Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.137166
Brennan, Niamh M., Doris M. Merkl-Davies, & Annika Beelitz
(2001) Green Paper. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Presented by the Commission of the European Communities, July 18th, 2001. Brussels. [PEFCSR]
(2013) “Dialogism in Corporate Social Responsibility Communications: Conceptualising Verbal Interaction between Organisations and their Audiences.” Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4), 665–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Niamh M., & Doris M. Merkl-Davies
(2014) “Rhetoric and Argument in Social and Environmental Reporting: the Dirty Laundry Case”. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 27 (4), 602–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahlsrud, Alexander
(2008) (first version online 2006) “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 151, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Eric M.
(2006) Strategic Ambiguities: Essays on Communication, Organization, and Identity. Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Elsbach, Kimberly D.
(1994) “Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39 (1) (Mar.), 57–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garssen, Bart
(2001) “Argument schemes.” In Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 81–99. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Gâţă, Anca
(2015) “The strategic function of argumentative moves in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports.” In Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice [Argumentation in Context 9], ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, & Bart Garssen, 297–312. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itänen, Miia-Emilia
(2011) CSR Discourse in Corporate Reports – Exploring the Socially Constructed Nature of Corporate Social Responsibility. Master‘s Thesis, International Business, School of Economics, Aalto University.Google Scholar
Michelon, Giovanna, Silvia Pilonato, & Federica Ricceri
(2015) “CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 331 (December), 59–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, Rudi
(2014) Corporate argumentation in takeover bids. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1958 (1969)The New Rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation, translation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Tench, Ralph, William Sun, & Brian Jones
(eds) (2014) Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives and Practice, “Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability” Series, Vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H.
(2013a) “Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understanding and critical assessment.” Journal of Pragmatics 591, 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) “In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.” Argumentation 271, 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., & Rob Grootendorst
(1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson & Scott Jacobs
(1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa/London: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
(2007) Dialectical profiles and indicators of argument moves. In H. V. Hansen et al. (Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, CD-ROM (pp. 1–17). Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., & Peter Houtlosser
(2002) “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, & Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) “Strategic Maneuvering. Examining Argumentation in Context.” In Examining Argumentation in Context, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rees, M. Agnes, & Eddo Rigotti
(2011) “The analysis of the strategic function of presentational techniques.” In Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 207–220. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar