Article published in:
Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1] 2017
► pp. 7696
References

References

Beck, G.
(2012) The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Börzel, T.
(2001) ‘Non-compliance in the European Union: pathology or statistical artefact?’, Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 803–824. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Pace-setting, foot-dragging, and fence-sitting: Member State responses to Europeanization’, JMCS 40(2): 193–214.Google Scholar
Craig, P., and de Búrca, G.
(2015) EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (6th edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrakopoulos, D. G.
(2001) ‘The Transposition of EU law: ‘post-decisional politics’ and institutional autonomy’, European Law Journal 7(4): 442–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, A. and Rhinard, M.
(2005) ‘The power of norms in the transposition of EU directives’, European Integration Online Papers 9(16): 1–22.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) ‘Identifying argumentative patterns: a vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics’. Argumentation 30(1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, and Grootendorst, R.
(1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Falkner, G., Hartlapp, M., Leiber, S., and Treib, O.
(2004) ‘Non-compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: opposition through the backdoor’, West European Politics 27(3): 452–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 95 ]
Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S.
(2005) Complying with Europe. EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis
(2012) ‘Introduction. The Argumentative Turn Revisited’, in Fischer, F., and Gottweis, H. (eds), The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice, Durham: Duke University Press, pp.1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H.
eds (2012) The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice, Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., and Forester, J.
eds (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., and Lehmkuhl, D.
(2002) ‘The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: three Europeanization mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research 41: 255–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komárek, J.
(2015) ‘Legal Reasoning in EU Law’, in Arnull, A., and Chalmers, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 28–51.Google Scholar
Majone, G.
(1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mastenbroek, E.
(2005) ‘EU compliance: still a ‘black hole’?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 1103–1120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The Politics of Compliance. Explaining the Transposition of EC Directives in the Netherlands, Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen BV.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, Ph., and Oberg, H.
(2006) ‘The compliance problem in the European Union’, EIPASCOPE 1: 1–7.Google Scholar
Prechal, A.
(2005) Directives in EC Law. (Second, completely revised edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauter, W.
(2013) ‘Proportionality in EU Law: A balancing act?’, Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit: 1–31.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W.
(1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M.
(1992) The Giving Reasons Requirement, U Chicago Legal Forum 179, 179–220.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R., and Vanderveken, D.
(1985/2009) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steunenberg, B. and Rhinard, M.
(2010) ‘The transposition of European Law in EU Member States: between process and politics’, European Political Science Review 2(3), 495–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomann, E.
(2015) ‘Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(10): 1368–1387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treaty on European Union (TEU)
available at Eur-lex.europa.eu (accessed 29 February 2016).
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)
available at Eur-lex.europa.eu. (accessed 29 February 2016).
Versluis, E.
(2004) ‘Explaining variations in implementation of EU directives’, European Integration Online Papers 8(19): 1–21.Google Scholar
Zhelyazkova, A.
(2012) Compliance under Controversy. Analysis of the Transposition of European Directives and their Provisions, Zutphen: CPI Wöhrmann Print Service.[ p. 96 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Andone, Corina & Sara Greco
2018. Evading the Burden of Proof in European Union Soft Law Instruments: The Case of Commission Recommendations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 31:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.