, A
2006 “
Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences.”
Discourse and Society 17 (2): 173–203.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, S
2006 “
Arenas of Interaction in the New Media Era.” In
News from the Interview Society, ed. by
M. Ekström,
Å. Kroon, and
M. Nylund, 239–264. Göteborg: Nordicom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, S., and Heritage, J
2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
CSGB
6331 Sayılı İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kanunu [
Law No. 6331 Occupational Health and Safety Law]. Retrieved November 8, 2015, from
[URL]. English translation:
[URL]
Dutwin, D
2003 “
The Character of Deliberation: Equality, Argument, and the Formation of Public Opinion.”
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15 (3): 239–264.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F.H., and Grootendorst, R
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F.H., and Houtlosser, P
1997 “
Rhetorical Rationales for Dialectical Moves.” In
Proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, ed. by
J.F. Klumpp, 51–56. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F.H., and Houtlosser, P
2002 “
Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” In
Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, ed. by
F.H. van Eemeren and
P. Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F.H., and Houtlosser, P
2005 “
Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.” In
The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at Mcmaster University, ed. by
D. Hitchcock and
D. Farr, 75–84. Hamilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erdem, K., and Solak, M
2012 The Grand National Assembly of Turkey. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eriksson, G
2011 “
Follow-up Questions in Political Press Conferences.”
Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3331–3344.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eshbaugh-Soha, M
2003 “
Presidential Press Conferences over Time.”
American Journal of Political Science 471: 348–353.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eshbaugh-Soha, M
2012 “
The Politics of Presidential Press Conferences.”
American Politics Research 41 (3): 471–497.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Excerpts from President’s Remarks on Investigation into Attacks
2001,
September 14.
The New York Times. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
God-given Nature
Retrieved May 27, 2015, from
[URL]
Goffman, E
1986 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press. (Original work published in 1974.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, S
1986 “
Interviewers’ Questions in Broadcast Interviews.” In
Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, ed. by
J. Wilson and
B. Crow, 50–85. Jordanstown: University of Ulster.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinck, E.A
1993 Enacting the Presidency: Political Argument, Presidential Debates, and Presidential Character. Westport, CT: Praeger.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jasinski, J.L
2001 Sourcebook on Rhetoric: Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies. California: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lanoue, D.J., and Schrott, P.R
1991 The Joint Press Conference: The History, Impact, and Prospects of American Presidential Debates. New York: Greenwood Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, E
1934 “
Symbolism.” In
Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, ed. by
E.R.A. Seligman, 492–495. New York: Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, C
1990 Presidential Press Conferences: A Critical Approach. New York: Praeger Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
TMMOB
2014 18 September.
“TMMOB Soma maden kazası raporunu açıkladı [TMMOB declared the report on the Soma mine accident]”. In
The official website of the Chamber of the Mining Engineers of Turkey. Retrieved June 26, 2015 from,
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornborrow, J
2002 Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zarefsky, D
2008 “
Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation.”
Argumentation 221: 317–330.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Hansson, Sten
2018.
Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering.
Critical Discourse Studies 15:3
► pp. 228 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.