Corporate strategic communication has to be designed by considering multiple audiences of stakeholders. In this paper, we study the connection between the audience structure of corporate messages and the structure of the practical argumentation advanced to persuasively justify a business proposal. To this purpose, we combine a conceptual and analytical framework for the reconstruction of multiple audiences – the Text Stakeholders model (Palmieri & Mazzali 2016), with a conceptual and analytical framework for the reconstruction of argument schemes – the Argumentum Model of Topics (Rigotti & Greco Morasso 2010). A takeover proposal made by Ryanair for Aer Lingus is examined as an illustrative case in which this integrated framework is applied. We focus our analysis on Ryanair’s offer document to show how the particular structure of the audience is reflected in the selection of specific value and goal premises (endoxa) and in the activation of specific inferential relations (maxims) of practical reasoning.
(2006) The act and activity of proposing in deliberation. In P. Riley (Ed.), Engaging argument. Selected papers from the 2005 National Communication Association/American Forensic Association Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 402–408). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Aakhus, M., & Lewinski, M.
(2011) Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Benoit, W. L., & D’Agostine, J. M.
(1994) The Case of the Midnight Judges and Multiple Audience Discourse: Chief Justice Marshall and Marbury V. Madison. The Southern Communication Journal 59(2), 89–96.
(1968) The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11, 1–14.
(1980) Functional communication: A situational perspective. In E. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition: Studies in the nature and uses of rhetoric (pp. 21–38). University Park & London: Pennsylvanian State University Press.
(1999) Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Brennan, N. M., C. Daly, & C. Harrington
(2010) Rhetoric, Argument and Impression Management in Hostile Takeover Defence Documents. British Accounting Review, 42 (4), 253–268.
(2002) Practical reasoning. In J. L. Bermùdez, & A. Millar (Eds), Reason and nature: essays in the theory of rationality (pp. 85–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press.
(2004): A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. – Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R.
(1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2002) Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P.
(2002) Strategic Maneuvering. Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds), Dialectic and rhetoric: the warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluver.
(2002) A pragma-dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation, 16(3), 349–367.
Freeman, R. E.
(1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, J. B.
(1991) Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure. Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter.
(2001) Argument schemes. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 81–99). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gobber, G., & Palmieri, R.
(2014) Argumentation in institutional founding documents. The case of Switzerland’s Foedus Pactum. In G. Gobber, & A. Rocci (Eds), Language, reason and education. Studies in honor of Eddo Rigotti by his students and colleagues (pp. 171–191). Bern: Peter Lang.
(2002) Designing issues. In F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: the warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 81–96). Springer Science and Business Media.
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
(1964) The neglected situation. American anthropologist, 66(6_PART2), 133–136.
(2004) A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.
(2006): Supervision on Takeover Bids: A Comparison of Regulatory Arrangements. – Deventer: Kluwer.
Hartelius, E. J., & Browning, L. D.
(2009) The application of rhetorical theory in managerial research: a literature review. In S. R. Clegg (ed.), SAGE Directions in Organization Studies (pp. 379–404). SAGE.
(2001) Pollock on practical reasoning. Informal Logic, 22(3), 247–256.
(2010) The analysis of pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates: Second reading of the terrorism bill in the British House of Commons. Controversia, 7(1).
(2000) Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation, 14(3), 261–286.
(2014) Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 81, 1–20.
Lewinksi, M., & Aakhus, M.
(2014) Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 281, 161–185.
(2011) Generi e portatori di interesse: due nozioni-chiave per la scrittura nelle organizzazioni. Cultura e comunicazione, 041, 12–18.
Mazzali-Lurati, S., & Pollaroli, C.
(2013) Stakeholders in promotional genres. A rhetorical perspective on marketing communication. In G. Kišiček & I.Ž. Žagar. (Eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives (pp. 365–389). Ljubljana: Digital Library of Slovenia & Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
(1999) Participant roles, frames, and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 221, 595–619.
Mohammed, D., & Lewinski, M.
(2016) Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 9–12 June 2015 (Volume I1). College: London.
(1999) Political Argumentation and the Composite Audience: A Case Study. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 851, 55–71.
(2008) Reconstructing argumentative interactions in M&A offers. Studies in Communication Sciences, 8(2), 279–302.
(2002) Redefining the corporation: Stakeholders management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(2014) The nature and functions of loci in Agricola’s De inuentione Dialectica. Argumentation 28(1), 19–37.
(2009) Whether and how classical topics can be revived in the contemporary theory of argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. J. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 157–178). New York: Springer.
(2008) Locus a causa finali. In G. Gobber, S. Cantarini, S. Cigada, M. C. Gatti, & S. Gilardoni (Eds), Word meaning in argumentative dialogue. Special issue of L’analisi linguistica e letteraria XVI(2): 559–576.
(2006) Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage. Argumentation 20(4), 519–540.
(2003) La linguistica tra le scienze della comunicazione. In A. Giacalone-Ramat, E. Rigotti, & A. Rocci (Eds), Linguistica e nuove professioni (pp. 21–35). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S.
(2010) Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512.
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
(2006) Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6/21, 155–180.
(2009) Manoeuvring with voices. In: F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Examining Argumentation in Context (pp.257–283). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2008) Modality and its conversational backgrounds in the reconstruction of argumentation. Argumentation 221, 165–189.
(2006) Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(4), 409–422.
Ross, W. D.
(ed.) (1959) Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, W. D.
(ed.) (1958) Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R.
(2001) Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vega, L., & Olmos, P.
(2007) Deliberation: A paradigm in the arena of public argument. In H. V. Hansenet al. (Eds), Dissensus and the search for common ground (pp. 1–11), CD-ROM. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Von Wright, G. H.
(1963) Practical inference. The Philosophical Review, 159–179.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.