What the legislature did not say
Legislative intentions and counterfactuals in legal argumentation
Damiano Canale | Bocconi University, Milan
The paper is about the uses of the argument from legislative counterfactual intention, in the field of legal interpretation and argumentation. After presenting the argument from intention in general, it distinguishes the varities of the argument from counterfactual legislative intention and discusses their justification conditions.
Keywords: legal argumentation, counterfactuals, silent legislature, legal interpretation, possible worlds, legislative intention
Published online: 27 January 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.3.02can
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.3.02can
References
References
Allan, J.
Austin, J.L.
Bernatchez, S.
Boella, G.. et al.
Boudreau, C.. et al.
Bratman, M.E.
Campbell, T.
Canale, D. and Tuzet
Canale, D. and G. Tuzet
Ekelöf, P.O.
Feteris, E.T.
Greenawalt, K.
Honoré, T.
Levi, E.H.
McCormick, D.N. and R.S. Summers
Naffine, N.. et al.
Pettit, P.
Raz, J.
Stalnaker, R.
Stoljar, N.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Esposito, Fabrizio & Giovanni Tuzet
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.